Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 11:54 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 7:54 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 497
Location: United States
Status: Amateur
AlexM wrote:
Several things to consider:


There is one downside though: you often lose the joint line when aligning plates to the sides or the neck to body, that can really be annoying. gaah


I have only joined a few times but all were successfully joined using the sanding method. Since I have few tools this is an easy way that meets my needs.

When joining I offset the plates by just a bit at the end of the joint. When glued up the small raised area on either end of the joint allows you to find the center of the joint regardless of how invisible it is. It just makes the plate a little easier to work with. [:Y:]

Philip

_________________
aka konacat

If you think my playing is bad you should hear me sing!
Practice breeds confidence and confidence breeds competence. Unfortunately, I'm stuck in practice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:07 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:58 am
Posts: 2774
Location: Tampa, Florida USA
Or file the inside corners so that a V is at each end of the center line/joint when glued up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:29 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 1:11 pm
Posts: 2390
Location: Spokane, Washington
First name: Pat
Last Name: Foster
Country: USA
Focus: Build
archtop wrote:
BTW, does anyone know how the antique Stanley's are "out of the box"? I'm talking about the ones that have never been used and have no surface rust or defects. I don't have experience with them, but I would assume they need to be tuned, have their soles flattened perfectly, etc... Anyone ever try an oldie "out of the box"?


Old Stanleys, even unused, will need some tuning, though perhaps less than newer planes of equal quality. New Stanleys are not in the same class IMHO.

The older ones have more accurate, heavier castings and better steel in the irons, but may still need to have the soles flattened and the irons finessed.

I love my old Stanleys.

Pat

_________________
formerly known around here as burbank
_________________

http://www.patfosterguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:15 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 3:58 pm
Posts: 429
Location: Cottonwood, California USA
First name: Darrin
Last Name: Oilar
City: Cottonwood
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 96022
Focus: Build
Pat Foster wrote:
archtop wrote:
BTW, does anyone know how the antique Stanley's are "out of the box"? I'm talking about the ones that have never been used and have no surface rust or defects. I don't have experience with them, but I would assume they need to be tuned, have their soles flattened perfectly, etc... Anyone ever try an oldie "out of the box"?


Old Stanleys, even unused, will need some tuning, though perhaps less than newer planes of equal quality. New Stanleys are not in the same class IMHO.

The older ones have more accurate, heavier castings and better steel in the irons, but may still need to have the soles flattened and the irons finessed.

I love my old Stanleys.

Pat



I have heard that often when you get that beautiful never been used antique Stanley, that you may find that there is a reason it had never been used...namely that the sole was warped or similar problems. You may be better off finding one that looks like someone used it daily for 40 years. Get Garret Hack's Handplane Book, there is a ton of information regarding tuning and using.

Darrin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:36 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:48 am
Posts: 2094
darrin wrote:
Pat Foster wrote:
Old Stanleys, even unused, will need some tuning, though perhaps less than newer planes of equal quality. New Stanleys are not in the same class IMHO.

The older ones have more accurate, heavier castings and better steel in the irons, but may still need to have the soles flattened and the irons finessed.

I love my old Stanleys.

Pat



I have heard that often when you get that beautiful never been used antique Stanley, that you may find that there is a reason it had never been used...namely that the sole was warped or similar problems. You may be better off finding one that looks like someone used it daily for 40 years. Get Garret Hack's Handplane Book, there is a ton of information regarding tuning and using.

Darrin


Amen to that.

All my Stanleys have the initials of the previous owners stamped into the side- most of the time these planes that were once owned by professional carpenters in the trade would have been looked after well. Nine times out of then the soles are flat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:07 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:48 am
Posts: 2094
Thanks for the valuable information, Todd.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:47 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:56 am
Posts: 225
Location: United States
Great information on this thread. I've always set up various straight edges and sandpaper
and have had good results. I asked a friend who is an acoustic physics expert and interested
in machining and tool making to help me design a fixture for preparing surfaces for glue-up.
He worked with a metal fabrication firm in Los Alamos where he currently works (co-inventor of acoustic refrigeration, a concept that eludes me even though he has explained it to me many times), and said the apparatus would be ready in a couple week. I'll send photos, it's just
a way to produce dead-flat surfaces and make joining tops and backs a bit easier.
Knowing him, it will be over-engineered but should address the problem well. Photos as
soon as it arrives.

Best
Bruce

_________________
Bruce Herrmann
"What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 4:59 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:58 am
Posts: 2774
Location: Tampa, Florida USA
I spent 2 months bidding on Stanly Sweetheart planes. I won 2-#5 , #4 and #7 (not a sweetheart). I spent from $50-$75 for them. Good luck getting anything worth while for $35.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:25 am 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:04 pm
Posts: 63
Location: North Wales, Pa.
ToddStock wrote:

For the record, the cost differences are minimal for the low angle jack and block planes, while for standard bench planes (#4, #4.5, #5, #5.5), the LNs run 30-50 percent more for what is a much better tool. Certainly nothing like twice the cost for the LN. In terms of preferences, for low angle jacks and jointers, I'd go with the LV - especially if you are a beginner and need the training wheel features. For bevel down planes and for the blocks, the LNs are a better bet.

Both LV and LN run a very tight tolerance for the sole flatness; LN does a slightly better job of flattening their A2 blades and chip breakers, while LV has sort of a distinct design ethic that is either judged to be butt ugly (my view) or the most beautiful tools in the world.




Todd,

Thanks for the clarification. The plane I was refering to was the low angle jointer. I appologize for any confusion caused by this omission.

_________________
- Ben Pak
North Wales, Pa.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:13 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 1505
Location: Lorette, Manitoba, Canada
First name: Douglas
Last Name: Ingram
City: Lorette
State: Manitoba
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
ToddStock wrote:
For the record, the cost differences are minimal for the low angle jack and block planes, while for standard bench planes (#4, #4.5, #5, #5.5), the LNs run 30-50 percent more for what is a much better tool. Certainly nothing like twice the cost for the LN.

#4: LV ($215 + $13 shipping = $228; LN $300 (with either York or common); the first significant difference in price, but the $77 is well worth it for a much better smoother with a more comfortable handle.


It also depends on where you are.

For example, I can go down to my local Lee Valley store and pick up a #4 smoother for $215 CDN. The LN #4 (iron) is $300 US + $8 shipping = $308 US. The dollar exchange has changed these last few weeks, so at today's rate, that works out to $398.64 CDN.

So, in my hands, that is a $184 difference.

_________________
Expectation is the source of all misery; comparison the thief of joy.
http://redrivercanoe.ca/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:30 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:23 pm
Posts: 1694
Location: United States
First name: Lillian
Last Name: Fuller-Watson
State: WA
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
douglas ingram wrote:
ToddStock wrote:
For the record, the cost differences are minimal for the low angle jack and block planes, while for standard bench planes (#4, #4.5, #5, #5.5), the LNs run 30-50 percent more for what is a much better tool. Certainly nothing like twice the cost for the LN.

#4: LV ($215 + $13 shipping = $228; LN $300 (with either York or common); the first significant difference in price, but the $77 is well worth it for a much better smoother with a more comfortable handle.


It also depends on where you are.

For example, I can go down to my local Lee Valley store and pick up a #4 smoother for $215 CDN. The LN #4 (iron) is $300 US + $8 shipping = $308 US. The dollar exchange has changed these last few weeks, so at today's rate, that works out to $398.64 CDN.

So, in my hands, that is a $184 difference.


Douglas, I'm confused by your numbers. I went to the Lee Valley website and the price for a #4 smoother is $215 CDN, yes, but it is also $215 US Dollar. These are the prices that come up when I selected the different currencies. I'm not sure which of us is getting the better deal out of this though. I guess Lee Valley doesn't want to track the fluid exchange rates and just sets it price. We'll either accept them or go shopping else where.

_________________
Aoibeann


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:25 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 1505
Location: Lorette, Manitoba, Canada
First name: Douglas
Last Name: Ingram
City: Lorette
State: Manitoba
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
For the last few months, the Canadian and US dollar were trading at equal value. This last couple of weeks, has seen some change with the CDN$ being set at about $0.80. It was up today. I doubt that the Lee Valley catalog is fast enough to react.

Here is what they say on the website about currency:

"The Lee Valley e-commerce site is a multi-currency site. Our pages display prices in either Canadian funds or U.S. funds. The International currency setting displays prices in U.S. funds.

On your first visit, you will be asked to select a currency before browsing. After that, we will read your currency setting from your "cookies". If placing an order, your currency setting must match the country of your designated shipping address."


In my post I was trying to quibble about exact pricing, but rather demonstrating that the comparative cost of a tool changes on where you are and how you have to buy it.

So, for Todd the price difference between LV and LN might not be great, for someone else it can be far greater. And if he made the LV purchase yesterday, he would have been able to take advantage of the favorable exchange rate, but for me, buying the LN plane, I would have been at a disadvantage.

_________________
Expectation is the source of all misery; comparison the thief of joy.
http://redrivercanoe.ca/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:53 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:23 pm
Posts: 1694
Location: United States
First name: Lillian
Last Name: Fuller-Watson
State: WA
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Yes.

_________________
Aoibeann


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 8:36 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 1505
Location: Lorette, Manitoba, Canada
First name: Douglas
Last Name: Ingram
City: Lorette
State: Manitoba
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
douglas ingram wrote:
In my post I was trying to quibble about exact pricing, but rather demonstrating that the comparative cost of a tool changes on where you are and how you have to buy it.


I mispelt.

WASN'T.

I wasn't trying to quibble. Sorry for any misunderstanding that this may have caused.

_________________
Expectation is the source of all misery; comparison the thief of joy.
http://redrivercanoe.ca/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:31 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:41 pm
Posts: 975
Location: United States
First name: Tracy
Last Name: Leveque
City: Denver
State: CO
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
skinnysteel wrote:
I recently got Tracys "easy Jointer" and it seem to work great ! did 3 tops in a few minutes ! ( havent glued them yet though :D but I candled them and it looks great. :shock:
Thanks Tracy for a great jig.

Lars.


:oops: Aw shucks! Thanks Lars, glad you are enjoying your jig. I use it too, and love it! I can joint a top in 10 strokes or less usually and never had a joint come apart because of using sandpaper. Our sandpaper is 120 grit 3m gold stickit.

_________________
Tracy
http://www.luthiersuppliers.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:03 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 169
Tracy, I've been thinking more and more about getting The Easy Jointer. Today I watched the video of Kathy Matsushita using it and I couldn't believe what a cinch it was!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:26 am 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:49 am
Posts: 13630
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
First name: Hesh
Last Name: Breakstone
City: Ann Arbor
State: Michigan
Country: United States
Status: Professional
I have one of Tracy's very fine Easy-Jointers too and it works great! [:Y:] [clap] [clap] [clap] [clap] [clap]

The one time that I have had the opportunity to try it out I had a perfect joint in less than one minute.

Attachment:
DSC01454.jpg


Attachment:
DSC01456.jpg


My name is Hesh and I approve this message...... :D


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: J De Rocher, Michaeldc and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com