Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Aug 01, 2025 11:35 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2010 6:21 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 10:48 pm
Posts: 344
Location: Tennessee
It's common knowledge that increasing brace height is the most effective way to increase stiffness per weight unit. It seems a lot of people have certain guidelines that a bridge plate should be a certain size( like cover the bridge footprint) so the top doesn't belly or roll forward. But are these low flat graphs really necessary other than to keep the strings from eating through the top? Why not increase the height of the bracing around the bridge or even add a thin tall brace behind the plate if more support is needed?

_________________
Jeremy Douglas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2010 7:26 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:56 am
Posts: 1271
Jeremy Douglas wrote:
But are these low flat graphs really necessary other than to keep the strings from eating through the top?


No. They do have a structural function but that can be met in other ways, as you suggest.

I will say that, in my experience, everything you do around the bridge has a big impact on tone and it's not necessarily a simple matter of using whatever provides the best stiffness/weight ratio.

If you have a beater or a test body, I'd suggest trying several configurations on that before committing to a radical change on a "real" guitar.

_________________
http://www.chassonguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2010 7:48 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:50 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Victoria, BC
First name: John
Last Name: Abercrombie
Status: Amateur
Jeremy Douglas wrote:
or even add a thin tall brace behind the plate if more support is needed?


That's been done- the so-called PMTE brace...(mass + support)
http://www.proulxguitars.com/buildup/build6.htm

I think another function of the bridge plate is to 'spread out' the forces a bit and prevent a 'stress riser' at the edges of the bridge?
Just a thought...

Cheers
John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 9:57 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 10:48 pm
Posts: 344
Location: Tennessee
Thanks guys, that confirms what I've been thinking.

_________________
Jeremy Douglas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 2:59 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:40 pm
Posts: 505
First name: David
Last Name: Malicky
City: San Diego
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 92111
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
The plate should also help lower the glue stress at the back edge of the bridge, especially if it extends a bit beyond the bridge. When something stiff (bridge) is bonded to something flexible (top), high stresses are found at the edges of the interface (in engineering terms, it's a stress concentration due to a stiffness discontinuity). For example, glue a rubber band to something stiff; pulling it causes it to peel away easily, starting at the edges. In guitars, braces are usually tapered to ~0 at their ends, and bridge plates give a little stepped 'taper' as well. Still, the glue stresses are pretty small compared to glue's typical capacity, so while the plate helps, it's probably not critical.

_________________
David Malicky


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dofthesea, Ken Lewis, rbuddy and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com