Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Mon Aug 11, 2025 2:16 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:46 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:29 am
Posts: 1384
Location: United States
I hear a difference in my guitars with non adjustable rods versus adjustable and I like the sound better with a solid rod(s). I am willing to take the risk every time on guitars for myself but it would have to be a very educated customer where I would feel comfortable building a commissioned guitar like that. I could see it happening though. I supply saddle shims with all my guitars, even ones with adjustable rods. It is a quick and simple thing that anyone can do easily between seasons if they are not careful with the guitar's immediate environment.

To David though I would probably say that for your first guitars it would be a good idea to put an adjustable rod in. I did on my early ones and I am glad that I did.

_________________
Burton
http://www.legeytinstruments.com
Brookline, MA.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:13 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:22 pm
Posts: 123
First name: Jonas
Last Name: Baker
City: North Haven
State: CT
Zip/Postal Code: 06473
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I've heard a lot of builders and repairmen speak highly of the steel T bar truss rods (unadjustable) that Martin used from the mid 30's to the 60's, as they did an excellent job of keeping the necks from warping, and they also keep the neck very very stiff. The T bars were different than the square tube unadjustable truss rod that martin switched to in the 60's, which apparently didn't work very well.

Has anyone here used the the steel T bars? I'd love to hear how they worked for anyone who has used them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:43 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:44 pm
Posts: 217
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I understand the objection to the lack of adjustability and if I sold anything (I give everything away at this point) I would go with the adjustable truss rod. But think of the forces and response of the wood when tightening the rod, then imagine a couple of CF rods close by fighting this. Seems weird to me. Fwiw I play with a low action and like a straight neck. My next project is a traditional acoustic (except for fanned frets) and will use the normal adjustable rod.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 4:51 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:07 pm
Posts: 267
jeb98 wrote:

Has anyone here used the the steel T bars? I'd love to hear how they worked for anyone who has used them.


I gave it a go a few years ago. I guess it's too early to tell how it will turn out- so far it's fine. I used the runner from a flexible flyer sled, which is a bit (not much) smaller T than old Martin's had. It seemed plenty stiff and I was glad to save a bit of weight. I also used a chunky V neck.

If the goal is to build something old school, which is very educational, then a T bar is a fine choice.

John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:20 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:44 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Crownsville, MD
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Lewis
City: Crownsville
State: MD
Zip/Postal Code: 21032
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
What's weird about it? You're just making the neck stiffer. You still have adjustability via the truss rod...you'll just have a smaller window of adjustability. For what it's worth, I believe Collings adds 2 stainless steel reinforcing bars into their necks (1 on either side of the truss rod). The only real reason to use CF instead of metal is if you have a weight critical application. Otherwise, metals work really well...!

Trev

lactose wrote:
I understand the objection to the lack of adjustability and if I sold anything (I give everything away at this point) I would go with the adjustable truss rod. But think of the forces and response of the wood when tightening the rod, then imagine a couple of CF rods close by fighting this. Seems weird to me. Fwiw I play with a low action and like a straight neck. My next project is a traditional acoustic (except for fanned frets) and will use the normal adjustable rod.

_________________
http://www.PeakeGuitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:16 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:07 pm
Posts: 267
I was browsing through an old issue of guitarmaker and found some interesting measurements that Jim Rickard made of a 1939 D-45 (a T-bar guitar). The article is from 1992.

Among other things, Jim measured the state of the fingerboard without string tension and with string tension. I'll give some of the numbers here.

(inches)
Fret, Bottom of fingerboard with no string tension, Change at top surface of frets with medium strings

1 -0.1250 0.0629
2 -0.1100 0.0528
3 -0.0970 0.0449
4 -0.0850 0.0371
5 -0.0740 0.0307
6 -0.0630 0.2510
7 -0.0540 0.0207
8 -0.0440 0.0161
9 -0.0360 0.0127
10 -0.0280 0.0094
11 -0.0200 0.0066
12 -0.0130 0.0048
13 -0.0060 0.0023
14 0.0000 0.0008
15 0.0060 -0.0013
16 0.0130 -0.0019
17 0.0200 -0.0036
18 0.0260 -0.0050
19 0.0330 -0.0070
20 0.0390 -0.0082

John


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com