Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Tue Jul 29, 2025 11:58 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:55 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:47 pm
Posts: 1624
Location: United States
First name: Larry
Last Name: Hawes
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I was just watching a video posted by Robbie Obrien re: an 1890 Martin 'O' sized guitar and he said (at 1:55 into the video) the back was about 1.9mm, sides 1.5mm, top under 2mm in some areas and that guitar sounds great (to my ears). Does anyone build that thin anymore?

Is it a bit suicidal for future repair work? I'm building an 'O' sized guitar with much thicker plates (approx. .085 back, .080 sides, .110 top) but am now wondering about the plate thicknesses and would love to experiment with very thin but really don't want to build a temporary guitar - though that little rascal lasted pretty well.

After reading a bunch of posts here over the years I've never read of anyone going that thin. Again just wondering, does anyone build that thin?

viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=40213&p=528105#p528105

EDIT: I realize that was originally built for gut strings but he strung with, I think, silk and steel strings for the video. Still curious.

_________________
Thank You and Best To All


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:01 pm 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:02 am
Posts: 92
City: Alton
State: IL
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Something with a more ridged rim should allow you to go a bit thinner on the sides. Maybe double sides?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:12 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:28 pm
Posts: 383
First name: William
Last Name: Snyder
City: Brooklyn
State: NY
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Also, that guitar wasn't built for steel strings if it was from 1890.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:38 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:47 pm
Posts: 1624
Location: United States
First name: Larry
Last Name: Hawes
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
WilliamS wrote:
Also, that guitar wasn't built for steel strings if it was from 1890.


Noted above, but is now strung with silk and steel, and I assume the bracing was not only repaired but beefed up a little?

_________________
Thank You and Best To All


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:39 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:47 pm
Posts: 1624
Location: United States
First name: Larry
Last Name: Hawes
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Filippo Morelli wrote:
LarryH wrote:
I was just watching a video posted by Robbie Obrien re: an 1890 Martin 'O' sized guitar and he said (at 1:55 into the video) the back was about 1.9mm, sides 1.5mm, top under 2mm in some areas and that guitar sounds great (to my ears). Does anyone build that thin anymore?

Sure.

And you have to remember that the single 0 lower bout is smaller than more conventional guitars. And if using a stiff Adi spruce top, that's even more consideration to that thinness, especially along the perimeter of the top. I built a single 0 in red spruce not long ago. Top was stiff and I built very lightly.

Filippo


Thank Filippo,

Lightly of course - but THAT lightly? Just curious.

_________________
Thank You and Best To All


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:40 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:47 pm
Posts: 1624
Location: United States
First name: Larry
Last Name: Hawes
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Evilfrog wrote:
Something with a more ridged rim should allow you to go a bit thinner on the sides. Maybe double sides?


Didn't think of that. I always build with solid linings, didn't imagine that that would allow for thinner sides.

_________________
Thank You and Best To All


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:41 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:47 pm
Posts: 1624
Location: United States
First name: Larry
Last Name: Hawes
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Filippo Morelli wrote:
It's not that light...

Filippo


Thanks so much for the reply. I'll consider some lighter builds in the future.

_________________
Thank You and Best To All


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:25 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 am
Posts: 2593
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Danny
Last Name: Vincent
Could be a new call out for a builders challenge! "How Thin (or light) Can You Go". It would be fun for the builders that don't have imploding guitars. :lol: Maybe not so much for the other guys.

Danny


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:04 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:44 am
Posts: 2186
Location: Newark, DE
First name: Jim
Last Name: Kirby
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
DannyV wrote:
Could be a new call out for a builders challenge! "How Thin (or light) Can You Go". It would be fun for the builders that don't have imploding guitars. :lol: Maybe not so much for the other guys.

Danny


We'd have to set a minimum survival time before the action deviated from nominal by more than a certain amount, or something like that.

I always liked Gordon Bok's playing on 12 string, and, from what I understand, his favored luthier sort of built them under protest - they only lasted a few years. Probably a large part of why they sounded the way they did.

_________________
Jim Kirby
kirby@udel.edu


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 2:52 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:35 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: United States
First name: Joe
Last Name: Beaver
City: Lake Forest
State: California
Focus: Build
I'm more of an Imperial kind of guy but shouldn't that be 1.9 cm for the sides? Not mm? I am so confused.

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 4:04 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:23 am
Posts: 262
First name: nick
Last Name: dingle
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
1.9cm = 3/4" (more or less)

I think 1.9mm was correct...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 4:11 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
...don't say it...don't say it...DON'T say it...turn around and count to 10...OK, 12 for you guys...

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 4:15 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
OK. I've calmed down.

Anyone heard any good beaver jokes recently?

Edit: Alright, goat jokes will do.

Fortunately, Nick got in with a sensible answer whilst I was fighting for control...

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 5:23 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5968
Trevor,
I thought you guys liked your sides a little thicker down under? laughing6-hehe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 5:46 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Yep. Thick as two short planks, as my old man used to say...

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 8:26 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:35 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: United States
First name: Joe
Last Name: Beaver
City: Lake Forest
State: California
Focus: Build
I’m glad I am able to bring a small amount of happiness to our friends down under. It must be hard…. Another lonely night down at the billabong, fresh out of Fosters and not a ewe in sight…..

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:42 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Thanks for making us laugh, Joe!

We keep the Fosters for visitors, the good stuff we keep for ourselves.

Got any good ewe jokes? (Careful, now..., no pictures...)

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Thu May 02, 2013 1:28 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:35 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: United States
First name: Joe
Last Name: Beaver
City: Lake Forest
State: California
Focus: Build
Trevor Gore wrote:
We keep the Fosters for visitors...)

Well it's settled then. Next time I'm down your way I'll stop by for one of those 'visitor Fosters'

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Thu May 02, 2013 6:09 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Once you've travelled this far, you might need the good stuff. I usually have some standing by.

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Very Thin and Light?
PostPosted: Thu May 02, 2013 10:22 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:35 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: United States
First name: Joe
Last Name: Beaver
City: Lake Forest
State: California
Focus: Build
It would be some fun. Wish I could

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com