Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Aug 01, 2025 10:51 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 4:07 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:40 pm
Posts: 505
First name: David
Last Name: Malicky
City: San Diego
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 92111
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I'm wondering what guidelines are useful in controlling the density of spruce used for bracing. I buy my brace stock from Aircraft Spruce, and have found densities ranging from 24-34 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). In other units, that's 6.3 - 9.0 g/cubic inch, or 0.39 - 0.55 g/cc. I understand "nominal" spruce density is 28-29 pcf. I've been sorting boards and only using ones between 27-30 pcf, to try to reduce the unknowns, but not sure if I need to be that conservative. I know I could also measure Young's Modulus but would rather not get into the additional work for all the sizes involved (this is for a woodshop class, building lots of simple guitars). Any thoughts? Does anyone know what Martin, Taylor, etc. do?
Thanks, David

_________________
David Malicky


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 4:35 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:21 am
Posts: 4915
Location: Central PA
First name: john
Last Name: hall
City: Hegins
State: pa
Zip/Postal Code: 17938
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Martin just uses it. They check for cracks and visual defects. Other than that it is just made into a guitar. I use a deflection scale for my bracing. I am not so worried about the density. I look more for the stiffness

_________________
John Hall
blues creek guitars
Authorized CF Martin Repair
Co President of ASIA
You Don't know what you don't know until you know it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:54 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I make sure there is as little runout as possible.Then do deflection testing with dial indicator and spaced center points using a steel weight.Don't know the weight and don't have a specific deflection. Have done enough braces before to know what I'm looking for in terms of range.I find that I'm not very accurate in separating braces just by hand bending and feel.I look for the stiffest braces based on the deflection and record these readings directly on the braces.When doing this it important to have all your braces to the same cross section.

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:38 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:27 pm
Posts: 2109
Location: South Carolina
First name: John
Last Name: Cox
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Remember that density and stiffness have an almost exactly a linear relationship in Spruce...

Your more dense pieces are also more stiff pieces per unit volume... so you can just shave them down a bit more.

I would carefully look over the very dense pieces -- check for very deep brown/red, heavy sap enriched areas that look kinda like Heart Pine (Full of dried sap).... These also smell like Pine Sol / Pine Power when split... and they burn like Napalm! Don't use these for bracing... They work great for lighting the BBQ grill or the fireplace, though...

Good luck

John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:48 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:40 pm
Posts: 505
First name: David
Last Name: Malicky
City: San Diego
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 92111
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks for the feedback! That's very helpful to know about Martin -- sounds like I'm on the conservative side, then. Didn't know about the sap-filled spruce... I'll lookout for that. I'm trying to keep dimensions standardized (beginning woodshop students), so I'll probably still sort by density to keep stiffness in the ballpark (yeah, that was my goal in tracking density). But based on Martin, it sounds like I can open up the range, maybe 25-32 pcf now. That'll save some $, too.

_________________
David Malicky


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: meddlingfool and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com