Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Aug 08, 2025 12:16 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:05 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:30 am
Posts: 1792
Location: United States
Here are pics of the bracing from a B-4 (12 fret 0 alike) I built last year. It's a Carpathian top, I do not recall the exact thickness, probably around .105". Red spruce braces, 4" soundhole. The apex of the X is located 10 1/8" from the 12th fret (top of body) and the angle is exactly 90ยบ. I definitely think one tone bar is more than enough on most 12 fret designs. Not sure how close to the Martin design it is, probably not very far.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Laurent Brondel
West Paris, Maine - USA
http://www.laurentbrondel.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:28 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:21 am
Posts: 4915
Location: Central PA
First name: john
Last Name: hall
City: Hegins
State: pa
Zip/Postal Code: 17938
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
if you want a true Martin style you will have only 1 tone bar and only 1 finger brace on both the 12 and 14 fret. Also there is no need to forward the braces on the martin plot as that is where the forward shift would be. The only bracing that was moved back was the Dred , the other patterns of the day were not touched . Moving the bracing more forward is okay but it isn't true to the martin.

_________________
John Hall
blues creek guitars
Authorized CF Martin Repair
Co President of ASIA
You Don't know what you don't know until you know it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:37 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:51 am
Posts: 3786
Location: Canada
not sure exactly where i got this, but most likely on this forum somewhere ... 0-18, 1937


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Tony Karol
www.karol-guitars.com
"let my passion .. fulfill yours"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 2:29 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:02 pm
Posts: 801
Location: United States
First name: Gene
Last Name: Zierdt
City: Sebastopol
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 95472
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I found pictures of several 0 size Martin's bracing over on the UMGF Bracing Library a couple of years ago. I just did a couple of searches over there, but couldn't find them again. I know I have
them on my computer at home, along with CAD dxf files I generated from them. I'm returning from a trip tonight, I can send them to you tomorrow if you like. PM me if you want them.

_________________
Gene

Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason- Mark Twain


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 2:33 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 10:11 am
Posts: 2221
Filippo,

Mine is basically identical to the one Tony showed.

You are welcome to a copy of the plan.
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:13 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:21 am
Posts: 4915
Location: Central PA
First name: john
Last Name: hall
City: Hegins
State: pa
Zip/Postal Code: 17938
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
only one finger and tone bar THe lower ones are omitted

_________________
John Hall
blues creek guitars
Authorized CF Martin Repair
Co President of ASIA
You Don't know what you don't know until you know it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:50 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:55 pm
Posts: 698
Location: Australia
Filippo

I build the 14 fret and I move the X as far forward as I can whilst still having the lower arms sit beneath the bridge wings.

I feel that you can do this on the 14 fretter because the shorter length of the body will dictate a greater stiffness along the grain regardless of the properties of the wood.

The 0-16NY that you are building will be around 1.5" longer so it would be probably wise to stick to a more traditional (ie Martin) X brace position.

Having said that you could always forward shift it as much as you can and if it fails you've learned something.

It's not that difficult to replace a top -- really. :D

_________________

------------------------------------------------------
Bob Connor
Geelong, Australia


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:07 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 1:41 am
Posts: 1157
Location: Siloam Springs, AR
Todd Stock wrote:
Is it just me, or are there others out there a little reluctant to stick the 'parlor' moniker on anything that's smaller than a dread? Keep in mind that the 0 was the largest of the Martin bodies for a good long time, and was seen as providing the volume necessary for larger venues. Parlors - at least the room - were relatively small space which would not have required much in the way of size to get acceptable volume levels.

In recent years, folks have begun to refer to 000's as 'small bodies', while manufacturers and the sales force at GC seem to have applied the term to pretty much any smaller instrument.

Not really rationale - I know - but I reserve the parlor label for guitars smaller than the 0 bodies.


I tend to refer to an 0 size as a parlor, but definitely nothing bigger than that. I know that's technically not right, but it seems like it's about the smallest standard tuning guitar that's commonly available today. If it's a Martin I would definitely refer to it as an 0 if that's what it is.

_________________
______________________________
Jonathan Kendall, Siloam Springs AR


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:23 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:58 am
Posts: 31
First name: David
Last Name: Mrozinski
City: Essexville
State: MI
Zip/Postal Code: 48732
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Don't see soundhole reinforcement Is that a normal for a parlor size guitar?


Thanks
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:09 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:09 am
Posts: 841
Location: Auburn, California
First name: Hank
Last Name: Mauel
City: Auburn
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 95603
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I don't have any photos of my Shasta Parlor innards, but they are very similar to the Tony Karol photo. I don't use the popsicle brace under the fingerboard extension since I have my "tongue" support in that area. My X brace intersection is 1 1/8" down from the soundhole rim and I do not tuck the tone bar or wing brace ends into the lining.

Now we'll open the bookmaking side of the forum.
What are the odds that your son's guitar will upstage yours? idunno

_________________
Hank Mauel


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:07 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 am
Posts: 2593
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Danny
Last Name: Vincent
Fillippo, it's great to see more parlours happening. I did mine using Scott Antes plans. It's a great looking shape and very versatile. It's become my go to guitar. This is almost from the plan.
Attachment:
php9uuf6yAM.jpg

A ya, hear in the northern latitudes we favour the tone bar going opposite to the way to most. [headinwall] . I'll probably try it the other way next time.

I hope to do others with with some different wood combinations. This one is Sitka/maple. It has a whole lot of punch.

Keep us posted.

Enjoy The Day,
Danny


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 12:42 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:16 am
Posts: 2692
To my traditionalist view, "parlor" implies not only smaller than 0, but also a shape with a gentle bend at the waist. 12-fret neck, of course. This is Dana Bourgeois's.

Image

_________________
Howard Klepper
http://www.klepperguitars.com

When all else fails, clean the shop.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:42 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:09 am
Posts: 841
Location: Auburn, California
First name: Hank
Last Name: Mauel
City: Auburn
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 95603
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Filippo Morelli wrote:
If it's a competition, I'll ditch the red spruce top on mine and go with redwood. Not very traditional sounding, but it will smooth out the highs and bring in the bass.

Filippo


Absolutely! You'll love redwood. Most of my Shasta models have gone out with redwood tops, but usually on black walnut bodies.
Image

_________________
Hank Mauel


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com