Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Jul 27, 2025 5:18 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Neck set ?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:47 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 am
Posts: 2593
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Danny
Last Name: Vincent
Good Morning,

#2 is ready for final sanding and buffing. Yay! Before I do I just wanted to be sure the neck angle and height above the bridge with a straight edge is acceptable.
Attachment:
php0kW3BePM.jpg

There is about 1/8" between bridge and straight edge. The frets are in but no leveling has been done. The neck is flat, no relief. I still need to skin a hair off the underside, outside edge of the bridge to accomadate the finish.
Attachment:
phpYhIu2gPM.jpg

And another photo.

Thanks for your help,
Danny :)


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck set ?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:40 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:03 am
Posts: 6680
Location: Abbotsford, BC Canada
Hi Danny,

That's to high. Your saddle will be very very high and cause a lot of torque on the bridge, especially the front edge.

If you think about the geometry. Wanting to have say 0.095-0.110" action on the low E string, you have to multiply that by 2 for the bridge height. So if you start with 0.125" clearance between the fret plane and the top of the bridge, you'll have almost a 1/4" of saddle sticking out of the bridge, which is pretty high.

I like to have no more than 1/16" and prefer to have 1/32" or a smidge less of a gap between the top of the bridge and the plane of the fret board with the frets on. But between 1/32" and 1/16" is ok too. The top will pull up and the neck pull forward when the strings are on and after a couple of weeks, the guitar will have settled into it's basic state (changing over time from the string pull, but only minutely year to year, generally speaking of course) and this will allow the saddle to be about 1/8"-3/16" over the top of the bridge.

_________________
My Facebook Guitar Page

"There's really no wrong way, as long as the results are what's desired." Charles Fox

"We have to constantly remind ourselves what we're doing....No Luthier is putting a man on the moon!" Harry Fleishman

"Generosity is always different in the eye of the person who didn't receive anything, but who wanted some." Waddy Thomson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck set ?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:22 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:03 am
Posts: 6680
Location: Abbotsford, BC Canada
Well, my math is off by a bit in my first post.

It should have been

Rod True wrote:
If you think about the geometry. Wanting to have say 0.095-0.110" action on the low E string, you have to multiply that by 2 for the saddle height. So if you start with 0.125" clearance between the fret plane and the top of the bridge, you'll have about 3/8" of saddle sticking out of the bridge, which is pretty high.

_________________
My Facebook Guitar Page

"There's really no wrong way, as long as the results are what's desired." Charles Fox

"We have to constantly remind ourselves what we're doing....No Luthier is putting a man on the moon!" Harry Fleishman

"Generosity is always different in the eye of the person who didn't receive anything, but who wanted some." Waddy Thomson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck set ?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:28 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:09 pm
Posts: 349
Location: Washington, GA
Danny,

I'll second what Rod says. I shoot for 1/32-1/16" as well.

_________________
Brad Tucker


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck set ?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:56 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:59 pm
Posts: 2103
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Country: Romania
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Sorry to hijack a little, but it would result that in theory, without frets, the line should be touching the bridge, take or add a hair? And the bridge is normally about 1/3" tall? I'm planing to start building an OM and it seem the geometry is even more different than what i thought. With my classical guitars I got the unfretted FB plane to be only 1/8 above the guitar top, or even less.

_________________
Build log


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck set ?
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:20 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:30 pm
Posts: 1041
Location: United States
With frets installed, the straight edge should be 1/16" above the top of the bridge....1/32" minimum, but 1/16" would
be best.

Take the time to get it right now and you'll be happy that you did.

All the best,
Kevin Gallagher/Omega Guitars


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck set ?
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:57 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 4:01 pm
Posts: 1104
Location: Winfield, IL.
Yes Alex, you are correct.
I set my neck without frets and place my straight edge right on top of the bridge minimum to 1/32" above maximum.

Steve


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck set ?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:53 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:23 am
Posts: 2356
Location: United States
I second what Kevin said. I personally shoot for the 1/16th measurement. It gives me a bit more wiggle room for adjusting the action during the first year of the guitar's life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck set ?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:13 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 am
Posts: 2593
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Danny
Last Name: Vincent
Thanks all! Necks on, bridge is glued. I'm so close I can almost hear it.

Danny


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck set ?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:25 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 3445
Location: Alexandria MN
I'm with everyone else on 1/16" clearance. You can support the headstock and put 5 or 6 lbs of weight on each shoulder and get a ball park idea where it will be under string tension. The straightedge should just barely clear
the front of the bridge.
Terry

_________________
It's not what you don't know that hurts you, it's what you do know that's wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck set ?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:42 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 am
Posts: 2593
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Danny
Last Name: Vincent
Thanks for the great tip Terry. I'm a little late for it to make a difference now but it's locked away, well, maybe I should write it down........

Thanks Again,
Danny


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com