Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:21 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 4:57 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:04 am
Posts: 39
Location: SW FL Gulf Coast, USA
I don't wish to belabor a well-discussed subject, but the archived posts still leave me to wonder about ivory vs. bone vs. all others. I have a lot of materials that have been discussed as suitable, or more to the point, possible nut and saddle materials. I have a few bits of bone but I have pounds of mammoth ivory in white through deep butterscotch. All of it is dense and even-grained with only rare cracks, voids or layer separations and I would assume entirely suitable for nuts, saddles, tie-blocks, and so on. As I have plenty of the stuff and am quite used to working it for jewelry and objets d'art, is there a compelling reason to use bone instead, especially in the context of nylon vs. steel, as well.

Also, Dennis Leahy has advocated jade as a possible departure, and as I, too, am a faceter-lapidarist with a ready supply of muttonfat jade and other nephritic varieties, what drawbacks might there be to jade and other gemstones such as, say, chrysoprase? Mass would be a drawback, I'd think, but maybe I'm missing something.

I cast lead crystal and pate-de-verre, too. Any thoughts?

What else has been tried on classicals and what were the results? I also have corian, micarta, graphite, recon stone, MOP, coral, tagua, horn, antler and God only knows what else, but am especially interested in ivory vs. bone, and stone.

Caveats for any of these materials would be especially helpful. All speculations are welcome, too. It all sounds a bit mandarin, I'm sure, but I really am fascinated by the possibities.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:14 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:39 am
Posts: 1016
Location: United States
all I know about classicals is they seem to run more along traditional lines,as far as style and materials, with some straying a bit from that as of late. but the reality is you can do whatever you want to, however if your goal is to sell the instrument,too much variation from tradition might have youcaught up.. or maybe you will start a new tradition ! .. but if you want to get rid of some of your butterscotch mammoth ivory.... I will tell you how it works out on a steel string ! laughing6-hehe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:03 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:50 am
Posts: 942
Location: Ellicott City, Md - USA
First name: John
Last Name: A
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I will also be a tester of the butterscotch ivory - on a 4 different classicals - better send some extra so I can select just the right piece.

_________________
It's this new idea from recent decades that everyone gets a participation award. - MUX


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: rbuddy, stumblin and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com