Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Jul 27, 2025 9:41 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:41 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:33 am
Posts: 1518
Location: Canada
Hey All
building #2 soundbox ....in between breaks from constructing #1 now
Now I just assumed that all the braces apart from the upper face and transverse... would be arched to the same radius as the X rad on the top...
Further reading in Cumpiano and Natelson, seems to reveal that MrC only radius' the X brace - and leaves the finger/tonebars as flat braces...as well as the soundhole reinforcements if Im also correct about that....
On my first guitar I just went ahead and radiused everything below the upper braces..... and upon reading the archives - there is a wid variety of styles of top bracing obviously..
I see mention from people of what braces they radius.... but no real explanation as to what they felt the advantage would be -
Im assuming its mainly strength advantage in top shrinkage,,, & perhaps some people have a feeling there is an increase in resonance....
Am I missing something else.... ??
Is this just another in a long list of simply "personal preferences"?
I realize that no bracing radius scheme is absolute, as some radius none of the braces and make amazing guitars,,,,
Just hoping someone could shed some light on why they feel radiusing top braces is especially advantageous...
Cheers
Charlie


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:59 pm 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian
Old Growth Brazilian

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:56 am
Posts: 10707
Location: United States
Finger braces are so short it really does not matter. However if you are attempting to brace to a structural dome with the bracing as unloaded as possible and yet still maintain the domes shape the best possible then you will need to radius the tone bars.

That said if you leave them straight the influence of the X brace and sting tension will bow them anyway. However they will be in a loaded state even prior to being strung up and trying to flex back to straight but partially with strained by the influence of the radiused X brace.

I prefer to add the radius so that the top is neutral loading as much as possible prior to string up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:32 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:58 am
Posts: 2774
Location: Tampa, Florida USA
Why wouldn't you radius them anyway? It's not like it takes that long to sand them on a dish. I don't think I'd take any short cuts on the top and bracing. But that's just me.
Now some leave the UTB and the braces above the X flat. But that's because of the fretboard tongue.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:32 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:21 am
Posts: 4915
Location: Central PA
First name: john
Last Name: hall
City: Hegins
State: pa
Zip/Postal Code: 17938
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
The only braces I radius are the Main X braces. I like to keep the others flat. The tone bars and finger braces are tonal braces more than structural.

_________________
John Hall
blues creek guitars
Authorized CF Martin Repair
Co President of ASIA
You Don't know what you don't know until you know it


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Michaeldc and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com