Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sat Aug 02, 2025 12:50 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:02 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 502
First name: joseph
Last Name: sallis
City: newcastle-upon-tyne
State: tyne and wear
Zip/Postal Code: ne46xe
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I think I have carved the x-braces too low in the region around the bridge patch.
Is it advisable to glue another piece on top to increase height?

_________________
We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at guitars.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:09 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:01 pm
Posts: 3031
First name: Tony
Last Name: C
City: Brooklyn
State: NY
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
How low have you carved them? I have gone below .25" at the trough of the scallop...just barely, but I have done it. It was a dread if that helps. You could add a brace behind the bridge plate that connects the two X legs. I did that on an OM I had concerns about. Check Mario Proulx's website for info:
http://www.proulxguitars.com/buildup/build6.htm

Looking at how deeply Mario scallops his braces...they are barely higher than the bridge plate. Granted, he adds carbon fiber to his braces, but thems be some deep scallops!

_________________
http://www.CostaGuitars.com
PMoMC


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:36 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5968
Hi Joe,
You might want to google Fred Carlson of drednautilius fame. He doesn't seem to worry about gluing up braces from multiple laminations of wood.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:18 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:21 am
Posts: 4915
Location: Central PA
First name: john
Last Name: hall
City: Hegins
State: pa
Zip/Postal Code: 17938
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Since the top isn't on the guitar
take pictures and post . It sounds like you may have gotten overzealous on the scalloping. I won't scallop much in that area . In a nut shell you can pop the braces off and redo. It is easier now than after the guitar is done. .

_________________
John Hall
blues creek guitars
Authorized CF Martin Repair
Co President of ASIA
You Don't know what you don't know until you know it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:51 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:46 am
Posts: 2227
Location: Canada
John beat me to it. If it's really bad, it's always easy to carve off, clean, and start again.

_________________
I'd like to be able to prove, just for once, that money wouldn't make me happy...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:33 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 1:11 pm
Posts: 2390
Location: Spokane, Washington
First name: Pat
Last Name: Foster
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Tony_in_NYC wrote:
How low have you carved them? I have gone below .25" at the trough of the scallop...just barely, but I have done it. It was a dread if that helps. You could add a brace behind the bridge plate that connects the two X legs. I did that on an OM I had concerns about. Check Mario Proulx's website for info:
http://www.proulxguitars.com/buildup/build6.htm

Looking at how deeply Mario scallops his braces...they are barely higher than the bridge plate. Granted, he adds carbon fiber to his braces, but thems be some deep scallops!


But we don't know how thick or how stiff his tops are.

I too would strip off the braces and begin again. Then you will end up with what you started out to do.

Pat

_________________
formerly known around here as burbank
_________________

http://www.patfosterguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:01 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 502
First name: joseph
Last Name: sallis
City: newcastle-upon-tyne
State: tyne and wear
Zip/Postal Code: ne46xe
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks for the replies.
I carved the brace down to about 5mm in an over-enthusiastic scoop. I thought it would have to come off but before that I thought I'd try a radical solution. So I glued on a bridge between the x-brace intersection and the peak. It certainly stiffened her up again. I want to make it clear that I don't really intend to leave it like this. I'll probably remove the braces and but in other ones. This is only my second guitar (my first was a disaster) so I want to follow the plans fairly closely.
But Im hoping to open this to discussion. What if I left it like this? Would it work?

Attachment:
brace.jpg


sorry for poor photo.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at guitars.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:05 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 502
First name: joseph
Last Name: sallis
City: newcastle-upon-tyne
State: tyne and wear
Zip/Postal Code: ne46xe
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
slightly better photo

Attachment:
brace2.jpg


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at guitars.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:38 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:01 pm
Posts: 3031
First name: Tony
Last Name: C
City: Brooklyn
State: NY
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
How thick is the top?


Posted using something.

_________________
http://www.CostaGuitars.com
PMoMC


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:48 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 502
First name: joseph
Last Name: sallis
City: newcastle-upon-tyne
State: tyne and wear
Zip/Postal Code: ne46xe
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
The top is about 2.9mm (0.114173228 inches) thick. Although is not even thickness all over.

_________________
We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at guitars.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:16 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5968
5mm (3/16ths inch+) may be tall enough for a relatively stiff top. So depending on the size of the guitar you are building and the sound you are looking for, the braces may be fine as is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:47 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 502
First name: joseph
Last Name: sallis
City: newcastle-upon-tyne
State: tyne and wear
Zip/Postal Code: ne46xe
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Clay S. wrote:
5mm (3/16ths inch+) may be tall enough for a relatively stiff top. So depending on the size of the guitar you are building and the sound you are looking for, the braces may be fine as is.


I'm building an OM. When I flexed across the x-braces it felt really floppy. I cut out the notches so the top sat on the sides and appled pressure at the bridge- there was a lot of give. I don't really know what I'm doing but it felt like the top would collapse too much under the weight of the strings.
Anyway, now I've glued on the bridge across the x-brace It's either go with that or install new braces.
I'd still like to hear some comments on the bridge across the brace.

_________________
We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at guitars.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:02 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:01 pm
Posts: 3031
First name: Tony
Last Name: C
City: Brooklyn
State: NY
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
String it with light gauge strings. It will be fine. I built a dread with a top at .095" and the braces were similar to yours and its fine. Obviously, the stiffness of a particular piece of wood matters, but you should be fine.


Posted using something.

_________________
http://www.CostaGuitars.com
PMoMC


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:08 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:47 pm
Posts: 1624
Location: United States
First name: Larry
Last Name: Hawes
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I love your solution with the over brace, but I like different and creative. I also don't see any reason why an over brace like you've designed wouldn't stiffen the area in question (which it did according to your observations) and save some weight/mass at the guitar top in those areas. I'd go for it with the over brace just to see what you get, I can't see a downside, but as usual better to wait for those who would know more about such things.

_________________
Thank You and Best To All


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:06 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 502
First name: joseph
Last Name: sallis
City: newcastle-upon-tyne
State: tyne and wear
Zip/Postal Code: ne46xe
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
LarryH wrote:
I love your solution with the over brace, but I like different and creative. I also don't see any reason why an over brace like you've designed wouldn't stiffen the area in question (which it did according to your observations) and save some weight/mass at the guitar top in those areas. I'd go for it with the over brace just to see what you get, I can't see a downside, but as usual better to wait for those who would know more about such things.


Thanks, Larry. I'm tempted to leave it too.

LarryH wrote:
, but as usual better to wait for those who would know more about such things.


Yes, please!

Tony_in_NYC wrote:
String it with light gauge strings. It will be fine. I built a dread with a top at .095" and the braces were similar to yours and its fine. Obviously, the stiffness of a particular piece of wood matters, but you should be fine.


Posted using something.


Tony, I love your optimism!

_________________
We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at guitars.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:19 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:58 am
Posts: 1667
I think you'll be fine, as long as the top isn't overly weak. This one -will- belly, so keep that in mind when setting the neck; allow some room for cutting-down the saddle in the following years. In other words, over-set the neck a bit, maybe as much as 1/16" over the bridge, such that everything should resolve itself to the correct geometry in a few years(instead of starting-out correct, and needing correction(neck reset) in a few years).

Not sure of the little spanning braces, though, because of the way the bridge torques the top at that point, so if you leave them in place(I say why not!), check-in on them, visually, once in a while. If they begin to show signs of buckling, just reach-in with some side cutters and cut 'em out...

Oh, and if you had your heart set on running mediums, try them; if the top is very stiff(and with little experience, you really can't tell us right now if this is a really stiff one or not, right?), you'll be fine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:22 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 2260
Location: Seattle WA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Joe Sallis wrote:
So I glued on a bridge between the x-brace intersection and the peak.

I like it. "Bridge over troubled scallop" or "Bridge saves scallop from torque monster"

But really, I think I've gone this low and it was ok. But if I flexed it and it felt like it was piviting at one point rather than a gradual flex, I would be sceptical.

_________________
Pat


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:51 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 502
First name: joseph
Last Name: sallis
City: newcastle-upon-tyne
State: tyne and wear
Zip/Postal Code: ne46xe
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Really appreciate your reply, Grumpy, but:
grumpy wrote:
I think you'll be fine, as long as the top isn't overly weak. This one -will- belly, so keep that in mind when setting the neck; allow some room for cutting-down the saddle in the following years. In other words, over-set the neck a bit, maybe as much as 1/16" over the bridge, such that everything should resolve itself to the correct geometry in a few years(instead of starting-out correct, and needing correction(neck reset) in a few years).

I need to understand this. If the bridge bellies doesn't that mean the saddle will go down? And if so, if the neck was set higher, wouldn't that give a bigger action?

grumpy wrote:
Not sure of the little spanning braces, though, because of the way the bridge torques the top at that point, so if you leave them in place(I say why not!), check-in on them, visually, once in a while. If they begin to show signs of buckling, just reach-in with some side cutters and cut 'em out...

Good idea!

grumpy wrote:

Oh, and if you had your heart set on running mediums, try them; if the top is very stiff(and with little experience, you really can't tell us right now if this is a really stiff one or not, right?), you'll be fine.

Not sure what you mean by running mediums...

pat macaluso wrote:
Joe Sallis wrote:
So I glued on a bridge between the x-brace intersection and the peak.

I like it. "Bridge over troubled scallop" or "Bridge saves scallop from torque monster"

But really, I think I've gone this low and it was ok. But if I flexed it and it felt like it was piviting at one point rather than a gradual flex, I would be sceptical.


Thanks, Pat. It felt like the top was pivoting. The bridge has stopped this. In fact it feels good (I think).
This is the problem with learning without a teacher and something even this forum can't solve. Things like, how stiff is a top are impossible to judge without comparison and someone telling you "this feels a good stiffness". The same is true with voicing the top- despite reading about it, I haven't a clue what I'm doing. I need someone to show me. I guess some of these things are covered in Trevor's book with formula but I ain't got that book yet...

_________________
We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at guitars.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:34 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:58 am
Posts: 1667
If the bridge bellies doesn't that mean the saddle will go down?

Nope, with a true belly, the top rises...

Not sure what you mean by running mediums...

Medium gauge(.013" to .056") strings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: is there a solution?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:09 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:01 pm
Posts: 3031
First name: Tony
Last Name: C
City: Brooklyn
State: NY
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Joe Sallis wrote:

Tony_in_NYC wrote:
String it with light gauge strings. It will be fine. I built a dread with a top at .095" and the braces were similar to yours and its fine. Obviously, the stiffness of a particular piece of wood matters, but you should be fine.


Tony, I love your optimism!


I'm a really positive guy. Plus, unless you had a really floppy sound board to begin with, I am certain you will be just fine. Especially with your "Bridge over troubled scallop" solution.

When Grumpy says to over set the neck, he is talking about tipping it back more than you would normally. Without string tension and without the top being pulled up, over setting the neck will result in a straight edge placed on the neck and extended over the bridge, being higher over the bridge than you would normally want it. However, when you string up the guitar, the tension will pull the bridge up and give you the action you want. Leaving the saddle high lets you adjust the action as the top rises a bit more over time. If you do not over set the neck, you will end up with very high action. I had to make the same compensation on a the dread I mentioned in the quote above. With only the two E strings on while I was doing the set up, they buzzed all the way up the neck. Once I had all of the strings on, the action was perfect. Time will tell if I over set the neck enough, but a year later and it is still fine.

_________________
http://www.CostaGuitars.com
PMoMC


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DanSavage, GregHolmberg and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com