Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Mon Jul 28, 2025 3:34 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 12:04 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:21 am
Posts: 129
Location: Canada
Hi all.

I have a steel-string I'm doing the final setup on (it's been strung up and played for over a month) and I've been having a hard time finding info on what the general guidelines for relief are.

Cumpiano's and Natelson's book suggest .016" - .031", but that seems a little excessive to me, only because I've heard a few people 'round here throwing in numbers like .003" or .005".

So...

What do you do? I'd be interested to hear about you're preferences for steel string and classicals, flat pickin' and fingerstyling.

Thanks.

_________________
-Clint Beacock


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 12:14 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 622
Location: Santo, TX
Around .005" to .007" for me, usually. And I'm mostly a flatpicker.

_________________
Wes McMillian
Santo, TX
http://www.wesmcmillian.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 12:16 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:36 am
Posts: 7473
Location: Southeast US
City: Lenoir City
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37772
Country: US
Focus: Repair
I've recently set one up to .003 and so far I like it.

_________________
Steve Smith
"Music is what feelings sound like"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 2:16 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:02 am
Posts: 3272
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
First name: Barry
Last Name: Daniels
.007" is what I shoot for.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 2:46 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 2:47 am
Posts: 306
Location: Seattle
First name: Rick
Last Name: Davis
City: Seattle
State: WA
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
The best discussion of relief I've seen is at http://www.bryankimsey.com/setup/neck_relief_1.htm. Bryan did the math rather than going by intuition. Check it out!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 3:19 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:58 am
Posts: 2774
Location: Tampa, Florida USA
The least amount I can get. I'd have it straight if it wouldn't buzz. So it all depends on your playing style. The harder you play the more the strings vibrate and the chances of fret buzz are more likely to happen although it's related to how low your action is too. If you can leave the neck straight then do. I've also read that you can get a lower action and less relief with a compound radius.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 3:51 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:56 am
Posts: 1271
I usually end up between .006" and .010" at the 6th or 7th fret.

Rick, I like that the article distinguishes between action and relief (a lot of players don't get that) but if he is only measuring relief at the 7th fret, the rest of his numbers aren't necessarily very meaningful. The shape of the relief is all important in my book. I don't think in terms of just the number at the 7th fret.

I've seen a lot of Gibson's in for setup work recently where the 7th fret measurement was OK but almost all the curve took place in the first 3 frets. Doesn't work so well and would likely produce very different numbers than he has.

_________________
http://www.chassonguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 7:02 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 3:37 am
Posts: 2670
Location: United States
First name: John
Last Name: Mayes
City: Norman
State: OK
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I use .005

That is what the plek machines setup things for pretty standard as well.

Of course it depends on the player, guitar, and style, but .005 is a comfortable number to shoot for.

_________________
John Mayes
http://www.mayesluthier.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 8:47 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:35 am
Posts: 671
Location: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I'm with Kent on this. Somewhere in the .007-.009" range depending upon scale length and playing style. .005" is too flat, for my tastes at least because it doesn't allow the lattitude that no matter truss rod or graphite, necks and bodies move, and because it is a setup that is only useful for someone with a relatively weak right hand attack. I had a client send one of my guitars to Joe Glaser because they were looking for ridiculously low action. Joe said my fretwork was above the 95th percentile of everything he sees and that the client was being unreasonable. No acoustic guitar I've ever played could I have a relief of .005" without getting some back buzzing unless the player had a very gentle attack. Most of the builders I know are in the range I suggested above.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 9:06 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:21 am
Posts: 129
Location: Canada
Thanks for all the replies. Much appreciated.

I've set the guitar at around .008" - .010". That article's an interesting read, Rick. And Kent makes a good point about the shape of the relief being important. Lot's of good stuff for me to think about!

How about classicals? Do you tend to shoot for the same range? Or do you give it a little more to help with back buzz (unless you're a flamenco guy and want that sort of thing)?

Regards,

_________________
-Clint Beacock


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:10 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:59 pm
Posts: 2103
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Country: Romania
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Depends... myself I make it as flat as possible. The string tension will induce a bit of relief, and I also make the bass part of the saddle taller (about 2mm rise over the whole lenght)

I don't think back buzzes are wanted by any guitar player! They are a bit harder to control indeed with a flat FB, but a slightly taller nut fixes it.

_________________
Build log


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:41 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 3:37 am
Posts: 2670
Location: United States
First name: John
Last Name: Mayes
City: Norman
State: OK
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I always set my relief around .005 (give or take a thou or two), and I've never had a issue with back buzz except when I cut a nut slot too low. I've plek'ed hundreds of McPherson guitars that had .005 relief (and no adjustable truss rod...) and never had an issue with back buzzing. I play hard with my right hand, and don't have issues. I still use a plek a few times a week now (Norman music) and still routinely see that sort of relief work well.

Bottom line is there is much more going on than the relief. Don't let anyone tell you that such and such relief is the only way to go or you'll have issues. Just because one guy does it this way doesn't mean that's the only way to do it...as we all well know!

Use the numbers as a general guideline and find out what works for you and your guitars.

_________________
John Mayes
http://www.mayesluthier.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:18 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 622
Location: Santo, TX
I'm with John on this. As I said, I shoot for .005" to .007" (closer to .007") and I'm a pretty heavy handed bluegrasser. I used to buy in to the whole idea that more relief is necessary for bluegrass, but started slowly lowering my relief thanks to Bryan Kimsey and haven't gone back. Like John said, there's a lot more going on than just relief. Not arguing the fact, of course, that you can achieve an excellent playing guitar with more relief. Again, the key is a well set up guitar with more (or less) relief. A poorly set up guitar with less relief, of course, will have problems.

_________________
Wes McMillian
Santo, TX
http://www.wesmcmillian.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 10:33 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:58 am
Posts: 2774
Location: Tampa, Florida USA
I think that's where the beauty of using a neck jig might be helpful for setting up a guitar. You level the board as it would be under string tension. That helps getting out the humps that can happen by the torque on the head.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:32 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 622
Location: Santo, TX
Even better yet, the angle iron method shown to us by Rick Turner and others. No simulated string tension here, but the real deal. Eliminates any surprises.

_________________
Wes McMillian
Santo, TX
http://www.wesmcmillian.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:50 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:57 pm
Posts: 1982
Location: 8.33±0.35 kpc from Galactic center, 20 light-years above the equatorial in the Sol System
First name: duh
Last Name: Padma
City: Professional Sawdust Maker
Focus: Build
Relief eh? try Rolaids...works fast.

Regarding neck relief and how much, well you gotta bear in mind that
no two cabbages role down the hill the same way.


blessings
the
Padma

_________________
.

Audiences and dispensations on Thursdays ~ by appointment only.



.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:50 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 7:56 am
Posts: 1825
Location: Grover NC
First name: Woodrow
Last Name: Brackett
City: Grover
State: NC
Zip/Postal Code: 28073
Country: USA
Focus: Build
There's alot of good neck relief advice in this thread. I think .006" is a good number, but it's just a number. Assuming everything else is good if it buzzes only on the low frets it needs more relief. If it buzzes only on the higher frets it needs less relief.

_________________
I didn't mean to say it, but I meant what I said.
http://www.brackettinstruments.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:54 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:56 am
Posts: 1271
One more thing...ideally the treble side has less relief than the bass. I've been making my necks a bit asymmetrical to control that.

_________________
http://www.chassonguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:56 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:58 am
Posts: 2774
Location: Tampa, Florida USA
Wouldn't the high frets be a matter of fallaway??


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: oval soundhole and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com