Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 6:30 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Damar Instead of Shellac
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:12 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:31 pm
Posts: 1877
First name: Darryl
Last Name: Young
State: AR
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Over a year ago we had a discussion on how best to "pop the grain" of the wood with our finishes (esp. when using a water based finish). In that thread, Andy Gamble mentioned how well Damar brings out the grain and still works well as a sealer. Since that discussion I've wanted to try it.

I ordered the Singapore Damar a while back but haven't had a chance to use it till this past weekend. I mixed up a 2lb cut of Damar with tupentine and sprayed it on the soundboard of the 00 I'm building to protect it from dust etc. while scraping/leveling the sides and help prevent tearout while routing the binding channels. I sanded to 220g then sprayed a single coat of the Damar. Only downside was it took 2 days to completely dry. I might try using mineral spirits as the solvent next time to see if that speeds up the drying. Now that it is dry it has sort of a matte finish.

I was really interested to see how well it set off this silky Lutz spruce I bought from Shane. I think it looks nice! What do you think?

Image

_________________
Formerly known as Adaboy.......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:17 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:59 pm
Posts: 2103
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Country: Romania
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
With that kind of silk who gives a ...with what is finished? :D Sorry couldn't help myself. I am curious about how it will hold to player wear (friction, heat, sweat)

_________________
Build log


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:21 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:32 pm
Posts: 3470
First name: Alex
Last Name: Kleon
City: Whitby
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: L1N8X2
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I think you are right, it does look very nice! Mineral spirits will quicken drying time, while turps. does the opposite. You could try using a drop of Japan Drier if it is still too slow, but try it on a test piece first.

Alex

_________________
"Indecision is the key to flexibility" .... Bumper sticker


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:28 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:31 pm
Posts: 1877
First name: Darryl
Last Name: Young
State: AR
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Alex, I will use a finish over this so it's purpose is for sealing/protecting/popping-the grain and the outside finish will hopefully take the abuse. Did I mention this is one of Shane's "second" tops and was cheap? It had a small knot in it which I located in the soundhole.

Unsure if I will use it on the mahogany or not.

_________________
Formerly known as Adaboy.......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:42 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Darryl: With that knot located in the middle of the soundhole it's hardly noticeable.....................!! The knot that is...............!! One beautiful looking top. Congrats.
Tom

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:53 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:06 am
Posts: 508
First name: Greg
Last Name: B
City: Los Angeles
State: California
That looks great to me. It pops better than shellac. I used it once for a dulcimer, mostly because I had some mixed up and ready to go.

Turpentine may actually be helpful here, as the longer dry time could allow deeper penetration into the grain.

FWIW, I find damar to take around a month to fully dry. If the topcoat will be oil based varnish, I'd still give it a couple or three days. For lacquer or anything else, it'd be a good idea to wait a couple weeks IMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:59 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:08 pm
Posts: 1958
Location: Missouri
First name: Patrick
Last Name: Hanna
State: Missouri
Country: USA
Hey, Darryl,

Damar varnish was once the finish of choice for sealing and protecting oil paintings, and is still used by many, many artists and conservators. You mentioned that your damar left a subtle matte finish. I am not familiar with what you were using, but for future experimentation purposes you can buy it in matte and gloss versions. One conservator I know mixes them 50/50 before re-coating a cleaned oil painting. As to the drying time, I think I'd give it several extra days after it feels dry.

Please do follow up and let us know how it works for you under a finish.

Patrick


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 7539
First name: Ed
Last Name: Bond
City: Nanaimo
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
It'd be interesting to see a side by side comparison with the offcuts...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:28 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 4819
meddlingfool wrote:
It'd be interesting to see a side by side comparison with the offcuts...


I did a test on both a maple top and an orphaned quilted mahogany back set. I compared damar, Bullseye, Z-poxy, straight lacquer, and vinyl sealer. I may or may not still have the mahogany piece, but the damar, Bullseye, and vinyl sealer pretty much looked identical to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:36 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Utah
Darryl Young wrote:
Did I mention this is one of Shane's "second" tops and was cheap?

It's such a shame that Shane's low grade tops are off quarter and have no medullary rays. laughing6-hehe

Sure looks nice, Darryl! [:Y:]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:35 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:31 pm
Posts: 1877
First name: Darryl
Last Name: Young
State: AR
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
James Orr wrote:
meddlingfool wrote:
It'd be interesting to see a side by side comparison with the offcuts...


I did a test on both a maple top and an orphaned quilted mahogany back set. I compared damar, Bullseye, Z-poxy, straight lacquer, and vinyl sealer. I may or may not still have the mahogany piece, but the damar, Bullseye, and vinyl sealer pretty much looked identical to me.


James, back in the old thread you had mentioned filling pores on the sapele with epoxy and applying this stuff over the epoxy. Do you recall if that is what you did? I only ask as it seems what is in contact with the bare wood makes the most difference as far as visually enhancing the grain so epoxy under these may sort of "normalize" the results.

_________________
Formerly known as Adaboy.......


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com