Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Jul 27, 2025 5:44 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:09 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3933
Location: United States
Greg E wrote:
"Alan you make some good points about us all needing to use the same apparatus and method to have the data be really useful. I don't have a deflection testing setup yet, so I'm game to build whatever is a reasonable for all of us."

Actually, I see no ned for us all to do the tests in the same way, just so we get comperable results from our different setups and, more importantly, express them in ways everybody can use. There are several methods for finding the Young's modulus along and across the grain. Each of them has it's own drawbacks in terms of accuracy, cost and time. It would be nice if we could get everybody to 'calibrate' their own setup, using some 'standard' pieces of wood or something, but realistically that's not likely to happen. This will necessarily limit the usefulness of the comparative data. However, I don't see this as being a big problem for us. None of us is working so close to the line, as it were, that a small error will make a large difference. It would be one thing is we were building these things to go into orbit, say, where a few grams one way or the other would make the difference between success and failure. With a bunch of builders making non-standardised items, and judging them subjectively for tone for the most part, we're going to get more from watching trends than exact numbers. Knowing that, say. less dense tops work 'better' for classicals, and more dense ones for Bluegrass Dreads, will help us all to sort our tops for best utility. Some comparitive data on stiffness ratios will help us to figure out just how floppy a top you can get away with and still make a good Jumbo.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:54 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:26 am
Posts: 1041
Location: sweden
First name: Lars
Last Name: Stahl
City: Stockholm
Country: Sweden
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Just wanted to know if anyone has gotten any further on this matter ?

Lars.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:20 pm 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 2:52 am
Posts: 44
Location: Canada
Lars:

I'm still interested in pursuing this topic, but [as most small time builders] lately my personal life has taken priority over my building projects.

Perhaps this thread can be revisited by others with more time and resources, so an actual sharing of data can occur.

Thanks... Greg


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 12:26 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:57 pm
Posts: 636
Location: Nr London, UK
Brock Poling wrote:
When you use the jig, make sure your soundboards are glued up square like this one (different shapes will alter your results, so for consistancy sake try to keep them like this).


As soundboard shape affects the results is there a standard size they should be trimmed to, to achieve consistent results?

_________________
Formerly JJH

I learn more from my mistakes than my successes


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Mark L. and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com