Yeah I would be happy to the next time we have an ax that's getting them in the shop but you may have misread my statement. I also want to see what the fret ends look like on the 1870's Martin that we have in the shop with bar frets. I suspect that we won't see the radical bevel but have to wait until tomorrow to get back in the city.
Yesterday there were over 11,000 protesters right outside my shop.... The streets were shut down and half the city couldn't move for hours. These people sure get pissed when you don't have Saturday hours....

Kidding of course and remaining apolitical.

To me there is No "ideal" style for a fret end. There are lots of great styles that in my view meet the criterial of function that I appreciate seeing and using. Not sharp, not beveled overly (this is also a function of neck profile and if it has rolled edges or additionally rolled edges), shows a deliberateness of craftsmanship AND a uniform appearance, scratch free, glass like feel, ALWAYS completely seated and firmly attached (glued for me, glue choice can vary but ep*xy is not a good choice IME...). When I sight the edge of the board are all fret ends in the same plane? Is the precision of the overall fret work capable of industry norms for setting action, there are some specs out here for this, set-up specs say from Martin, Fender, G*bson, etc. Can your work exceed these specs and since the f*ctories do lousy work this is not at all hard to do.
So no ideal specification if you will Bosco but lots of things that are welcome in great fret work.
Food for thought. Would most players notice special fret ends if they were not pointed out to them? I don't think so. But they would notice their hands bleeding (maybe an exaggeration....) or at least notice sharp frets if they encounter them.
So maybe we take this a bit far in our criteria which makes me have to remember function and it's importance from time to time. What is it that they say, form follows function...
