Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Wed Aug 13, 2025 2:27 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:58 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:50 am
Posts: 942
Location: Ellicott City, Md - USA
First name: John
Last Name: A
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Hi everyone -

Today I was laying out my 4 braces for my back on my first classical - I am following the Cumpiano/Natelson book -
for their guitar they have 4 back braces -
While laying it out I noticed that the 2nd brace is pretty close to the first brace - (closest to headblock) can I just omit the 2nd brace and make 3 brace back ?

The 3rd brace is in the lower waist - and the 4th is in the midle of the lower bout.

Thanks !!

_________________
It's this new idea from recent decades that everyone gets a participation award. - MUX


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:04 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 1505
Location: Lorette, Manitoba, Canada
First name: Douglas
Last Name: Ingram
City: Lorette
State: Manitoba
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
I thought that 3 was pretty much standard!

On smaller bodies, such as the FE17, I've gone down to 2, leaving out the one just before the heel.

_________________
Expectation is the source of all misery; comparison the thief of joy.
http://redrivercanoe.ca/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:05 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:59 pm
Posts: 2103
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Country: Romania
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Sounds odd to me. Look at the GAL plan thumbnails to get an idea for where they normally are. A 4 brace back works better for a large shape with a thin back, with the lower two packed relatively close across the lower bout. Or, a few people reach for 4 braces instead of 3 when using a low density back.

_________________
Build log


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:35 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:16 am
Posts: 2692
4

_________________
Howard Klepper
http://www.klepperguitars.com

When all else fails, clean the shop.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:06 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:50 am
Posts: 942
Location: Ellicott City, Md - USA
First name: John
Last Name: A
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Two guitars I have on my wall have 3 braces - 4 braces seem like too much - I am using maple and it is pretty stiff as it is. I will just omit the 2nd brace - It seems like it is a judgement call - if my back is loose and soft - then go with 4 - or stiff and thick - go with 3 - right ?

In the Cumpiano/Natelson plan it shows a brace by the heel, then another just a couple inches below that - that looks like it would be at the middle of the soundhole. Then another below the sound hole and a lower bout brace.


Howard - you simply writing of the number 4 - leads me to believe that you feel strongly about 4 back braces - why ?

_________________
It's this new idea from recent decades that everyone gets a participation award. - MUX


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:00 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:59 pm
Posts: 2103
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Country: Romania
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
If you do omit the "soundhole brace" you should move up the lower two a bit. The last should cross the whole width of the lower bout and the middle should be a inch or two below the waist.

_________________
Build log


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 2:40 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6262
Location: Virginia
For me it depends on the stiffness of the back. One of my personal older guitars with three braces showed some deformation in the dry months that could have been controlled better with four braces. Well it could have been controlled better with a humidifier too :mrgreen:

I like to build very light classical guitars so I try to omit that brace but on the larger ones it's tempting to put one in, then you can lose a bit more weight on a thinner back and perhaps gain some volume IDK?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 5:03 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:10 pm
Posts: 2485
Location: Argyle New York
First name: Mike/Mikey/Michael/hey you!
Last Name: Collins
City: Argyle
State: New York
Zip/Postal Code: 12809
Country: U.S.A. /America-yea!!
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Leave the back as thick as you can .
I use a X brace.
with one transverse brace just a few mm from the neck block!
Stiff box & sides with flexible top !
KILLER Guitars !
Mike ;)

_________________
Mike Collins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:13 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 4:15 pm
Posts: 183
First name: Joe
Last Name: Ulman
City: Bellevue
State: Washington
Country: US
Focus: Build
Quote:
While laying it out I noticed that the 2nd brace is pretty close to the first brace - (closest to headblock) can I just omit the 2nd brace and make 3 brace back ?


Hi John – Not sure if you are leaning toward a traditional design but FWIW – Courtnall’s book shows representations of several traditional makers: Torres, Santos Hernandez, Hermann Hauser, Hernandez Aguado, Fleta, Bouchet, Friederich, and Romanillos; 650mm scale, all have 3 back braces. The 604mm Torres has 2. I’m just working on my first and followed Brune’s 650mm Hauser plans which show 3 back braces.

When creating the arch in the back per Cumpiano it seems to me that it would be somewhat trickier to get the arching even, both across and longitudinal, and also profile the sides to perfectly match when using 4 braces; but maybe it’s not difficult, or maybe flexing the back/braces into position a millimeter here and there isn’t a big deal.

Joe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:25 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 1505
Location: Lorette, Manitoba, Canada
First name: Douglas
Last Name: Ingram
City: Lorette
State: Manitoba
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
JoeUlman wrote:


When creating the arch in the back per Cumpiano it seems to me that it would be somewhat trickier to get the arching even, both across and longitudinal, and also profile the sides to perfectly match when using 4 braces; but maybe it’s not difficult, or maybe flexing the back/braces into position a millimeter here and there isn’t a big deal.

Joe


I found the arching of the back far easier to achieve once I started fitting the braces to the body first. Then I can use a template to set the basic shape, and then a large sanding board set to the correct arc for the back radius to refine the shaping.

_________________
Expectation is the source of all misery; comparison the thief of joy.
http://redrivercanoe.ca/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:05 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:50 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Victoria, BC
First name: John
Last Name: Abercrombie
Status: Amateur
douglas ingram wrote:
I found the arching of the back far easier to achieve once I started fitting the braces to the body first.


Doug-
How do you glue on the back? Do you glue the braces into the rims then glue on the back, or you you have a trick for getting the braces correctly positioned on the back before closing the box??
Brian Burns described to me how he 'picks up' the (fitted but unglued) braces from the body with a small amount of hide glue on each brace center...

Cheers
John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 1:28 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:59 pm
Posts: 2103
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Country: Romania
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Yes the braces are fitted on the rims (I use a 1/4 chisel, and it is one the parts I love the most, along carving the top bracing), then glued in their pockets, then more trimming and tuning can be performed. In my case it means checking there are no low spots - there should always be some rocking when I touch a brace with a straight edge. If anything, getting a nice fit between brace and lining is probably much easier than having to fiddle with the entire plate (just guessing, i never did it the normal way). The fit really can go beyond nice or acceptable. I have often seen only approximate fittings through the soundhole, and together with shredded spruce around the rosette it makes for serious frowning on my part.

I did not do one with 4 yet but apart from more work, i do not see why there should be problems with getting the doming right.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Build log


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:52 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:50 am
Posts: 942
Location: Ellicott City, Md - USA
First name: John
Last Name: A
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
How do you then accurately cut the space for the brace on the center strip ?
How do you clean any glue squeeze out ?

_________________
It's this new idea from recent decades that everyone gets a participation award. - MUX


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:18 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:59 pm
Posts: 2103
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Country: Romania
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I carefully measure the distances and it works fine. I actually glue separate strip pieces instead of a long one.
For squeeze out you just need to learn the right amount of glue. If I still get a few beads here and there (in the photo too by the upper brace) I do not mind it. I don't try to please all squeezeoutfreaks :)


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Build log


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:33 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:05 am
Posts: 9191
Location: United States
First name: Waddy
Last Name: Thomson
City: Charlotte
State: NC
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I use a bit of a different procedure. My braces are full height at the wings of the brace, rather than scooped at the ends, so i use brace supports on the sides which are glued in first. Then I set the braces in place un-glued, and install the linings around them. Then I use double stick tape on the ends of the braces after sanding the dome in them, and position the top, and press down the edges to catch the tape I then work the top off with the braces attached, and carefully clamp the ends down, and position tape dams at the ends and edges to lock the position, take off the d/s tape, and glue them in place with HHG or Fish Glue or LMI White, depending on how long I want to wait. When dry, I make sure it fits back into position on the box. If it's right, I glue in the back strip in sections between the braces, then glue it on the box. I do it this way, because I have twice had a brace hang on the back strip when gluing it to the already braced body. So far this way has worked really well. There is a good series of pictures in Waddys #5 build album, page 7. Link below to Photobucket albums.

_________________
Waddy

Photobucket Build Album Library

Sound Clips of most of my guitars


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:45 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 1505
Location: Lorette, Manitoba, Canada
First name: Douglas
Last Name: Ingram
City: Lorette
State: Manitoba
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
I lay out the back brace positions, then glue in the kerfed lining to the layout position, fit the brace, then continue fitting the lining. I find this easier that gluing in full length lining and then cutting notches for the brace.

I first use my arced sanding board to establish the final heights of the ribs.

My back braces are full height to the end and are supported by small blocks. I set a template from heel to butt and fit the back brace to this height, thus establishing the curve of the back along the length. Once all the braces are set in, I take the template and establish the curve from side to side by tracing a line off of the template onto the brace. Then the brace is rough cut to the line, replaced into the brace pockets along the lining, and then using the arced sanding long board, the final shaping is established.

To fit the back is easy. The back is laid over the guitar body and the brace end locations are marked. Lines are drawn on the back to identify the brace location on the center strip, which is then fitted to the braces. Having the braces keep the back properly located, I can then fit the center strip to the slipper foot and the butt block.

Once satisfied that all lines up just right during the dry fit, glue it in place. Arcing the back over the braces ensures that pressure is applied for a good fit.

I used to do it the other way around, glue all the back braces to the back first and then try and fit it to the rims with the linings all glued in, but I find this way much easier.

And, of course, the photos show up in reverse order...


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Expectation is the source of all misery; comparison the thief of joy.
http://redrivercanoe.ca/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:32 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:50 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Victoria, BC
First name: John
Last Name: Abercrombie
Status: Amateur
Alexandru, Waddy, Doug-
Thanks!

A couple of 'wrinkles' I learned from Brian Burns:
If you use kerfed linings and aren't overly concerned if a brace is a few mm 'out of place', you can glue in a section of lining, space for the brace, glue another lining section, etc. . (Avoids part-blocks of lining...)
You can make a jig to check the action at the 12th fret and do a final 'neck angle adjustment' before gluing on the back (with the body and neck held in the jig).

Cheers
John


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bobgramann, johnparchem, stumblin and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com