Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Jul 27, 2025 4:28 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 5:08 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:07 am
Posts: 802
Location: Cobourg ON
First name: Steve
Last Name: Denvir
City: Baltimore
State: ON
Zip/Postal Code: K0K 1C0
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I've been using z-poxy, and I've been happy with the results, but I was wondering if there was a faster alternative. By the time you put 2 or 3 coats on, with 24 hours in between, well, I start to get impatient :-)

Thanks in advance

Steve


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 5:11 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:03 am
Posts: 6680
Location: Abbotsford, BC Canada
Anything water based will be faster however you won't get the grain "pop" that epoxy offers. There certainly are trade offs.

Shellac/egg white and wood dust is pretty fast too.

_________________
My Facebook Guitar Page

"There's really no wrong way, as long as the results are what's desired." Charles Fox

"We have to constantly remind ourselves what we're doing....No Luthier is putting a man on the moon!" Harry Fleishman

"Generosity is always different in the eye of the person who didn't receive anything, but who wanted some." Waddy Thomson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 5:17 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:03 am
Posts: 1737
Location: Litchfield MI
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Timbermate is my second choice to Zpoxy

I pretty much have dismissed the WB clear fillers -- many coats and when you have enough on dark woods you can start to see the silica.

_________________
Ken Cierp

http://www.kennethmichaelguitars.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 5:26 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 7547
First name: Ed
Last Name: Bond
City: Nanaimo
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
CA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 5:35 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:42 pm
Posts: 2360
Location: Windsor Ontario Canada
First name: Fred
Last Name: Tellier
City: Windsor
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: N8T2C6
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Steve when I used Z-poxy I found that I could sand and re-coat after 8 to 10 hours if the ambient temperature was above 70 deg F and even shorter as the temperature increased.

Fred

_________________
Fred Tellier
http://www.fetellierguitars.com
Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/pages/FE-Tellier-Guitars/163451547003866



These users thanked the author Fred Tellier for the post: kencierp (Thu Jan 07, 2016 6:00 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 5:41 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:03 am
Posts: 6680
Location: Abbotsford, BC Canada
I've used CA as a pore filler enough (8 of 12 guitars) to decide stop using it for pore filling. Once you fill the neck and guitar (using a full face respirator) you need to vacate the shop for several hours, leaving an exhaust fan one. I've never been able to fully fill with one coat of CA so repeating is needed, thus leaving the shop again for a few hours to let the fumes exhaust....

_________________
My Facebook Guitar Page

"There's really no wrong way, as long as the results are what's desired." Charles Fox

"We have to constantly remind ourselves what we're doing....No Luthier is putting a man on the moon!" Harry Fleishman

"Generosity is always different in the eye of the person who didn't receive anything, but who wanted some." Waddy Thomson



These users thanked the author Rod True for the post: kencierp (Thu Jan 07, 2016 6:00 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 5:44 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:59 pm
Posts: 385
First name: Ken
Last Name: Lewis
City: Mt. Pearl
State: NL
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Why the rush?
Timbermate or any old waterbased filler will be quicker but if you want the grain depth to show in the finish,
epoxy is it. West for me. It's even slower but it is perfectly clear and doesn't shrink back as a few others and
myself have noticed about z-poxy after a year or so. I'll even use Lepages from HD for necks where I want to
even out the grain. Most fillers will subdue the grain, epoxy makes it stand out.
Ken


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 7:30 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 8:35 pm
Posts: 2660
First name: D
Last Name: S
State: TX
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Shellac and wood dust works great for me.
The shellac imparts some "pop" to the figure.

_________________
wah
Wah-wah-wah-wah
Wah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:50 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:12 pm
Posts: 6994
First name: Mike
Last Name: O'Melia
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I'm with the "why the rush" school. The build process is by far the time consumer. 3 days for a magic pore fill is a small time dent. After that, I spend way more time with spraying, sanding, spraying, finish sanding and buffing. I get it though. It sucks that it takes 8-12 hours to cure one coat of epoxy when our finishes dry in 30 minutes (I did not say cure)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:13 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
I've had good luck with one coat of z-poxy and a wash coat of thinned z-poxy using the method linked below. I find it goes pretty quick and I love the way it pops the grain.

viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=39046&p=511914&hilit=razor#p511914


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:34 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:12 pm
Posts: 6994
First name: Mike
Last Name: O'Melia
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
My personal experience seems to mirror Todd Stock's. This is a preference thing. I don't want any pores showing. I know that no matter what I do, if there is a surface imperfection, the finish is eventually going to sink into it. So I'm going to (a la Todd) put 3 coats on. So I have something to work with. Sand back but not all the way to wood. But here is the rub. There cannot be thick and thin areas. Or you will sand through the finish on the "humps". It's not an easy process.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:41 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:12 pm
Posts: 6994
First name: Mike
Last Name: O'Melia
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
The beauty of epoxy is that it does not shrink. Nada. Three coats means three thin, even coats. As Todd suggested, work that first coat and work it and work it till it so completely fills every pore. Work the second coat too. Carefully sand between coats. Third coat should be thin. Then a wash coat. Make sure you minimize ridges at at each stage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:54 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:06 pm
Posts: 2739
Location: Magnolia DE
First name: Brian
Last Name: Howard
City: Magnolia
State: Delaware
Zip/Postal Code: 19962
Country: United States
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
I use prestec polyester. 3 coats 20 minutes apart then wait 24 hours and level sand and apply any finish you like.

_________________
Brian

You never know what you are capable of until you actually try.

https://www.howardguitarsdelaware.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:59 am 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:49 am
Posts: 13634
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
First name: Hesh
Last Name: Breakstone
City: Ann Arbor
State: Michigan
Country: United States
Status: Professional
To Fred's point I typically keep my shop at 72F and could sand the Z-Poxy after only 6 hours.

Over the years my approach with Z-Poxy or West morphed as I thought that I am understanding the process better.

One of the big challenges initially with ep*xy pore filling is getting the stuff to stick into the bottom of the pores. Mirroring Mike Doolan I played around with the viscosity and it helped me a great deal.

My first coat is intentionally thin as in just mixed but not thinned with anything. My only goal is to get the thin stuff to line the bottom of the pores. Once the bottom of the pores have filler in them subsequent coats will stick much better since ep*xy seems to like to stick to itself.

My second coat was thickened with silica to the consistency of cold cream and then slathered on, pressed into the pores and either sanded back to wood or I would leave a thin coat on the entire surface. Most of the time now I can get a complete fill in two sessions messing with the viscosity AND understanding that initially getting the stuff to stick in the pore bottoms is not all that easy and seems to work better with thin viscosity filler.

I've never witnessed ep*xy pore filling shrinking over time and I have some example here that are 8 years old now and smooth as glass.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:42 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:42 pm
Posts: 1714
First name: John
Last Name: Parchem
City: Seattle
State: Wa
Zip/Postal Code: 98177
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
B. Howard wrote:
I use prestec polyester. 3 coats 20 minutes apart then wait 24 hours and level sand and apply any finish you like.


Do you spray it?

_________________
http://www.Harvestmoonguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:11 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 am
Posts: 2593
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Danny
Last Name: Vincent
I use Z-Poxy. I am suspect of the bond between it and nitro. I think I'm going to try a shellac method next time.

Sorry Steve. A little off topic.

Brian. Tell us more please!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 6:41 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:42 am
Posts: 1583
Location: United States
Start some more guitars to eliminate the boredom while waiting.

Brian, some more details on the polyester steps??? Also, can this be used to glue/fill around inlays? I am too allergic to use epoxy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:55 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 10:22 am
Posts: 727
First name: Brian
Last Name: McDonald
City: Okanagan Centre
State: British Columbia
Zip/Postal Code: V4V2H6
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
kencierp wrote:
Timbermate is my second choice to Zpoxy

I pretty much have dismissed the WB clear fillers -- many coats and when you have enough on dark woods you can start to see the silica.


Ken, I believe it was you previously reccomending Hood lacquer based grain filler. Going back a few years.
Did you end up having issues with this product? I used it a few times and other than the nitro stink it was fairly easy and effective.

B

_________________
My memory is so good, sometimes I remember things that never happened.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:09 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:03 am
Posts: 1737
Location: Litchfield MI
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I found that after two coats on dark wood the silica began to haze - turned out to be unexceptable for my needs.

_________________
Ken Cierp

http://www.kennethmichaelguitars.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:26 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:14 am
Posts: 195
First name: Nils
Last Name: Johnson
City: Boston
State: Massachusetts
What finish do you use over the epoxy? How long do you let it cure before you buff?
I spray nitro over epoxy and wait 1 month before buffing. So three days at the start is kinda irreverent, considering its gonna sit so long...3 days to get epoxy in the pores and not shrinking back is a bargain.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 9:12 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:06 pm
Posts: 2739
Location: Magnolia DE
First name: Brian
Last Name: Howard
City: Magnolia
State: Delaware
Zip/Postal Code: 19962
Country: United States
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
I used sytem 3 SB112 with fumed silica expander for several years and replaced that with this due to some of the same things in the OP.

The polyester I use is sprayed. It smells bad just like epoxy but is non flammable so it is a lot safer to spray then most finish products. It is very forgiving as to mix ratios unlike some epoxies but shelf life of the MEKP catalyst is kinda short. It can be tough on spray guns and there is quite a bit of cleaning to be done between coats. 3 wet coats will usually fill the pores in anything and it has 0 shrink back. It is far easier to level sand than epoxy.

I typically will spray it one day and then the next morning I will drop fill any gaps etc with fresh mixed product from a pipette. It will chemically self bond out to at least 24 hours without any problems. The next day it is ready to level sand and top coat (although my work schedule does not allow that, it usually sits for 3-4 days at my shop).

It is purple in color before being activated but once the MEKP is added and mixed it changes to a light caramel tint (very slight color). So this means that just as z-poxy you either leave it only in the pores when you level sand or you leave a thin coat everywhere. I opt for the thin coat everywhere as it has great sealing properties. I do recommend a barrier coat under it on oily tropical woods like coco and such. Simtec has a product for this but I just use a wash of thin CA which is both cheaper and quicker.

_________________
Brian

You never know what you are capable of until you actually try.

https://www.howardguitarsdelaware.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 10:30 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:12 pm
Posts: 6994
First name: Mike
Last Name: O'Melia
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Wash coat of CA? Wow. Do you put it on the top too? (The polyester)

Thanks for the info Brian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 9:25 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:06 pm
Posts: 2739
Location: Magnolia DE
First name: Brian
Last Name: Howard
City: Magnolia
State: Delaware
Zip/Postal Code: 19962
Country: United States
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
Mike O'Melia wrote:
Wash coat of CA? Wow. Do you put it on the top too? (The polyester)

Thanks for the info Brian


No, i do not use polyester on the tops of acoustic guitars.

I only use the CA on oily tropical woods like rosewoods. Mahogany etc just gets the polyester.

_________________
Brian

You never know what you are capable of until you actually try.

https://www.howardguitarsdelaware.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Faster pore fill?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:14 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 8:54 pm
Posts: 135
Location: Santa Rosa Beach, FL
First name: Chris
Last Name: Alvarado
City: Santa Rosa Beach
State: FL
Zip/Postal Code: 32439
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I found a good deal on a UV cure system about a year ago and tried it on a guitar, but hated how it sprayed and looked once I went through the process. With that said, I've been using the UV cure pore filler portion of the system on all of my guitars and it's amazing! I spray Nitro over it to finish the instrument, but the entire pore fill process takes a total of 1.5 hours!

http://www.cureuv.com/uv-cure-wipe-on-g ... quart.html

I spray a wash coat of shellac on the bare wood to start out. Then apply the clear gel poor fill. This is done exactly like one would do with Zpoxy. (Very thin) I cure it with the UV light for about 60 seconds then do a light level sand with 320 grit, and. Repeat the process two more times. After the third poor fill and cure, I then scuff with 220 and begin my nitro application.

I thought the UV system was a total loss after I used the topcoat on a test guitar and hated it, but now that I'm using it for the poor fill step, I love it and will continue to use it on all of my guitars. It dries crystal clear and rock hard, with zero shrink back. All the benefits of Zpoxy without the wait.

_________________
Chris Alvarado
www.ChrisAlvaradoLive.com
www.Driftwood-Guitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com