Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Mon Aug 04, 2025 12:51 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:41 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:02 pm
Posts: 801
Location: United States
First name: Gene
Last Name: Zierdt
City: Sebastopol
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 95472
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I'm building my 7th guitar, and decided to put some more science into my building by using frequency content via fft using Strobosoft 2, and a PC tone generator to create the Chaladni patterns. The guitar is an OM made to Scott Antes plan layout, with lighter 1/4" x 5/8" spruce X-brace, a spruce top, and curly Narra back and sides. I can't call myself a guitar player right now, but I'm aiming this one at being a fingerstyle type guitar, with good tone clarity and even voice low to high.

Here's where I stand right now. The top's frequency response curve is shown in pic 1, and pic 2 show's the ring+ mode at 235hz. It doesn't close, but I didn't want to take it down any lower. I expect as I gain more experience (and finish watching Alan's DVD), I'll be able to do a better job of closing the ring at a bit higher frequency.

Pic 1- Top frequency response:

Image

Pic 2- Top Ring+ at 235 hz:

Image

Now I'm working on the back. The frequency response is shown in pic 3. I'm not sure which of the resonances around 300 is the Ring+. I think it's the one at 287hz. Pics 4 & 5 show the 287hz and 300hz resonances. Am I correct that the 287hz one is the ring+?

Second, if I want my back Ring+ mode about a semi-tone above the top Ring+ mode, since the top is at 235hz- A#, then should I tune the back to B, or 247hz, correct?

Pic 3- back frequency response:

Image


Pic 4: back @ 287 hz:

Image

Pic 5: back @ 300 hz:

Image

_________________
Gene

Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason- Mark Twain


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 7:24 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3933
Location: United States
The main reason I didn't venture to get into back tuning on the video is that it's so hard to say anything for sure. When I talk about getting the 'main back' resonant mode a semitone higher than the 'main top' mode, thats' on the ASSEMBLED guitar. After you've made a few of a particular shape and sizer with a given back bracing scheme, you get to where you can more or less tell when it's going to end up at the right frequency relative to the top when it's assembled, but any change can throw you off.

Other than that: you've got some decent looking modes there. I often find it difficult to close the ring+ mode on tops with asymmetric bracing, which is one reason I went over the the double X pattern.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alaska Splty Woods, guitarjtb, Ken Nagy and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com