Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sat Jul 26, 2025 11:36 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Top to thin?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:49 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:50 pm
Posts: 120
Location: Stanwood, WA
First name: David
Last Name: Engel
City: Stanwood
State: WA
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Hi All,

Long story short, my Jet 10-20 sander gave me some uneven sanding of my top plates and after glueing them together had to do some serious sanding to get it flat. oops_sign I ended up with a thickness of .103. It's for an OM, unbraced it tapped to a "G". I've never built a guitar with a top this thin. Should I continue or scrap this one? Your experience and advice as always are much appreciated! [:Y:] Thanks.

Dave

_________________
God, Family, Carreer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top to thin?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:55 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5583
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
What kind of wood, how stiff?
How does it feel now?
My latest top is German spruce about that thickness off the sander, but was very stiff.
I've used Sitka at 0.11" that was a bit too floppy, my first at class (lacked top end harmonics)

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top to thin?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 1:03 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:50 pm
Posts: 120
Location: Stanwood, WA
First name: David
Last Name: Engel
City: Stanwood
State: WA
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Hi Collin,

It' Sitka spruce, what Alaska Specialty called "head stock", (base of the tree). It feels fairly stiff to me, but I've only built 10 guitars and don't do any density or stiffness testing and 4 of them were classical's with cedar tops.

Dave

_________________
God, Family, Carreer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top to thin?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 1:07 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
David: I have 3 guitars I'm putting the finish on at the present moment. One is approximate similar to an OM and the top is thinner then yours,the other two are dreads and they are approximately the same as yours. As you no doubt know it depends on stiffness and how you brace and how you expect the end result to sound.As long as you have a nice stiff top and you don't scallop the braces to pieces I think you'll be fine. Remember if you do over build a bit you can always do some work on the braces through the sound hole. Have fun and good luck.
Tom

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top to thin?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 7:31 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:50 pm
Posts: 120
Location: Stanwood, WA
First name: David
Last Name: Engel
City: Stanwood
State: WA
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks for the reply guys! [:Y:]

Is the stiffness testing and hardness testing thing hard to do? Is it worth the equipment and $ to invest in? I guess I'll go ahead with this on. I remeasured and my averave is .105.

Dave

_________________
God, Family, Carreer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top to thin?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 7:55 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:44 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Crownsville, MD
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Lewis
City: Crownsville
State: MD
Zip/Postal Code: 21032
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I hope you have a good glue joint! I think joinery & craftsmanship becomes much more critical when you get this thin.

You could always string it up first with light gauge strings and see how it behaves. You could also brace the heck out of it. It's thinner than I would want to build with...but I'd probably finish it out just to see what it does. I would go ahead and make it a guitar, but I'd put it on a nice cheap set of wood.

Some tops are stable enough & stiff enough to get away with this...and some aren't! Unfortunately, you don't learn anything until something breaks.. :D

Trev

_________________
http://www.PeakeGuitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top to thin?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:57 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 3:41 pm
Posts: 708
Location: Bothell, WA USA
First name: Jim
Last Name: Hansen
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Dave,

Is the rosette routed and sanded yet?

_________________
Jim Hansen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top to thin?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:29 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:50 pm
Posts: 120
Location: Stanwood, WA
First name: David
Last Name: Engel
City: Stanwood
State: WA
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
No Jim,

No hole, or rosette, just the cut out periphery.

_________________
God, Family, Carreer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top to thin?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:52 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:27 pm
Posts: 2109
Location: South Carolina
First name: John
Last Name: Cox
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Use it.
Don't listen to the folks who say it will implode -- it won't if you do your job making good glue joints.

My Esteban Retop Dreadnought has a Sitka top that started at about 0.103" before I did any levelling (And it was *Rough* before levelling... I thinned it out a bunch.) .... I put Cumpiano book bracing on it.... and I still had to do a bunch of brace shaving below the bridge before it would sound right with Medium strings and a "Standard Martin" factory setup action height on it.... I haven't had any problems overdriving it... even with medium strings and heavy flat-picking.

Sure, it has some belly -- but well within "Martin" factory specs for such.

I will give you this advice:
Make sure there are no gaps between the sides of the bridge plate and the X-legs.
Make sure your X-brace joint is tight, and well capped.
Make sure you have adequate soundhole reinforcement
Make sure you have a "Standard" amount of top dome.. I personally wouldn't go flat or with too much dome either.
Leave the bracing "Parabolic" and "Straight" or "Tapered" above the bridge -- no scalloping between the Bridge saddle and the UTB.
Use a "Standard" profile bridge with wings overlapping the X-brace legs

Thanks

John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top to thin?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:22 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:40 pm
Posts: 505
First name: David
Last Name: Malicky
City: San Diego
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 92111
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
For what is "too thin", I think it depends on what you would consider to be a "problem". Somogyi's book says his "steel string guitar tops will usually be significantly less than 0.100" ", but (paraphrasing greatly:) he doesn't consider settling in (telegraphed braces) to necessarily be a problem, and may actually be good for tone. Personally, I like the "responsive" approach, but it does have some risks. I finished my first thin topped (0.100") guitar 3 weeks ago -- it has been fine so far.

The older Taylor GAs were 0.110" thick; if a factory can do that w/o testing the wood, 0.105" should be fine so long as your top isn't a complete noodle.

Here's a simple way to do stiffness testing w/o a jig or dial indicator:
- Get two 1/2" thick x 16+" long sticks and place 18" apart, on a flat board or table.
- Place the top on these lengthwise.
- Place a ~1x2x16" across the top at the halfway point.
- Use sticks of various thickness to measure the gap; this measurement corrects for bow in the top. Try to measure to within +/- 1/32".
- Find 5 lb worth of weight and place on the 1x2, distributed evenly across the top.
- Measure the new gap with various thickness sticks.
- Subtract the measurements for the deflection.
- Turn the top over and repeat. Most builders take the average of the two readings. In my experience, if the two #s are much different, it's because the top was heavily warped and not resting evenly on the supports (I would resticker in that case).
- I gather that many builders shoot for 0.20" to 0.25" deflection (5 lb weight, 18" span).

_________________
David Malicky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top to thin?
PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:59 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:23 am
Posts: 1372
First name: Corky
Last Name: Long
City: Mount Kisco
State: NY
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
One more vote for "build with it"!

I'm also at a point where I dont' have enough experience to know what's "too thin" based on feel. Good argument to start deflection testing all your (and mine :P ) tops and keeping good records.

If your careful with the final sanding on the soundboard I don't think you'll have any problem - I'd simply voice the top once the braces are on it with the awareness that the top is a bit thinner than usual.

Another vote on the extra care on joints and fit - we should all be doing this anyway, but....

Also - if you generally string your guitars with mediums, you may need to use lights on this one.

Good luck.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com