Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Aug 07, 2025 1:29 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:52 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
I’m working on the top for build #2 and am hoping for some feedback on the bracing before I glue it to the rim. It will be a 14-fret Martin style sapele / Sitka 000 that will be used mostly for flatpicking and strumming with light strings. It’s the first top I have done from scratch, and is not based on any particular plan, so I am very interested in any suggestions the experienced folks here can offer.

The top is a relatively stiff piece of Sitka and is about 0.12” at the bridge plate, graduating to about 0.11” on the bass side of the lower bout and 0.115” on the treble side. The braces are red spruce. The x braces are 1/4” wide and 9/16” tall at the intersection, not counting the cap. The face and finger braces are also 1/4” wide. The bridge plate is Guatemalan rosewood and about 0.15” thick.

I took the lower leg of the x brace on the bass side down just a hair lower than the treble side.

Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks!


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Last edited by CharlieT on Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:55 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
PS - the top is cut out with a 1/4" - 1/2" margin around the perimeter, which may not be apparent in the photos.

PPS - the x angle is 98 degrees.

I just weighed the top and it comes in at 287 grams, which should drop by a few when the margin is removed.


Last edited by CharlieT on Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:59 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 7:56 am
Posts: 1825
Location: Grover NC
First name: Woodrow
Last Name: Brackett
City: Grover
State: NC
Zip/Postal Code: 28073
Country: USA
Focus: Build
I won't predict how a guitar will sound, or hold up from looking at pictures, but.....nice clean work.

_________________
I didn't mean to say it, but I meant what I said.
http://www.brackettinstruments.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:01 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 2:07 am
Posts: 815
Location: Olympia
First name: Mark
Last Name: Tripp
City: Olympia
State: Washington
Zip/Postal Code: 98506
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Looks good Charlie! Nice clean work! [clap]

I'll assume you meant .12, to .11, rather than .012, to .011!

I think with the thickness of your top, and the dimensions of your braces, you should have a fine sounding guitar! Did you voice by tapping?

Nice job. Way nicer than my first one from scratch!

-Mark

_________________
Pullman, WA

The more I know, the more I know I don't know.

trippguitars.com
OR
Find me on Facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:12 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
Thanks guys!

Mark - you are correct about the thickness measurments - I just corrected them. :mrgreen: Oh, and I did voice by tapping, although I don't think I accomplished much with it aside from etching a reference point in memory for future builds. When tapping I held the top about 1.5" in from the edge between the end of the bass side x brace and the upper tone bar and tapped at the bridge location. I also held it by sticking my thumb through the soundhole and letting the upper edge of the soundhole rest on the pad of my thumb. I get a slightly better ring with the latter, but in both cases I get a nice resonant "ring" with about 2 seconds of sustain. Does that all sound reasonable? By the way, I love your label! Very clever and unique. [:Y:]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:55 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Charlie: Nice clean work and I would bet it's going to sound excellant. Wonder if you are going to use a popcicle brace and if no why not??
Tom

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 4:16 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:47 am
Posts: 781
Location: Wauwatosa, WI, USA
My finger braces tend to look a bit shorter and taper further from the sides, but that could just be the differences in wood. The outer scallops look pretty close to the sides, but nothing too out of the ordinary. Looks really good. [:Y:]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:59 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
Tom West wrote:
Charlie: Nice clean work and I would bet it's going to sound excellant. Wonder if you are going to use a popcicle brace and if no why not??


Thanks Tom. I was not planning to use a popsicle brace, but don't have a strong feeling one way or the other. My bracing layout is based loosely on that of a 1938 Martin 000-18, which did not have one. I could still add one, though, if you talk me into it. 8-)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:01 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 2:07 am
Posts: 815
Location: Olympia
First name: Mark
Last Name: Tripp
City: Olympia
State: Washington
Zip/Postal Code: 98506
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Charlie,

That's what the first several help with. Points of reference. Take advantage of it, and make notes of measurements and observations - they will serve you well in future builds. Something I never did for the first few, and sorely wish I had.

Thanks for noticing the label. I worked with Dwight Knowlton at 73ideas - great guy to work with. It was like he crawled inside my mind, and pulled out what I saw there.

-Mark

_________________
Pullman, WA

The more I know, the more I know I don't know.

trippguitars.com
OR
Find me on Facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:07 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
Zach Ehley wrote:
My finger braces tend to look a bit shorter and taper further from the sides, but that could just be the differences in wood. The outer scallops look pretty close to the sides, but nothing too out of the ordinary. Looks really good. [:Y:]


Zach - the finger braces are an area where I was a little conservative. I wanted to get some feedback on them, and knew it would be easier to removed more wood than add it back. duh Since the guitar will be used primarily for flatpicking and strumming rather than fingerstyle, I didn't want to overdo it. Do you think I should shave them back a bit further from the sides?

Thanks for the input!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:09 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:34 pm
Posts: 1073
First name: Rob
Last Name: McDougall
City: Cochrane
State: Alberta
Looks Great!
With the thickness you have ended up with and the scallop carve you have used I think you will be very happy with the results.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:11 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
Robbie_McD wrote:
Looks Great!
With the thickness you have ended up with and the scallop carve you have used I think you will be very happy with the results.


Thank you, Robbie. That's encouraging to hear! bliss


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:54 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Charlie: Varying opinions as to it's need or not. Personally I like to use them but a shorter version then usual. The force of the strings puts a lot of force on the heel end of the neck trying to force it towards the sound hole.If you don't use a popcicle brace all that keeps the neck from trying to collapse into the hole is the glue area on the UTB and the sheer strenght of the spruce in the top along side the fingerboard. If the top should crack along the fingerboard all you have left is the UTB. This happened to me on one of my earlier guitars that did not have popcicle brace and the neck moved into the hole about 1/8 inch. Messed up the rosette etc. and ended up a less then pretty sight.That top was cedar which I think helped in the failure.Spruce may have held and of course there are lots of guitars out there without the brace that have faired well. Since then I've always used a popcicle brace and advocate for them especially to folks who want to remove them from existing guitars. This is just my experience and feeling,lots of folks feel otherwise. Show us some pictures of the finished product. Good luck.
Tom

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:57 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
Tom – thanks for sharing that. As you mentioned, the popsicle brace is a bit controversial and I have no experience on which to base an opinion. I would certainly like to avoid your experience if I can though, so I think I may add a shorter one, as you do. How short do you make yours, if I may ask?

Thanks again for taking the time to share your thoughts. Much appreciated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:52 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 3445
Location: Alexandria MN
I think you are just fine with that setup. I don't see any major red flags.

_________________
It's not what you don't know that hurts you, it's what you do know that's wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:20 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:35 pm
Posts: 2561
Country: USA
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
Here's my current take on OM or OOO sized instruments, in this case a 12 fret model.
I'm not suggesting that you change anything, just offering my take on this, as I think you have done a great job!
I use one finger brace only, and one lower face brace, on the smaller body guitars. Dreadnaught and larger get 2 fingers and 2 LFB's, although the additionl braces are smaller. I include the flat graft under the fretboard, as I believe the neck region needs the reinforcement, especially in the 12 fret models. I also use a 2 inch long neck block, slightly longer than most factory neck blocks.
My x braces are 5/8th's tall in the middle, grading down to 3/16th in the upper legs and 1/8th in the lower legs, carved into a parabola shape, and tucked into the kerfing.
The fingers are 1/4 inch tall, feathered down to nothing at the ends, carved triangularly.
The lower face's highest point is 1/2 inch, in the center of the guitar, feathering down to nothing at the ends, carved triangularly.
I also tuck the upper face brace into the kerfings, and the soundhole braces are tight against both the x braces and the UFB.
Most of you will probably recognize the influence of William Cumpiano, whom I consider to be one of the greats.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Old growth, shmold growth!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:42 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Charlie: I make sure the popcicle goes past both ends of the sound hole. Four inch sound hole and I make the brace about 6" long. That gives a inch on either side of the sound hole.Take care.
Tom

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:11 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
Terence Kennedy wrote:
I think you are just fine with that setup. I don't see any major red flags.


Thanks Terence! 8-)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
theguitarwhisperer wrote:
Here's my current take on OM or OOO sized instruments, in this case a 12 fret model.
I'm not suggesting that you change anything, just offering my take on this, as I think you have done a great job!
I use one finger brace only, and one lower face brace, on the smaller body guitars. Dreadnaught and larger get 2 fingers and 2 LFB's, although the additionl braces are smaller. I include the flat graft under the fretboard, as I believe the neck region needs the reinforcement, especially in the 12 fret models. I also use a 2 inch long neck block, slightly longer than most factory neck blocks.
My x braces are 5/8th's tall in the middle, grading down to 3/16th in the upper legs and 1/8th in the lower legs, carved into a parabola shape, and tucked into the kerfing.
The fingers are 1/4 inch tall, feathered down to nothing at the ends, carved triangularly.
The lower face's highest point is 1/2 inch, in the center of the guitar, feathering down to nothing at the ends, carved triangularly.
I also tuck the upper face brace into the kerfings, and the soundhole braces are tight against both the x braces and the UFB.
Most of you will probably recognize the influence of William Cumpiano, whom I consider to be one of the greats.


TGW - Thank you for sharing the photo and your thoughts. That's a nice, clean top! Are your x braces 1/4"? I'm also curious about the single finger brace...what is the advantage over two on each side? Does it impact the treble / bass balance, or just lighten up the guitar a bit?

Thanks again.

Charlie


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:20 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
Tom West wrote:
Charlie: I make sure the popcicle goes past both ends of the sound hole. Four inch sound hole and I make the brace about 6" long. That gives a inch on either side of the sound hole.Take care.
Tom


Thanks Tom! [:Y:]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:04 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:59 pm
Posts: 2103
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Country: Romania
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
SS truss holes are always giving me a scare (and yours looks bigger than usual) knowing that a solid UTB helps against caving in. How about capping with a 2" length of rosewood or carbon fiber? Take my 2 cents with lots of salt, just thinking outside the classical box :)

_________________
Build log


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:46 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
Alexandru Marian wrote:
SS truss holes are always giving me a scare (and yours looks bigger than usual) knowing that a solid UTB helps against caving in. How about capping with a 2" length of rosewood or carbon fiber? Take my 2 cents with lots of salt, just thinking outside the classical box :)


Interesting idea, Alexandru. I may do that. Thanks for the suggestion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:51 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:35 pm
Posts: 2561
Country: USA
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
I simply think the second finger brace is simply unnecesary is all. The edge of the guitar and the x-brace make a triangular shaped section of soundboard, which is smaller than on a dreadnaught, and is therefore stiffer, so subtracting a finger leaves that region lighter, and more responsive.
The single lower face brace leaves the region behind the bridge a little more flexible and more responsive to pumping low frequencies out the soundhole via point-source emanations.
The x braces are 5/16ths wide and 5/8ths tall, the same as my dreadnaughts.

_________________
Old growth, shmold growth!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com