Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Mon Aug 11, 2025 9:05 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 35' radius on top
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 8:40 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:58 pm
Posts: 316
So, I'm trying my new(ish) 35' radius set-up for bracing the top of a SS guitar.

Can someone who's using this radius on their tops tell me how close this will put you toward getting an optimum neck angle?

TIA,

_________________
Ken Mitchell
Durham, NC


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 35' radius on top
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:00 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:12 pm
Posts: 6994
First name: Mike
Last Name: O'Melia
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
That is a huge radius!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 35' radius on top
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:24 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:58 pm
Posts: 316
Todd,

That's what I remember reading/hearing. I'm thinking that I'll need to add just a little more angle into the upper bout to be where I want. This is a 00-size guitar (if that makes any difference).

Thanks for the input.

_________________
Ken Mitchell
Durham, NC


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 35' radius on top
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:47 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:50 am
Posts: 3152
Location: Canada
Hey Ken,

Unless I am missing something, the "ideal" neck angle is a product of the top radius and desired bridge height. Although 1.5 degrees appears as an "industry standard" one must remember that there are a bunch of different top radii (from 15' or tighter, to the 60' that is used on R-Taylor's and others to the flat tops used by Olsen, Ryan and others). So the neck angle is just part of the geometry required to establish clean string movement, torque to the bridge and playing action you desire. There are many guitars that are using a reverse neck set, the neck is set forward (Fox, Greenfield and others). I am highly inexperienced at making guitars but have researched a lot so I can stand corrected on any of this but I have made hundreds of radius dishes of every radius for many different builders.

Anyway, I post this as food for thought (and discussion!)

Shane

_________________
Canada


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 35' radius on top
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:04 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:50 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Victoria, BC
First name: John
Last Name: Abercrombie
Status: Amateur
What Shane said..... [:Y:]

and-
the difference in 'dome height' between a 28' radius top and a 35' radius top is not a heck of a lot....on the order of .040"...so can probably be dealt with at the 'fine tuning' stage of setting neck angle/bridge height/saddle height

Bookmark this link; very useful calculator for sagitta of an arc !
http://liutaiomottola.com/formulae/sag.htm

Cheers
John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 35' radius on top
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:57 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:58 pm
Posts: 316
Thanks for all of the thoughts and information, guys. I guess what I'm really concerned about is the fretboard extension area, and how much extra angle to work into that area when using a 35' dome, in order to match the neck angle as best as I can. I like to flatten this part of the guitar (and have a nice jig designed for that purpose - thanks to my builder friend Paul H!). Then I make the transverse brace flat instead of domed (radiused), so as to allow the fretboard extension to lay flat on the guitar top. I like to see a pretty much straight extension area, when looking down the fretboard (with just a 'slight' amount of 'drop off') and am trying to avoid an 'excessive' amount of drop there.

I know that there are multiple ways of going about this, and I'm just trying to come up with a system that works for me. I appreciate everyone's input. And I like your motto/tag/quote (or whatever those are called), Shane, about learning, teaching, etc. This forum is certainly a good place for that to happen.

_________________
Ken Mitchell
Durham, NC


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 35' radius on top
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:06 am 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:11 pm
Posts: 87
I use 32' for my tops and the height at bridge is nearly perfect. Like was said before, the difference between 28' and 35' are very minute.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: TRein and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com