So here is kind of what I'm thinking about for the bracing. In my original sketching for this, it looked like I would end up with an X that was rotated and offset to one side in order to support both ends of the bridge. When I started laying it out on the bridge, I did not like the way the x-brace on one side would have either replaced a long section of the lining in the upper bout, or would have had to pierce the UTB. But as I write this, I'm thinking about going back. I'm also wondering if a longer bridge would let me spread the braces and loosen things up a bit.
So now, I'm thinking about a symmetrical X that hits one end of the bridge and pick up the other end with a tone bar.
Either way, does anyone have opinion on grain orientation for the bridge plate? Any reason to not have it parallel to the bridge angle?
The body is an OLF MJ, the biggest thing I already had forms for and I put the sound hole in based on those plans. Looking at the braces and the extra frets slots I've got, I may move it down a bit.
It's been raining hard here every day, and as we usually get 15 inches of precip a year, it's way more humid than we are used to. I'll have to wait a while before I can glue on braces or I'll have a flat top with a crack in it for sure.
As I look at the preview, I notice the bridge appears to be backwards. That's because the top is flipped. Also FWIW, the bridge location is pre-compensation, and the body joins the neck at the 12 fret on the bass side. I wanted to keep it in close so it wasn't too far to reach, but looking at the bridge placement, I wonder if that was the right choice.
Mike
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
_________________ Mike Lindstrom
|