Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Aug 08, 2025 11:11 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 9:00 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 1505
Location: Lorette, Manitoba, Canada
First name: Douglas
Last Name: Ingram
City: Lorette
State: Manitoba
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
I've done 18 hole bridges a few times. The only extra work is the task of drilling 18 holes cleanly and evenly, but I'm sure that you are up to that task.

18 hole bridges make tying on the strings really easy, and allows the tie block decoration to be totally unobstructed-an aesthetic benefit.

I does make removing the strings more challenging as it holds the string really well. If the strings will be removed frequently this may be an issue for some peoples' fingers.

I am coming to the opinion that a 12 hole bridge offers the best combination of ease of tying and ease of string removal. You still have to live with the one loop over the tie block.

12 and 18 hole bridges to change the break angle of the string over the saddle, which can be a good thing. They also change the torque of the saddle, which may not be a good thing, tough to say.

After typing all this out, I just went back to look at the photos, and i am reading them wrong! He is using this like a 12 hole bridge, and using the extra holes just to tuck in the string ends. I don't know for how long a player will want to bother that extra bit of fastidiousness! Most of us will just get lazy after awhile... But this does give the option of using it as a regular 12 hole or an 18, or a 12 with tucked in strings, and you can still use is as a 6!

The individual saddle blocks are a variation of the Gilbert pin saddle. Each string is focused on its own saddle, theoretically focusing all of its energy into the soundboard rather than spreading it along the saddle,and allowing precise intonation for each string. Does this bear out in practice? Hard to say-builder's prerogative.

_________________
Expectation is the source of all misery; comparison the thief of joy.
http://redrivercanoe.ca/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 10:04 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:05 am
Posts: 9191
Location: United States
First name: Waddy
Last Name: Thomson
City: Charlotte
State: NC
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
All of my bridges have had 18 hole bridges, and I love them. However, I've never seen that tie. Usually, on an 18 hole bridge, the strings don't cross the tie block. To me, that's the appeal. That, and the break angle improvement.

That bridge looks like an adaptation of Gilbert's pin bridge, but he used metal pins for the saddle.

_________________
Waddy

Photobucket Build Album Library

Sound Clips of most of my guitars


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 12:43 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:10 pm
Posts: 2485
Location: Argyle New York
First name: Mike/Mikey/Michael/hey you!
Last Name: Collins
City: Argyle
State: New York
Zip/Postal Code: 12809
Country: U.S.A. /America-yea!!
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I use 12 on flamencos(less tie block wood) & 18 on classicals.
I have used the Gilbert pin style saddles -BUT much more time consuming to set up!
As a difference in sound -Not even one of the great guitarists or musicians with great hearing capacity could tell the difference between a regular saddle & the pin style!
So why other?
Looks neat !
Mike

_________________
Mike Collins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 12:57 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:59 pm
Posts: 2103
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Country: Romania
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I've made a few 12 hole bridges and 1 with 18. They are cool but now I'm back to 6 unless I am asked for 12/18. 6 is nice too. I have plenty of string break because i drill the holes low, but for a flat flamenco bridge I would put 12 as Mike said.

_________________
Build log


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 2:47 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:47 am
Posts: 1244
Location: Montreal, Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I've read somewhere (don't remember where, maybe here) a luthier mentioning that drilling 12 or 18 holes weakens the tie block and thus makes the bridge more prone to cracking along the holes line.

It made sens to me at the time so I stuck with 6 holes. anybody had such problems with more than 6 holes bridges?

_________________
Alain Moisan
Former full time builder of Acoustics, Classicals and Flamencos.
(Now building just for fun!)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 2:55 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:05 am
Posts: 9191
Location: United States
First name: Waddy
Last Name: Thomson
City: Charlotte
State: NC
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I mean they don't cross the top of the tie block.

Attachment:
P1030448 (Large).JPG

Attachment:
P1020325 (Large).JPG


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Waddy

Photobucket Build Album Library

Sound Clips of most of my guitars


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 3:04 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:50 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Victoria, BC
First name: John
Last Name: Abercrombie
Status: Amateur
EDIT-Waddy was typing faster than I was!
Filippo Morelli wrote:
WaddyThomson wrote:
However, I've never seen that tie. Usually, on an 18 hole bridge, the strings don't cross the tie block. To me, that's the appeal.


Waddy, I'm a bit at a loss on the description. You say the strings don't cross the tie block ... what do you mean? Obviously the string crosses the tie block at least once regardless of the approach? Can you post a photo of yours?

Cross over the tie block ....- all the 'passes' are 'through' the block and the tie block overlay is completely visible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 3:30 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:51 pm
Posts: 1134
Location: Albany NY
First name: David
Last Name: LaPlante
Status: Professional
Indeed, being able to leave the top surface of the tie block open for a decorative touch is the best thing about the 18 hole bridge.
I haven't attempted to get a string to slip and smack the top on one of these but I don't think it would happen in the same way as on a single hole. The mechanical advantage of the three holes I think would slow the strng down too much.
Attachment:
Complete#90-004.jpg


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 4:51 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:10 pm
Posts: 2485
Location: Argyle New York
First name: Mike/Mikey/Michael/hey you!
Last Name: Collins
City: Argyle
State: New York
Zip/Postal Code: 12809
Country: U.S.A. /America-yea!!
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Nice work Dave-As usual !
I have pics of a 12 & 18 hole next to eack other on my web page.
I'll never go back to a 6 holer!
On MY guitars!
mc

_________________
Mike Collins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 5:03 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:29 am
Posts: 3840
Location: England
I use 18 hole bridges the same as David and Waddy, and for the same resons, but I like to put a bone plate on the rear of mine, which stops the tendency of the string to cut into the wood between the holes.

Colin

Image

_________________
I don't believe in anything, I simply make use of a set of reasonable working hypotheses.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 10:53 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:22 pm
Posts: 204
Location: Taiwan
I've done one 18, a couple of 6, and mostly 12. I prefer 12 ,but 6 can be perfectly fuctional and sexy, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 10:38 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6262
Location: Virginia
I'm curious to hear any comments on the individual saddle pieces. My first impression is that I don't like it. It looks cool sure but it seems to me that it isolates the individual strings and they won't resonate and drone properly against the other strings but I could be totally wrong, I've never tried it or even played one like it. I'm sure the maker has a very good reason why it's done and I am curious to know.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 11:18 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:50 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Victoria, BC
First name: John
Last Name: Abercrombie
Status: Amateur
jfmckenna wrote:
I'm curious to hear any comments on the individual saddle pieces. My first impression is that I don't like it. It looks cool sure but it seems to me that it isolates the individual strings and they won't resonate and drone properly against the other strings but I could be totally wrong, I've never tried it or even played one like it. I'm sure the maker has a very good reason why it's done and I am curious to know.


Mike Collins wrote:
I use 12 on flamencos(less tie block wood) & 18 on classicals.
I have used the Gilbert pin style saddles -BUT much more time consuming to set up!
As a difference in sound -Not even one of the great guitarists or musicians with great hearing capacity could tell the difference between a regular saddle & the pin style!
So why other?
Looks neat !
Mike


I did a Gilbert-style (pin saddles) bridge on a recent classical project guitar. As Mike says, lots more work and no discernible difference in sound. It sounds just like a 'regular' bridge to me- certainly doesn't lose anything.
(but I don't have the 'ears' that great builders like John Gilbert were equipped with....)

For some info on the Gilbert bridge, see http://www.schrammguitars.com/gilbertbridge.html at David Schramm's excellent website.
John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 11:21 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:05 am
Posts: 9191
Location: United States
First name: Waddy
Last Name: Thomson
City: Charlotte
State: NC
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Maybe not, but he quit doing it too!

_________________
Waddy

Photobucket Build Album Library

Sound Clips of most of my guitars


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 1:19 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3933
Location: United States
douglas ingram wrote:
"12 and 18 hole bridges to change the break angle of the string over the saddle, which can be a good thing. They also change the torque of the saddle, which may not be a good thing, tough to say."

My opinon, which seems to be backed up by the results of an ongoing experiment I'm running, suggests that break angle, by itself, probably doesn't change the sound of the guitar much, if any. You need to have 'enough', but I'd say that 12-15 degress is certainly enough.

Altering the break anlge doesn't change the amount the top deflects under string load, but seems to slightly alter the _way_ the top deflects. That is: the top dips in front of the bridge, and rises in back of it when you tighten the strings, and total rotation seems to stay the same. However, with a lower break angle the 'dip' is less and the 'rise' is greater, by a small amount, at least on my 'test mule'. I need to get some more measurements on that one.

The break angle does have an effect on the amount of force tipping the saddle forward, all else equal. Basically, the string tension and the break angle together give a 'resultant' of force that bisects the break angle: the force on the saddle top is not just downward but also forward. The greater the break angle, the greater the force pushing the top of the saddle toward the nut. At some point it gets to be great enough to split out the front of the slot, if you're not careful.

One solution to this is to make the saddle slot at an angle back from the vertical. In theory, if the saddle itself bisects the break angle there is no net tipping force on it, and this is how violins get away with such tall skinny bridges.

I use a nine degree back angle. It doesn't eliminate the tipping force, but does reduce it quite a lot. It's also self correcting to some degree, in that, when you raise the action height by putting in a taller saddle, it automatically increases the compensation. Thanks to Rick Turner for that one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 2:03 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:10 pm
Posts: 2485
Location: Argyle New York
First name: Mike/Mikey/Michael/hey you!
Last Name: Collins
City: Argyle
State: New York
Zip/Postal Code: 12809
Country: U.S.A. /America-yea!!
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Alan;
Saddle height above the top and the tieblock height also create more of a twist(forward)cavity in front of the bridge ?
I;ve seen tops destorted by low saddles and very little break angle.
A matter of the braces , top stiffness & thickness ?
And string tension?
Mc

_________________
Mike Collins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 2:49 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:50 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Victoria, BC
First name: John
Last Name: Abercrombie
Status: Amateur
Alan Carruth wrote:
Altering the break angle doesn't change the amount the top deflects under string load, but seems to slightly alter the _way_ the top deflects. That is: the top dips in front of the bridge, and rises in back of it when you tighten the strings, and total rotation seems to stay the same. However, with a lower break angle the 'dip' is less and the 'rise' is greater, by a small amount, at least on my 'test mule'. I need to get some more measurements on that one.


With the wound strings, at some point in the string tightening, it seems to me that the string stops sliding and 'grips' the saddle. So the forces on either side of the saddle are not necessarily equal ?? Thus the tipping idea? And the break angle would affect when the string starts to 'grip' the saddle rather than slide over it....
Some of the theoretical discussions which compare the saddle to the tower in a suspension bridge seem to fail at this point. A true roller saddle would behave differently than a standard bone saddle in this respect.
Luckily, the bridge wood probably deforms enough to spread out the loads from the saddle. Thinking about the 'points of contact' between the saddle and bridge (slot) when the string is tuned up to pitch shows why the fit of the saddle in the slot can affect the tone/volume, etc. - for better or worse.

Cheers
John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2010 9:27 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 1505
Location: Lorette, Manitoba, Canada
First name: Douglas
Last Name: Ingram
City: Lorette
State: Manitoba
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Alan,

That's what I would have said had I the words to say it. Its a MUCH fuller description.

_________________
Expectation is the source of all misery; comparison the thief of joy.
http://redrivercanoe.ca/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2010 1:51 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3933
Location: United States
Mike Collins asked:
"Saddle height above the top and the tieblock height also create more of a twist(forward)cavity in front of the bridge ?"

I don't know about tieblock height: all I changed in my experiment was the saddle height and break angle. I went in with the notion that what happens behind the top of the saddle didn't matter in dertermining the tone, but only effected the static load on the saddle and slot. I found that I was not _quite_ right, although, if there is an effect on tone simply from changing the break angle, I don't have enough data to see it. The top loading does change a little with changes in the break angle, though, even when the string height off the top remains the same, so it could effect the tone.

In terms of string height and top distortion, think of it this way: if the strings could somehow run through the middle of a hollow top (think of a double top with the Nomex removed where the strings are), then there would be no dishing in front of, or humping up behind, the bridge. It's the string height off the top that causes those problems. The higher the strings are off the top, the more the top distorts; I've measured that one so I know. Obviously, if the top is too weak, it will distort more, even with light strings and a low saddle. As usual, we're after a balance here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2010 2:03 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:10 pm
Posts: 2485
Location: Argyle New York
First name: Mike/Mikey/Michael/hey you!
Last Name: Collins
City: Argyle
State: New York
Zip/Postal Code: 12809
Country: U.S.A. /America-yea!!
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Thanks Alan;
As usual you help us all with your data & emphirical knowledge also !
Hey -going to Montreal this year?
I'm doing the Woodstock Invitational again!
I sold guitars there last year!
Can't wait to go again.
If your interested in going there go to www.woodstockinvitational.com
Contact Baker or Sharon for info !
take care
Mike

_________________
Mike Collins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2010 8:24 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3933
Location: United States
I'm headed up to Montreal, in part to deliver an arch classical for their collection. I'll keep the Woodstock show in mind, though: at least I could bring my BRW guitar! Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com