Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Wed Aug 13, 2025 4:38 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Cutting binding channels
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 6:29 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 4:15 pm
Posts: 183
First name: Joe
Last Name: Ulman
City: Bellevue
State: Washington
Country: US
Focus: Build
If the binding is a bit taller than the purflings, (0.27” vs. 0.25”) can I cut the binding channel to match the purfling and plane the excess .02” off the binding after glue-up?

Attachment:
binding detail.jpg


Also, do I make any thickness allowance for the glue layers, e.g., between the sandwiched binding and purflings, when calculating the rabbet thickness? Thanks.

Joe


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 6:37 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 4:53 am
Posts: 1584
Location: PA, United States
#1 yes you can, it's easier.

#2 You need to be aware and accommodate for swelling with wood glues. Test fit on scrap, make notes. Modify your depth if necessary. It's a good idea to leave the bindings slightly proud, they're easier to scrape flush than to scrape the top, back, or sides down to the binding. Test on scrap first (make a nicely bound wooden jewelry box) :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 6:43 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 4:15 pm
Posts: 183
First name: Joe
Last Name: Ulman
City: Bellevue
State: Washington
Country: US
Focus: Build
Thanks Terry.

Joe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 7:22 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:50 am
Posts: 942
Location: Ellicott City, Md - USA
First name: John
Last Name: A
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I am looking at the picture above - doesn't the binding channel need to be stepped ? or can it also be cut like this ? It looks easier to cut this way.

_________________
It's this new idea from recent decades that everyone gets a participation award. - MUX


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:32 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:27 am
Posts: 161
Location: Portugal
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
@John. On my first and now on #2 I have done with the step for the purfling. I am considering doing like this on the next.
For the binding I have chosen 2 mm padouk but I think next time I will chose 1mm; much easier to bend and if needed one can always add another thin veneer on the inside .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 7:09 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:59 am
Posts: 1964
Location: Rochester Michigan
Terry Stowell wrote:
It's a good idea to leave the bindings slightly proud, they're easier to scrape flush than to scrape the top, back, or sides down to the binding. Test on scrap first (make a nicely bound wooden jewelry box) :)


While I agree its a good idea to leave them pround on top, there's a lot of guys who scrape the sides down to the bindings - only a few thou though.

The issue is that if you scraspe the bindings, it's really easy to get bindings that are not even in thickness and it's pretty obvious.


To the op, typically the purflings aren't the full depth like the binding. The binding and purfling channel is usually L shaped.

_________________
http://www.birkonium.com CNC Products for Luthiers
http://banduramaker.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:46 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Posts: 23
Location: Atlanta, GA
First name: Kevin
Last Name: Smith
City: Decatur
State: GA
Zip/Postal Code: 30030
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
If you are using full-height purfling lines, you should be okay. If using the shallow purfling lines you'd have to make sure that the tape or whatever pushed down on the purfling. The taller binding may in some instances create an angle that would cause the clamping force to miss hitting the purfling. One way around this is to do purfling first and then glue the binding. But that's a lot of tape.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:56 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:47 am
Posts: 1244
Location: Montreal, Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
John A wrote:
I am looking at the picture above - doesn't the binding channel need to be stepped ? or can it also be cut like this ? It looks easier to cut this way.


I've been doing it like in the picture for over 40 guitars now with no issues yet.

_________________
Alain Moisan
Former full time builder of Acoustics, Classicals and Flamencos.
(Now building just for fun!)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 8:54 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:50 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Victoria, BC
First name: John
Last Name: Abercrombie
Status: Amateur
Andy Birko wrote:

While I agree its a good idea to leave them proud on top, there's a lot of guys who scrape the sides down to the bindings - only a few thou though.

The issue is that if you scrape the bindings, it's really easy to get bindings that are not even in thickness and it's pretty obvious.


[:Y:] [:Y:] [:Y:]
Been there, done that- now I bring the sides down to the bindings if necessary.

Cheers
John


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com