Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Aug 08, 2025 3:32 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Scale Length vs Tension
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:48 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:12 pm
Posts: 6994
First name: Mike
Last Name: O'Melia
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Is it not true that as scale lenght increases, so does overall tension (loading on the bridge)?

I want to modify my harp guitar design to be a 14 fret. Original scale length is 25.5". But if I want to maintain bridge location and sound hole location, then I need a longer scale. My supplier suggested 28.63". Now that is long! But as I recall, that means I need more tension given a tuning. Plus, string buzz can increase due to the amplitude of the vibrations meaning I must maintain a higher action (not fond of that).

Help please!

Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:30 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:59 pm
Posts: 3624
First name: Dennis
Last Name: Kincheloe
City: Kansas City
State: MO
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Well, the 3 variables are tension, scale length, and string gauge. So if you use lighter strings, then they can be longer with less tension... but with that much added length, they might break before getting up to standard tuning. Baritones have scale lengths like that though, so you could do a baritone harp guitar :)

If I were you, I'd modify the body instead. Probably a full redesign, since I love the designing part. But for a more patch-style fix, you could move the bridge up a bit, shorten the upper bout, maybe add more frets to keep the soundhole from moving so much.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:56 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:12 pm
Posts: 6994
First name: Mike
Last Name: O'Melia
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Yes, I agree. I am going to look at subtle changes to allow the 25.5" scale. It will involve bracing mods. Maybe a slight sound hole shift.

There is more than enough tension on the bridge as it is.

Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 5:18 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:42 pm
Posts: 2360
Location: Windsor Ontario Canada
First name: Fred
Last Name: Tellier
City: Windsor
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: N8T2C6
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Why not just reshape the guitar part of the harp and the treble side of the harp neck to clear the 14th fret. A 000 12 fret Martin for example has a body that is 2 frets longer than a 14 fret 000, if you look at the outlines the 14 fret is the same shape except for the front of the body is moved back to give the clearance. The bracing is about the same on each so little body changes will be needed.

Fred

_________________
Fred Tellier
http://www.fetellierguitars.com
Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/pages/FE-Tellier-Guitars/163451547003866


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:49 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:12 pm
Posts: 6994
First name: Mike
Last Name: O'Melia
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Fred, I do not know what u mean by "front of body is moved back". Do u mean upper bout is squished along longitudinal axis? Bridge is in same location?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:37 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:42 pm
Posts: 2360
Location: Windsor Ontario Canada
First name: Fred
Last Name: Tellier
City: Windsor
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: N8T2C6
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
That is basically it, take a look at the shape of a 12 fret 000 and a 14 fret body, even the Martin D started life as a 12 fret and the body was shortened. The bridge will be in the same place as with the bracing just the length of the upper bout is less. As a thought you could make the body a cutaway even it you only expose the 14th or 15th fret. I don't think I have ever seen a cutaway harp guitar.

Fred

_________________
Fred Tellier
http://www.fetellierguitars.com
Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/pages/FE-Tellier-Guitars/163451547003866


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:09 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:13 am
Posts: 902
Location: Caves Beach, Australia
Actually when Martin went to 14 frets from 12, they shortened the body by about one fret and then moved the bridge forward (towards the neck) by the remaining amount.
The soundhole and bracing retained their position relative to the bridge.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:42 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:12 pm
Posts: 6994
First name: Mike
Last Name: O'Melia
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Fred, Jeff, thank you. Fred, there are plenty of hg cutaways. I just do not want to do that on this project. I want to create a 14 fret that looks like an original Dyer.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Colin North and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com