Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Aug 08, 2025 12:43 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:17 pm 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 12:43 pm
Posts: 64
First name: Arnie
State: Oregon
Zip/Postal Code: 97814
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Likey?

No Likey?

Construction issues?
Structural strength issues?
Can it be done retroactively, i.e., on a used guitar?


Tell me why or why not. I picked up a guitar with a monitor hole and thought I wouldn't like it.....but it sure seemed to allow me to hear the sound much better. My ears aren't what they used to be either....... :?

I'm thinking of someday taking this on. Just for kicks and grins.

I've noticed you folks can be somewhat opinionated. laughing6-hehe You have the floor. beehive

Arnie


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:24 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 1:41 am
Posts: 1157
Location: Siloam Springs, AR
I've never played a guitar with one, but you might have better luck searching for "sound port."

_________________
______________________________
Jonathan Kendall, Siloam Springs AR


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:31 pm 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 12:43 pm
Posts: 64
First name: Arnie
State: Oregon
Zip/Postal Code: 97814
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
letseatpaste wrote:
I've never played a guitar with one, but you might have better luck searching for "sound port."


Whoops! Is that what they're called? It seems that "sound port" would be indistinguishable from "sound hole", but what do I know? idunno laughing6-hehe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:16 pm 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 12:43 pm
Posts: 64
First name: Arnie
State: Oregon
Zip/Postal Code: 97814
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Well.......it's either a boring topic or a to-hot-to-handle topic. I thought there would be a few more opinions than this. [uncle]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:19 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 3:41 pm
Posts: 708
Location: Bothell, WA USA
First name: Jim
Last Name: Hansen
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
EOArnie wrote:
Likey?

No Likey?

Construction issues?
Structural strength issues?
Can it be done retroactively, i.e., on a used guitar?


Tell me why or why not. I picked up a guitar with a monitor hole and thought I wouldn't like it.....but it sure seemed to allow me to hear the sound much better. My ears aren't what they used to be either....... :?

I'm thinking of someday taking this on. Just for kicks and grins.

I've noticed you folks can be somewhat opinionated. laughing6-hehe You have the floor. beehive

Arnie


Arnie,

Sound Port is the term I've most commonly seen used for these.

I've never retrofitted a guitar with one, but I know people have done it succussfully. Search around here and other forums and I'm sure you'll find something. Please don't take this as an endorsement to do it (i'd not recommend modifying a guitar in this way).

That said, I have them on both of the guitars I've built. It's not difficult to do. Just use your imagination.

1. Pick a spot
2. Pick a shape
3. Reinforce the inside of the spot with a laminate of some kind
4. Make a pretty hole
5. Profit! :)

Here are some pictures of the one on my concert.

This is just a simple oval hole near the peak of the upper bought, about the size of an egg. The laminate on the inside is a thin piece of maple and a cutoff from the EIR sides. Gives it a little character and will sufficiently reinforce the side to prevent cracks/splits.. I just tapered the lip a bit to accentuate the highlight a bit.
Image
Image
Image

I'm not even going to touch the question about their affect on the sound of the instrument. beehive

I will say definitively that sound definitely comes out of the sound port when I play it. 8-) I will also say that I like having it there. It looks cool, and I like how it sounds. :D

YMMV

_________________
Jim Hansen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:48 am 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 12:43 pm
Posts: 64
First name: Arnie
State: Oregon
Zip/Postal Code: 97814
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks Jim......excellent insight, and beautiful work.

However, I'm somewhat surprised that you laminated the area for strength purposes. I'm not saying you're wrong. It just seems that at that particular area of the bend, there is a fair amount of inherent strength. idunno


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:58 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5586
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
EOArnie wrote:
Thanks Jim......excellent insight, and beautiful work.

However, I'm somewhat surprised that you laminated the area for strength purposes. I'm not saying you're wrong. It just seems that at that particular area of the bend, there is a fair amount of inherent strength. idunno


Seems to me with a soundport about half the width of the side is removed, and, if there was no reinforcement, unsupported end grain is exposed and liable to crack when the sides flex, both when strung up and with humidity changes.
This might well significantly wow7-eyes weaken the side.

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:46 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3933
Location: United States
EOArnie wrote:
"However, I'm somewhat surprised that you laminated the area for strength purposes. "

You've never had to fix a side crack, have you?

I think 'monitor hole' is probably a good name for the thing, since that's what it does, but by now 'side port' is the accepted term.

I like to make the 'main' soundhole smaller when I put in a port, but that's my opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 1:08 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 552
City: winnipeg
State: manitoba
Country: canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Alan:
The backing has the grain at 90* to the grain in the side and is more to protect against splitting at the exposed end-grain rather than for strength. That is the explanation usually used on ukuleles.

Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:50 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 3:41 pm
Posts: 708
Location: Bothell, WA USA
First name: Jim
Last Name: Hansen
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
EOArnie wrote:
However, I'm somewhat surprised that you laminated the area for strength purposes. I'm not saying you're wrong. It just seems that at that particular area of the bend, there is a fair amount of inherent strength.


"Strength" isn't the word I used. I used "Reinforce"... I think cracking/splitting is the primary concern.

_________________
Jim Hansen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:49 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:51 am
Posts: 3786
Location: Canada
Another take ... port mimics the ribrest shape ...


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Tony Karol
www.karol-guitars.com
"let my passion .. fulfill yours"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:06 am 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 12:43 pm
Posts: 64
First name: Arnie
State: Oregon
Zip/Postal Code: 97814
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Jim_H wrote:
EOArnie wrote:
However, I'm somewhat surprised that you laminated the area for strength purposes. I'm not saying you're wrong. It just seems that at that particular area of the bend, there is a fair amount of inherent strength.


"Strength" isn't the word I used. I used "Reinforce"... I think cracking/splitting is the primary concern.


Gotcha. Makes sense.

I have to say though.....

I thought there would be a little more reaction from the purist camp. beehive

Maybe it is more of an accepted practice than I thought. :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com