Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Wed Aug 06, 2025 1:55 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Thinnest guitar
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:34 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 8:35 am
Posts: 348
Location: Spartanburg SC
First name: Richard
Last Name: Sprouse
City: Spartanburg
State: SC
Zip/Postal Code: 29302
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
What's the minimum body depth you will use at the neck?
Richard


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thinnest guitar
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:33 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 7548
First name: Ed
Last Name: Bond
City: Nanaimo
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
3 1/4 at the neck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thinnest guitar
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:21 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:27 pm
Posts: 2109
Location: South Carolina
First name: John
Last Name: Cox
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I have a tenor right now that is coming out right about 2 1/4" at the neck....

Otherwise, 3 1/8" on the Oakie

Thanks

John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thinnest guitar
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:35 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:34 am
Posts: 3081
Thinnest acoustic guitar I've seen are photos of is a 1916 Maurer (Larson) with a box depth of 2-1/4" at it's thickest point. This was a "standard size" instrument which I would guess to be around 14". Larson instruments were heavily arched though.
Thinnest I would make a 15" would probably be around 3". but I use a pretty deep dish too...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thinnest guitar
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:43 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:40 pm
Posts: 763
Location: United States
I'm curious to hear reasoning behind people's numbers. Do you need a thick enough heel block to give better torque hold the neck back? Is it an acoustic decision, or just how the instrument feels? And, is it like a Manzer taper kind of deal? When you make the heel shallow, do you make the other end deeper to maintain an approximate volume? Or do you like to keep a certain ratio from one end to the other, and again why? Sound, feel, look?

Mike

_________________
Mike Lindstrom


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thinnest guitar
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:04 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:51 am
Posts: 1310
Location: Michigan,U.S.A.
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I think alot of varibles come into play when changeing the volume in the box by making it shallower at the neck.I do think it can have an effect on projection of sound.Shape and size changes have a large effect on that i have found in my builds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thinnest guitar
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:33 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:27 pm
Posts: 2109
Location: South Carolina
First name: John
Last Name: Cox
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Personally, I saw a whole lot of hype around the super-deep boxes... but when I built the Ditson GC (Martin Size 11, 13 1/2" across the lower bout) -- I basically went with the print on the 1st one. It worked pretty well -- plenty of bass and otherwise really nice balance, so I stuck with it.

I think Al has pointed out that there a whole bunch of relationships tangled up together with Box size, box depth, top and back compliance, soundhole, etc..... If you make a fairly lightly built top and back, the body resonance will be sufficiently low... even on a "Standard" depth box.

Thanks

John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thinnest guitar
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:24 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:59 pm
Posts: 3623
First name: Dennis
Last Name: Kincheloe
City: Kansas City
State: MO
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
My thinnest is a Cordoba FCWE (spruce/maple nylon 12 fret). Depth tapers 2.5" to 2.75", body length 19, bout widths 10.5, 9.25, 14.5, soundhole 3.5, scale length 25.5. It's a great example that size != volume. The thin box definitely affects the tone, it has a sharp "boing" sound to it, although you can get a more regular classical sound depending on where/how you pluck the strings. I love it. I would probably go with a deeper body if I was going to build a similar steel string though, to offset the naturally brighter twangy sound of steel. Maybe add .5" or so.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jfrench, ptourin, RaymundH and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com