Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Jul 24, 2025 6:23 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:20 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 3:27 pm
Posts: 213
First name: Alex
Last Name: Takacs
State: Illinois
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I have some quartered black walnut with some beautiful purple/maroon streaking in the grain that I might like you use on a bridge. Anybody ever try using walnut as a bridge material? What do you guys think? -Alex


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 1:41 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:10 pm
Posts: 2485
Location: Argyle New York
First name: Mike/Mikey/Michael/hey you!
Last Name: Collins
City: Argyle
State: New York
Zip/Postal Code: 12809
Country: U.S.A. /America-yea!!
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Ovation used Walnut for years.
It's lite& strong.

Use it!
I would.
Mike

_________________
Mike Collins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:01 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:01 pm
Posts: 1887
Location: UK
Mike Collins wrote:
Ovation used Walnut for years.
It's lite& strong.

Use it!
I would.
Mike



Ovation :o That's not exactly a great endorsement. . . but Walnut should be fine. I've used it but only on Nylon strung.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 6:37 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:56 am
Posts: 855
Location: United States
Trevor Gore recommends walnut for bridges in his books along with Australian Blackwood, Padauk. Perhaps he will chime in here.

Max

_________________
Max Bishop
Brighton, Michigan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 7:11 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I use black walnut frequently on both classical and steel string guitars. Both have at least one layer of CF in and I've never had a failure. It seems Ovation don't bother with the CF and it obviously worked for them. It's a great wood if you want a low mass bridge.

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 8:44 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:47 pm
Posts: 153
First name: john
Last Name: smith
City: hemet
State: ca
Zip/Postal Code: 92543
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
As I recall it is high damping though. I like for a bridge to be as musical as it can be and still be light. Paduk would work and of course Brazilian. As cheap as bridges are and as important as they are I wouldnt use something just because it was laying around.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 12:23 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Filippo Morelli wrote:
Trevor, would I be correct in assuming the walnut you use has a pretty low "Q"? This would seem to go against convention for a bridge, but knowing you I'm sure there's a good reason for your choice. Can you share some thoughts about why you like walnut for classical and steel bridges?

I use it because I can make really low mass bridges out of it and still have them strong enough, stiff enough and hard enough to do all the other things bridges have to do (support saddles, form part of the bracing structure, not get sliced up by strings, etc.).

The stuff I've been using is pretty low damping (an ear test), lower, I'd say, than the Aus blackwood bridges I've used, which have been on some of the brightest instruments I've made. So damping, as such, seems to be low on the list of priorities for a bridge, compared with the other properties I've mentioned above. If you want high frequency response, go light and you get it. It's very hard to do comparative listening tests with bridge materials without swapping bridges on the same guitar, which I've never bothered doing, because you'd have to make them of the same mass and stiffness as well. Now saddle materials, easy to test and they make an audible difference.

I looked up the log dec (another measure of damping) of black walnut as reported by Haines, J. Guitar Acoustics, #2, March 1981. He has it at 0.017, compared to BRW also at 0.017, one sample of each. Damping varies, of course, like all other wood properties.

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 2:03 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 1:59 am
Posts: 678
First name: Eric
Last Name: Reid
City: Ben Lomond
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 95005
Country: USA
Status: Professional
I have a large inventory of Claro Walnut (Juglans hindsii). Beautiful wood, and as Fillippo mentions, it taps like cardboard. Maybe that's not fair to the cardboard. I haven't built any guitars with it. There's no way that the wood I have has a Q comparable to Brazilian Rosewood.

On the other hand, I heard a talk 35 years ago by an amateur violin builder who raved about Eastern Black Walnut (Juglans nigra). He was obsessed with tap tone. His favorites were Koa, and Eastern Black Walnut. Koa is certainly resonant--similar to Aussie Blackwood (which grows here too, and I have a fair stash). I don't have much experience with Eastern Black Walnut. Still, his reference point was Maple, not Brazilian Rosewood.

I think Torres made a point of using Brazilian Rosewood for the bridge, even when he economized elsewhere. Maybe Torres was superstitious. Maybe he had laid in a lifetime supply of bridge blanks early on, and was using what he had. I guess I'm superstitious too. Given the reputation of Torres' guitars, I'd rather monkey with the bridge in other ways before I choose a low Q wood.

My superstitions were reinforced when I worked for a small manufacturer of classical guitars. All of their models used Brazilian Rosewood for the bridge. At one point, there was a glitch in the supply chain, and a further glitch in quality control, and three of the high end models ended up with Pau Ferro bridges. Nobody knew. The sales staff didn't know the difference. But those three guitars hung on the wall, and were passed over by customer after customer until
the problem was Identified.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 2:16 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3933
Location: United States
I, too, like walnut as a bridge wood. As Trevor says, you can make the bridge light and still have good stiffness, and that gives good high frequency response. I like to set the saddle back a little further from the front edge of the bridge than many people do, and that goes especially for walnut bridges. Instead of making the front of the slot 3mm back I make it 5. Also, using a back angle on the saddle really helps to reduce the splitting force on the top of the slot. Finally, with the lower density as compared with rosewood, you can make the footprint of the bridge a bit bigger, which really helps in keeping it glued down, especially on cedar and redwood tops. A can't think of any of my walnut bridges that have broken, split, or come unglued, but my memory isn't perfect, either, and I've been using the stuff for forty years.

A lot of the morado I've seen has been about as dense as African ebony. I only made one Classical with a black ebony bridge, and replaced it soon afterward.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 6:17 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:08 pm
Posts: 1958
Location: Missouri
First name: Patrick
Last Name: Hanna
State: Missouri
Country: USA
I made a replacement bridge from black walnut about 40 years ago--in total ignorance, because I had it on hand, it was pretty, and it seemed like it would work. In fact, it DID work, and it's still working today. Of course, I didn't have access to discussion forums or other literature at the time. I just used it and was happy with it. I don't have the deep experience with materials that a lot of our members have, so I would say read Alan's post carefully. Then, use your walnut and see if it works to your satisfaction. It'll work fine, but see if it works to YOUR satisfaction. If not, it's a fairly simple matter to replace with something else.
Patrick


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 7:23 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:47 pm
Posts: 153
First name: john
Last Name: smith
City: hemet
State: ca
Zip/Postal Code: 92543
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I can hear the difference between ebony, Indian rosewood and braziian bridges I have with the decreasing thud and increasing ring you would expect but I dont have a walnut one to compare.
I have been reading this forum many years and the impression I have had is that eastern black produces a guitar that sounds a lot like mahogany. Not trying to introduce a new topic but that suggests that damping is present similar to mahogany. Someone want to send a walnut bridge to me?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com