Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 2:08 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:34 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:44 pm
Posts: 706
First name: Wendy
Last Name: W
State: Arizona
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I am building a small bodied classical based on a Torres FE17 size, shape, and general bracing, but not a copy. The guitar is for a friend of mine, who lives in Arizona and, depite being well aware of the effects of low humidity on guitars, refuses to keep a guitar in a case. She does at least keep Oasis type humidifiers in the soundholes, and they are inserted through a hole in a soft neoprene soundhole cover. My question is: Do bridge pads add any structural strength? I was not planning on using one, since Torres does not, but any help I can provide to keep the guitar from cracking I would be willing to do. I have also read somewhere in the archives that a cross brace under the bridge can add some structural strength and help to maintain the arch. I am a little concerned with overbracing, since this is a very stiff bear claw Sitka top. Even at a hair over 2mm it still feels quite stiff. I have been keeping the humidity down lower than usual in my shop, and hope to assemble at somewhere between 30-40%. But humidity here can dip much lower than that. Please do not suggest trying to convince her to use a case, since that is a done deal and she is willing to take the risk. So any suggestions as to bridge pad, crossbrace, or nothing as planned?
Thanks, Wendy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 3:40 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:44 am
Posts: 2186
Location: Newark, DE
First name: Jim
Last Name: Kirby
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Even some modern flamenco guitars (such as Reyes - see GAL plan) have quite long bridge patches spanning quite a wide portion of the soundboard (from side to side), and this does not appear to be detrimental. The Reyes has a relatively large soundboard, though, and might be quite floppy when thinned to flamenco thicknesses without the bridge patch. I'm not sure of the pros and cons on the Torres design, but I guess I'd be inclined to add the patch given what you know about the guitar's living conditions.

_________________
Jim Kirby
kirby@udel.edu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:01 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:05 am
Posts: 9191
Location: United States
First name: Waddy
Last Name: Thomson
City: Charlotte
State: NC
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I'm just going to mention this. I have read that a bridge patch could actually work against you as an insurance against cracking. When you glue a Spruce patch cross grain to a Spruce top, you are gluing a patch that does not expand and contract much longitudinally with a top that expands and contracts a great deal across the grain. The patch could actually introduce a cracking hazard, when the patch and the top are working against each other.

_________________
Waddy

Photobucket Build Album Library

Sound Clips of most of my guitars


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:35 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:57 pm
Posts: 133
First name: Tom
Last Name: Dl
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
It is certainly true that crossgrain is a problem, but the bridge is also crossgrain, so the question is whether the patch will help sort out a problem that is already there. Like 3 layer plywood rather than just the first two layers. I'm no help, it isn't all that tough on wood around here. I would start with a domed soundboard in the area of the bridge.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 9:50 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:31 am
Posts: 936
Location: Ottawa, Canada
The thing I don't understand about the bridge patches I see used on classical guitars is that they don't seem to be any wider (from front to back) than bridges. In that regard I don't see how they help at all in preventing the bridge from pushing the sound board down in front and up below. I will say that if the patch is made a little wider than the bridge and is nicely rounded on the ends, it could assist in preventing cracks coming off the sharp corners of the bridge which are local stress points.

Pat

_________________
There are three kinds of people:

Those that make things happen,
those that watch things happen,
and those that wondered what happened.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:19 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:44 pm
Posts: 706
First name: Wendy
Last Name: W
State: Arizona
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I had decided to not use the bridge patch, and this morning I am getting ready to start bracing and am having 2nd thoughts again. I'm confused after reading Tom's reply to what Waddy said, since it's true that the bridge is also crossgrain. Any more thoughts on this? The only thing I have to go on is 2 guitars that have hung exposed on the wall at a friends house, both classicals about 35 years old. 1 is a Hirade, and the other is a Yairi. The one with the soundboard cracks is the Yairi, built without a bridge patch. It's not really a good example, I know, since the Yairi has been treated poorly, and neither is a high end guitar. Not to mention all the other variables like soundboard thickness and bracing. It just got me wondering. Wendy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:29 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:29 am
Posts: 3840
Location: England
You're going to build a guitar based on one from the greatest guitar maker of all time, many have tried to improve on them, none have convincingly succeeded. Many of his guitars still survive and not one ever had a bridge patch. I build pure Torres, and have never felt the need for one either. Don't overthink this, or try and second guess the master. You don't need a patch.

Colin

_________________
I don't believe in anything, I simply make use of a set of reasonable working hypotheses.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:55 am 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:46 am
Posts: 33
First name: Bart
Last Name: Hovis
City: St. Louis
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Colin S wrote:
You're going to build a guitar based on one from the greatest guitar maker of all time, many have tried to improve on them, none have convincingly succeeded. Many of his guitars still survive and not one ever had a bridge patch. I build pure Torres, and have never felt the need for one either. Don't overthink this, or try and second guess the master. You don't need a patch.

Colin


Thanks for that post, Colin! It should be in the post hall of fame (if there is one).

I thrashed around on the bridge patch concept for years, and ultimately dropped it for numerous reasons. Hauser haunts us with it. As far as I'm aware, Hauser was the first to use it on a classical guitar - my guess is that it was a vestige from his northern European style guitars, but that's just a guess as I'm not aware of any Spanish luthier having used it before Hauser. 1937 was the period when he was still trying to please Segovia and did a lot of experimenting. It's important to note that later Hauser guitars (at least some) did not use the bridge patch.

Happy Holidays, all!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 10:20 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 426
First name: jim
Last Name: mccarthy
City: ojai
State: ca
Zip/Postal Code: 93023
Country: usa
Focus: Build
In my opinion, the important point here is that you keep the humidity way down when building this instrument.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:55 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:44 pm
Posts: 706
First name: Wendy
Last Name: W
State: Arizona
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thankyou Colin and Bart, exactly the reason I had decided not to include it, and then you are right, I started overthinking it when I got worried about the conditions it would be kept in. And keeping the humidity way down is the plan, wouldn't you know that the weather has changed and I may have to put it on hold for a while. My dehumidifier is running full blast and the shop doesn't want to drop below 48%. I'm thinking of heating it very high and then kicking on the a/c to dry it out. Last time I did that I froze up the a/c, but it's not that cold out this time. I usually don't assemble in the winter here because this is when we get our rain. Thanks for the advice and I'll let this discussion rest now.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com