Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Aug 01, 2025 10:43 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 4:22 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:40 pm
Posts: 505
First name: David
Last Name: Malicky
City: San Diego
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 92111
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I've read the posts on the different (and equally good) philosophies for back stiffness and tap tones (tune the back just above the main top frequency, or, way above). I'm wondering if one approach would be more favored if the back is a laminate (I usually use 1/8" Baltic birch). My instinct would be to make a laminate back pretty stiff, since it will have more damping and thus rob more power from the top. But then I see the lower end Taylors use no back bracing at all. Does anyone have experience with laminate backs, or any other insights?
Thanks, David

_________________
David Malicky


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:58 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:42 am
Posts: 1583
Location: United States
I believe for classical guitars, Smallman laminates up very heavy backs. Schramm also builds some of his guitars this way. Schramm might chime in here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:47 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:05 am
Posts: 9191
Location: United States
First name: Waddy
Last Name: Thomson
City: Charlotte
State: NC
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Indeed the "Smallman" Lattice style guitar does have a very heavy, laminated back. However, it's a "horse of a different color"! those guitars are not at all like a standard classical guitar. They also have a very heavy plywood frame inside to increase internal rigidity and structure, so the top is the only thing producing much in the way of sound. Not true of other guitars.

_________________
Waddy

Photobucket Build Album Library

Sound Clips of most of my guitars


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:38 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:40 pm
Posts: 505
First name: David
Last Name: Malicky
City: San Diego
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 92111
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks for the info! I think I'll stick to stiff for now, and maybe loosen it up after I understand the top better.

_________________
David Malicky


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:30 am 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:04 pm
Posts: 82
First name: David
Last Name: Schramm
State: CA
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
In my lattice guitars I try to build them as close as I can to the Smallman design from the research that I have done. The backs are 6.5mm thick. I think that is close to 9 plys. I weight about 240 lbs and can stand on them with out any damage. I tested an old discarded back that was only 5mm thick by standing and bouncing and still no damage. Ideally what you want is thick, stiff and heavy. Light and stiff is not good. It would still move too much and absorb string energy.

The plywood frame isn't as heavy as it looks. One of the cool features of the plywood frame is the ability to change the size of the soundboard after the guitar is complete.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com