Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 10:40 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Gibson L-00 again
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 1:04 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:58 pm
Posts: 1449
First name: Ed
Last Name: Minch
City: Chestertown
State: MD
Zip/Postal Code: 21620
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I posted a couple of weeks ago about a 1933 Gibson L-00 I got cheap at an auction because it was pretty broken. I am making good progress on the repairs and am ready to glue on the new back - so a question:

The top has no cracks at the fretboard/soundhole area, but I have seen many of these lightly built guitars with those cracks. There is a brace just above the soundhole, but no other bracing up to the neck block.

Should I consider a popsicle brace?

Ed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gibson L-00 again
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 1:30 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 2060
I wouldn't be likely to add additional reinforcements unless specific issues are noted which directly require it.

Gibsons of that era were typically built with exceptionally tight dome on the top (often down in to the 12' radius range). This heavy compound radius alone will do an incredible amount to stiffen the top, so additional bracing may be unnecessary. I credit this heavy radius as to why fewer ladder braced old Gibson made instruments need neck resets or see significant top bellying compared even to x-braced models from other makers who used a flatter soundboard.

_________________
Eschew obfuscation, espouse elucidation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gibson L-00 again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:23 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:58 pm
Posts: 1449
First name: Ed
Last Name: Minch
City: Chestertown
State: MD
Zip/Postal Code: 21620
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
David

Thanks - there is no sign of trouble so I will just ignore the issue. I can always put one in later if there is any sign of a problem.

Ed

Eschew obfuscation, espouse elucidation - and foreswear sesquipedalianism.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com