Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sat Aug 16, 2025 1:10 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Corian vs. bone?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:47 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:57 pm
Posts: 775
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Daniel
Last Name: Minard
City: Powell River
State: BC
Country: Canada
Recently, a friend gave me some black & bone coloured Corian scraps. I used it for the nut & saddle on a recently completed parlour guitar & really like how easy it is to shape & polish.
The long pieces go through the thickness sander nicely & it's easy to start with an edge squared up on the jointer. Makes the job quite a bit faster than working with bone.
Those are the plusses. Are there any minuses I should consider? Any observations on how the tone may differ from bone?
Corian "feels" a little harder (the old tap it on your teeth test) but seems like it might wear more quickly.
TIA... Dan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Corian vs. bone?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:59 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:13 am
Posts: 1168
Location: United States
State: Texas
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
The black would be nice if you were working on a color coordination of one sort or another.

Corian works fine for nuts and saddles, but is isn't bone, and bone is valued higher on the value scale.

_________________
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100008907949110


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Corian vs. bone?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:06 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 9:02 am
Posts: 2351
Location: Canada
First name: Bob
Last Name: Garrish
City: Toronto
State: Ontario
Country: Canada
Status: Professional
I'd worry a lot more about a saddle in terms of tone since even open form chords only have a string or two that's actually ringing open.

As David says, bone is perceived as better whether there's a perceptible difference or not.

_________________
Bob Garrish
Former Canonized Purveyor of Fine CNC Luthier Services


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Corian vs. bone?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:49 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:40 pm
Posts: 505
First name: David
Last Name: Malicky
City: San Diego
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 92111
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I've found that the strings make noticeable dents in Corian. Not sure how important that is.

_________________
David Malicky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Corian vs. bone?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 3:08 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:52 pm
Posts: 299
Location: United States
First name: Bobby
Last Name: Masten
City: The Woodlands
State: TX
Zip/Postal Code: 77380
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I started replacing all my guitars corian or tusq nuts and saddles several years ago with bone. Personal preference for most people as to sound, but I find notes to have more sustain and be more defined than with corian. The first guitar I changed out my fellow band members were all saying "WOW! What kind of strings are those cause your guitar sounds fantastic!" I reinstalled the old string that had about 15 - 20 hours play on them just so I could measure the difference tonally to my ear. I like the sound of bone but not all do. Here's a link to a good discussion on both.

http://www.acousticguitarforum.com/foru ... one+corian

_________________
Bobby Masten


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Corian vs. bone?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 3:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:51 am
Posts: 3786
Location: Canada
Corian is softer IMO, and will leave string ruts at the saddle eventually .. I find that tonewise it is warmer, and not as defined as bone. I made an acoustic guitar for a local jazz player, and it originally had corian in it. He wanted me to take the finish off the back of the neck and oil it instead, which I did, and at the same time changed the saddle to bone, as I had jsut begun using it exclusively. He wondered what I had done to the soft tone he was getting before ... so for a while he used the corian, but eventually changed over to bone for hte saddle. He keeps both on hand in case he wants to change back.

_________________
Tony Karol
www.karol-guitars.com
"let my passion .. fulfill yours"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Corian vs. bone?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:56 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:57 pm
Posts: 775
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Daniel
Last Name: Minard
City: Powell River
State: BC
Country: Canada
Thanks Guys. I appreciate the input.
For now, I think I'll save the Corian for repairs where cost is a big issue.
Cheers. Dan


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: NikolayUsalf and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com