Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:13 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 3:39 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:35 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: United States
First name: Joe
Last Name: Beaver
City: Lake Forest
State: California
Focus: Build
I currently tuck the x-brace in both the upper and lower bouts. But....

I have been reading where some notable builders don't tuck any braces on the top. They say it gives them a top that is more responsive. I know some (including Taylor, so I hear) put a little channel around the top edge for the same reason.

If you do something like the above to 'loosen' the top what approach would you take to couple it with the back?

Thoughts?

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 4:26 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 am
Posts: 2593
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Danny
Last Name: Vincent
I've tucked the lower x. Once. I was not happy with the results. I do some perimeter thinning of the top from the waist stopping a couple inches short of the heel block. I just push with my thumb and look for a little more flex. Not overly scientific but that's the way I roll.

I could be mistaken but I think not tucking the upper braces would be asking for trouble. Never tried it though.



These users thanked the author DannyV for the post: Joe Beaver (Thu Jan 04, 2018 5:11 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 5:00 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:33 pm
Posts: 305
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio
First name: Greg
Last Name: Maxwell
City: Mount Vernon
State: Ohio
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
At Trevor Gore's suggestion, I did not tuck the lower bout ends of the X braces on my last two builds. I liked the results. I do graduate the rim of the lower bout, in about 2", setting the final thickness by feel and tap sound. The upper braces should be tucked.

_________________
It will probably be alright.



These users thanked the author Greg Maxwell for the post: Joe Beaver (Thu Jan 04, 2018 5:11 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 5:11 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:35 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: United States
First name: Joe
Last Name: Beaver
City: Lake Forest
State: California
Focus: Build
Danny & Greg
Good information. When I think about it there is really no reason to leave the upper bout x-brace untucked.

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 5:56 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:52 pm
Posts: 2953
First name: Don
Last Name: Parker
City: Charleston
State: West Virginia
Zip/Postal Code: 25314
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I tuck the upper legs, and don't tuck the lower legs. I think that the debate is normally about whether to tuck the lower legs. Everybody tucks the upper legs.

I think tucking the lower legs is overbuilding the thing, and it has a tendency to inhibit the top from moving the way it should. But I'm a hack, so . . .



These users thanked the author doncaparker for the post: Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:37 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 6:00 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:08 am
Posts: 1905
Location: Raleigh, NC
First name: Steve
Last Name: Sollod
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I used to not tuck the lower legs, but lately I've taken them down very thin and tucked them. I like that the top registers nicely when I'm gluing it up. I have my doubts whether a tiny tuck makes a difference either way...

_________________
Steve Sollod (pronounced sorta like "Solid")
www.swiftcreekguitars.com



These users thanked the author sdsollod for the post (total 2): Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:39 pm) • Clinchriver (Fri Jan 05, 2018 6:55 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:06 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 1:45 pm
Posts: 1445
First name: Michael
Last Name: Colbert
City: Anacortes
State: WA
Focus: Build
sdsollod wrote:
I used to not tuck the lower legs, but lately I've taken them down very thin and tucked them. I like that the top registers nicely when I'm gluing it up. I have my doubts whether a tiny tuck makes a difference either way...


I do the same thing, figuring that it may help prevent a future crack in the top at the rim...? I do tuck my upper bout X leaving the braces 1/8" tall at the lining. I've built several guitars where the lower X stops 1-1/2" or so short of the linings. I run into some of these folks now and then with nothing bad to report.



These users thanked the author Michaeldc for the post: Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:39 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:55 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6232
Location: Virginia
It depends. The one I am building now will have tucked braces because a tighter top is what I am going for. If I don't tuck them in then what I do is feather them down to zero and then the linings go over the feathered ends so in essence they are still tucked in but it's paper thin.



These users thanked the author jfmckenna for the post: Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:40 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 9:21 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 3289
Location: Alexandria MN
Uppers never lowers.

_________________
It's not what you don't know that hurts you, it's what you do know that's wrong.



These users thanked the author Terence Kennedy for the post: Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:40 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:23 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:35 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: United States
First name: Joe
Last Name: Beaver
City: Lake Forest
State: California
Focus: Build
I assume most of you don't tuck the lower face braces. So, if I have this right, when you don't tuck the lower x-braces or the face braces then the soundboard has a bit more freedom to give voice to the lower (longer sin wave) frequencies? All things being equal I should see a little more bass response and maybe slightly less treble and volume? Has that been your experience? And I suppose the rims are slightly less ridged. Not sure what effect that will have on the sound or volume, although probably slight.

Apparently no structural issues?

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust



These users thanked the author Joe Beaver for the post: Bri (Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:23 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 6:51 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:33 am
Posts: 1831
First name: Willard
Last Name: Guthrie
City: Cumberland
State: Maryland 21502
Zip/Postal Code: 21502
Country: United State
Focus: Repair
Status: Semi-pro
We do not tuck the lower X braces (or fingers or tone bars) - the load on that portion of the top is directed outward/toward the center of the body, so the extra weight and stiffness at the rim would seem to be both unnecessary for structural integrity and possibly detrimental to acoustic performance.

_________________
We have become a civilization that elevates idiots, prostitutes, and clowns. Am I still to defend it? Yes, for its principles. Yes, for what it was. Yes, for what it still may be.

-Mark Helprin, The Oceans and the Stars: A Sea Story, A War Story, A Love Story (A Novel)



These users thanked the author Woodie G for the post: Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:40 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:22 am 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:49 am
Posts: 12971
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
First name: Hesh
Last Name: Breakstone
City: Ann Arbor
State: Michigan
Country: United States
Status: Professional
Same as Woodie and crew, didn't tuck lower bout braces and instead feathered them to nothing.

I did tuck the UTB and upper X legs.

The whole idea of any of these implementations of not tucking, feathering to nothing, rabbiting around the lower bout top or, what I did, additionally thinning the top but from the outside to to free up the top. Not recommending this but less bracing, less tall bracing both strategically located and even wimpy top wood could..... when properly deployed.... possibly.... achieve the same end.

I watched a master who does commissions for the stars use his fingers to feel and watch top deflection and back deflection while holding a guitar in front of him and sideways. When I asked him what's up he said he was trying to determine how easily the top would......"pump....."

And there you have it or at least I did, that "pump" word was significant to me in my understanding of how we may want to top to function. Then one day I read Mario P. describe a guitar with it's top as not unlike a fireplace bellows and the dots were connected for me.

Now actually putting all of this to work in a meaningful manner and achieving our tonal goals is the real work.

_________________
Ann Arbor Guitars



These users thanked the author Hesh for the post: Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:41 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:23 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6232
Location: Virginia
BTW these discussions always remind me of this, can't help it :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl3HcIXvIo0

How does one embed youtube? The embed button seems to not work...


[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl3HcIXvIo0[/youtube]



These users thanked the author jfmckenna for the post (total 3): Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:44 pm) • Pmaj7 (Sat Jan 06, 2018 7:12 pm) • CharlieT (Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:52 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:36 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:08 am
Posts: 1905
Location: Raleigh, NC
First name: Steve
Last Name: Sollod
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Funny - That's one tuck and one no tuck...

_________________
Steve Sollod (pronounced sorta like "Solid")
www.swiftcreekguitars.com



These users thanked the author sdsollod for the post (total 2): Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:45 pm) • jfmckenna (Fri Jan 05, 2018 4:23 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:15 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 am
Posts: 2593
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Danny
Last Name: Vincent
Joe Beaver wrote:
Danny & Greg
Good information. When I think about it there is really no reason to leave the upper bout x-brace untucked.

But a few very solid reasons to tuck them.

All this post Christmas tuck talk has got me thinking! eek



These users thanked the author DannyV for the post: Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:37 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:41 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 2422
First name: Jay
Last Name: De Rocher
City: Bothell
State: Washington
After reading this thread and several past threads on the topic of tucking the ends of the lower x-brace arms, it's going to be one no tuck for me on the guitar I'm building now.

I'm also going to try a tip from Tom West in one of those previous threads:

"I allow all 4 ends of the X brace to go through the linings. On the lower ends I then cut of the ends where they emerge from the lining. This allows one to have the advantage of the indexing by the little stubs and still taper the ends of the lower X to nothing. Two birds one stone.
Tom"

"The impression I get from reading Tom's post is that he first fits the back ,notching the linings and allowing the braces to fit into them. He then cuts through the lower X braces at the point they meet the linings. He then tapers the lower legs to nothing, but leaves the little "stubs" that fit into the linings intact. When the back is glued on the little stubs take the place of the removed section of lining. Atleast that is how I am reading it."

_________________
Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right - Robert Hunter



These users thanked the author J De Rocher for the post (total 3): Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:42 pm) • Pmaj7 (Sat Jan 06, 2018 7:13 pm) • bcombs510 (Fri Jan 05, 2018 2:12 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:53 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:14 am
Posts: 819
First name: Tim
Last Name: Lynch
City: Santa Cruz
Zip/Postal Code: 95060
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I tuck the ends of the transverse brace and the upper legs of the X brace to try and get as much strength as possible in the upper bout.
I leave all brace ends untucked and feathered to the top in the lower bout to make that area as responsive as possible.
I have made a couple with the X tucked in the lower bout and felt it made the soundboard a little stiffer than what I was looking for.



These users thanked the author Tim L for the post: Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:42 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 6:45 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3865
Location: United States
My view is that anything that's taking enough load to be left thick at the ends needs to be tucked. If you don't want to tuck it, shave it away to nothing at the end, and do it far enough back so that the brace end is not so stiff that it will tend to peel loose from the top if it gets knocked. That's why they're tucked in; to keep them from peeling up.



These users thanked the author Alan Carruth for the post (total 2): Clay S. (Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:05 pm) • Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:43 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 7:15 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 2246
Location: Seattle WA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Put me down for a "no tuck"!

_________________
Pat



These users thanked the author Pmaj7 for the post: Joe Beaver (Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:43 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:59 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:35 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: United States
First name: Joe
Last Name: Beaver
City: Lake Forest
State: California
Focus: Build
Alan Carruth wrote:
My view is that anything that's taking enough load to be left thick at the ends needs to be tucked. If you don't want to tuck it, shave it away to nothing at the end, and do it far enough back so that the brace end is not so stiff that it will tend to peel loose from the top if it gets knocked. That's why they're tucked in; to keep them from peeling up.

So.... if you were to make a large body guitar, say 16+", how would you handle the lower bout bracing? I know that you consider several factors like top and back stiffness, body volume, back bracing, how the top and back are to couple, etc. before deciding. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:19 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 10:35 am
Posts: 356
Location: Hopkinton, MA
First name: Robert
Last Name: Ionta
City: Hopkinton
State: Massachusetts
Zip/Postal Code: 01748
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Also, if you (Alan) have another minute for answering questions, do you take the same approach for archtops? I've seen and heard your L5 archtop and I still dream about the sound of that guitar. It's a great one.



These users thanked the author bionta for the post: Joe Beaver (Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:03 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 12:22 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:20 pm
Posts: 456
Focus: Build
i do not tuck anything. and i do not couple the top to the back either. after assembly, binding finishing etc.. i want the back at least a whole note lower then the top. i will support the utb though, but not necessarily by tucking. i use tentallones and will stick one under each end of the utb on the rim. spanish style.



These users thanked the author arie for the post: Joe Beaver (Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:03 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 1:07 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5397
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
arie wrote:
i do not tuck anything. and i do not couple the top to the back either. after assembly, binding finishing etc.. i want the back at least a whole note lower then the top. i will support the utb though, but not necessarily by tucking. i use tentallones and will stick one under each end of the utb on the rim. spanish style.

Are you bulding SS or classicals? And if your back is <4/5 semitones from the top frequency, less or more doesn't matter, I believe it's coupled acoustically as well as mechanically (- hopefully)

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Last edited by Colin North on Mon Jan 08, 2018 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 1:09 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5397
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Upper X and UTB, not lowers, ('cepting the latest 12 string)

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.



These users thanked the author Colin North for the post: Joe Beaver (Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:04 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:15 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:35 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: United States
First name: Joe
Last Name: Beaver
City: Lake Forest
State: California
Focus: Build
Colin North wrote:
Upper X and UTB, not lowers, ('cepting the latest 12 string)

I generally don't tuck in the lower bout, except for my new jumbo model I decided to tuck all 4 corners of the x, but not the lower face braces. I still get a nice bass and what sounds to me like a balanced sound. It is unclear to me how much affect the tuck/nontuck thing had on sound or volumn.

I know some such as Alan, Trevor, you and others have done extensive testing and/or experience and have insight into what the expected effects would be.

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust



These users thanked the author Joe Beaver for the post: Dave Rickard (Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:49 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com