Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Aug 17, 2025 4:52 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 3:11 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 2580
First name: Jay
Last Name: De Rocher
City: Bothell
State: Washington
Does anyone know how big the +/- ranges around the values for wood properties in the wood database are in general? 10%, 20%, 40%? I imagine it varies with species, but I'm wondering how much the mechanical and physical properties of different species actually overlap in the real world. For example Sitka and Engelmann appear to have some substantial differences in the numbers below but if the +/- on the numbers is large, then there could be many top sets of these species that would be indistinguishable in terms of these properties. On the other hand, Sitka and Red appear to be quite similar, but if the +/- is large, there would be individual top sets of each that would be distinctly different, which I expect is the case.


Sitka Spruce White Spruce Red Spruce Engelmann Spruce
Avg dry weight 27 lb/ft3 27 lb/ft3 27 lb/ft3 24 lb/ft3
Spec gravity 0.42 0.43 0.43 0.39
Janka hardness 510 480 490 390
Modulus of rupture 10,150 8,640 9,580 9,010
Elastic modulus 1,600,000 1,315,000 1,560,000 1,369,000

These numbers are from the Wood Database web site (http://www.wood-database.com/about/) and I believe are taken from the USDA Wood Handbook.

_________________
Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right - Robert Hunter



These users thanked the author J De Rocher for the post: dzsmith (Wed Sep 10, 2014 5:59 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 3:15 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 2580
First name: Jay
Last Name: De Rocher
City: Bothell
State: Washington
Argh. I can't figure out how to preserve the table format for the numbers. I think you all can figure it out though.

_________________
Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right - Robert Hunter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 5:37 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 6:02 pm
Posts: 232
First name: sam
Last Name: guidry
State: michigan
Country: us
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
In the wood I have measured ( thousands of sets) I have found a very wide variation in material properties. So much so that I do not view top wood material properties by species but as individual examples that can be on either extreme of the "average" properties that are commonly listed in wood engineering literature


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 5:53 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:47 pm
Posts: 1213
Location: Raleigh, NC
First name: Ringo
There is a lot of variation and overlap between species. The key to spruces (as far as it fits our purposes IMO) is density... weight tracks longitudinal stiffness in a pretty linear fashion so that a heavy Englemann and a light Red spruce can be very similar on a finished guitar.

In other words you will find that a 100g spruce top is likely very close in long grain stiffness to any other 100g spruce top, regardless of species.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 7:13 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Yes, lots of variation and overlap within and between species. Long grain Young's modulus within a species can vary by a factor of two, for example. Measured properties are also dependent on the quality of the cut. How well a piece is quartered will significantly alter its measured cross grain stiffness. The better guitar design and build books have tables of material properties for the commonly used guitar woods along with their standard deviation and include how to measure these properties and what to do about it. Obviously, building to dimensional targets is a recipe for substantial variation in acoustical performance.

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 7:28 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 5:46 am
Posts: 2997
Location: United States
James Ringelspaugh wrote:
. .... weight tracks longitudinal stiffness in a pretty linear fashion so that a heavy Englemann and a light Red spruce can be very similar on a finished guitar.

In other words you will find that a 100g spruce top is likely very close in long grain stiffness to any other 100g spruce top, regardless of species.


While this is statistically true, there are exceptions to this for sure.

_________________
Jim Watts
http://jameswattsguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 5:36 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:34 am
Posts: 3081
I have never found Englemann and red spruce to have any similar qualities tonewise. Never get the headroom with Englemann that you get with red spruce. In addition, I find red spruce (no matter what the individual tops numbers) builds a fundamental sounding instrument, while Englemann builds a complex sounding instrument.
I really don't find much use for such information as it just clouds your mind with an overload of numbers.
Must be pretty important for those that build by numbers though...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 5:36 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5968
From what I've seen, the "lower" grades of Engelmann spruce tend to be heavier (stiffer) and look more like red spruce than the creamy white (lighter and softer) "higher" grades of Engelmann. Some of the ugly Engelmann I've used seemed like it had plenty of headroom.YMMV


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 6:33 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:34 am
Posts: 3081
Yea, I've got 40-60 of those A grade Englemann tops, stiff, but they still don't make it compared to my red and sound like mushy German spruce, complex but not half the power of real German. Most have the compression grain, but just don't have the power. I use them for popsicle braces and doublers around the soundhole between UTB and LTB or X and UTB. Been my experience that only red sounds like red.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com