Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:03 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 7:24 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:50 pm
Posts: 1091
Location: Goodrich, MI
First name: Ken
Last Name: Nagy
City: Goodrich
State: MI
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I like carving Archtops, and like the sound, but the sound of a good classical is amazing too. I haven't done one. I bought wood to make one a few years ago, but it is mahogany back and sides, and I heard they usually use other woods?

Do they use a crisper wood, for a bright, clear sound?

What is a good plan? Sometimes I follow them. I like the little 1800's guitars, but a classical is a Spanish guitar, isn't it? I think I'll do a 7 course Vihuela next. The ElectroLess Paul is nearing the finish stage, where you need to have something else to do. The plan I have for the Vihuela is really simple. Try to get good sound out of it, and then try the classical.

I watched this video, and that guitar sounds fine.

https://youtu.be/wgm7rmWjNpo

_________________
Why be normal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 7:39 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:50 pm
Posts: 1091
Location: Goodrich, MI
First name: Ken
Last Name: Nagy
City: Goodrich
State: MI
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
The guy has a baroque guitar that sounds good too!

Yes. It IS in the fingers.

https://youtu.be/jVl7TaAqb2A

_________________
Why be normal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 8:00 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 1:11 pm
Posts: 2335
Location: Spokane, Washington
First name: Pat
Last Name: Foster
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
A lot of classical players and builders think that rosewoods are the only way to go for a classical, but I don't think RWs are essential for a good sounding classical. Whether there's a discernible difference in sound is one of the big debates. You could build a perfectly good guitar with just about any decent B&S set. With mahogany, it might be hard to sell if that's your intent.

I've only built from two plans (with some of my own modifications), the 1888 Torres SE114 plan by Jeff Elliott, and the 1937 Hauser plan by Richard Bruné both from GAL. They're both well done, full of detail and thorough. The guitars have different characters, according to my customers: the Torres a little sweeter and the Hauser more powerful. The Torres is a bit smaller, though it was one of Torres' larger guitars. They have similar historical significance in the classical world to what the OM and dreadnought are in the steel string world.I don't think you could go wrong with either plan.

_________________
formerly known around here as burbank
_________________

http://www.patfosterguitars.com



These users thanked the author Pat Foster for the post: Ken Nagy (Wed Dec 21, 2022 12:37 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2022 8:37 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5924
I once visited a violin repair shop where the luthier was being commissioned to convert an old Aubert baroque guitar from 10 strings to 6. Seemed like a shame to me.
A baroque guitar would be fun to make, and would be somewhat unique. It would suffer less comparison from the wood snobs. pfft
The Courtnall book might give you a good overview of some of the more famous traditional makers' designs.



These users thanked the author Clay S. for the post: Ken Nagy (Wed Dec 21, 2022 12:37 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2022 9:52 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:52 pm
Posts: 2953
First name: Don
Last Name: Parker
City: Charleston
State: West Virginia
Zip/Postal Code: 25314
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Converting a 10 string to a 6 string? Heck, I can do that in 5 minutes, if you don’t mind the extra holes. And it’s reversible. :D



These users thanked the author doncaparker for the post (total 2): Clay S. (Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:48 pm) • Ken Nagy (Wed Dec 21, 2022 12:37 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2022 10:01 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6232
Location: Virginia
Brandon can make any guitar sound great :)

I have built about 10 classical guitars. One, well two but really one, came out absolutely fantastic. The rest are okay. I built one double top classical and it took a real long time for it to grow on me. I still don't like it a lot but it is loud. I built one flamenco guitar that sounds like a classical guitar so I failed on that one and am not sure what the deal is with that.

I mostly play classical guitar these days and I have a set of BRW that I plan on rewarding my self with some day and building a traditional Torres style guitar.

I have a 1950's Manual Contreras classical guitar that is all mahogany with a spruce top and it sounds fantastic. It's beautiful mahogany, probably Cuban. It is unusual for mahogany to be used in classical guitars but certainly not unheard of. If you want to sell it though then Mahogany is probably not the best choice as it is not traditional and classical guitar players are very steeped in their ways.

I did a restoration on a little Viennese guitar from the early 1800's a couple years back and it was truly a remarkable sounding guitar. All maple with a spruce top.



These users thanked the author jfmckenna for the post: Ken Nagy (Wed Dec 21, 2022 12:37 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2022 10:56 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:18 pm
Posts: 383
Location: Somerset UK
State: West Somerset
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I have used mainly American Maple but have also used Walnut, and, after acquiring an ex builders stash have used Indian Rosewood. It was not my intention to contrast and compare but I can hear little difference and what there is could just be small differences in the builds.

By the way they may not look it but they are based on the Torres SE 114 plans. The lower bout is an almost exact fit and the bracing as close as I could get to identical. The bracing by the way is incredibly light - about 2.5 mm as I recall. I like to do cutaways and since I don't have to sell them I just do it!

I also use bolt on necks so a complete heathen!

Cheers Dave


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.



These users thanked the author Dave m2 for the post: Ken Nagy (Wed Dec 21, 2022 12:38 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2022 12:09 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3865
Location: United States
Mahogany makes a nice Classical guitar, so go for it. As has been pointed out, the main issue is often selling them, but they sound good.

A few people make Classicals with the usual flat fan-braced top and a carved arched back (Buscarino 'Cabaret'). I've never done one like that (although I'm planning to at some point), but I have made a few with carved arched top and back plates. It seems to me that a carving the back is a way to make a softer, lower density wood act more like a rosewood: you end up with a heavier back with higher 'Q' resonances, like rosewood.

I made my first archtop steel string guitar with mahogany B&S. I had it on hand, and didn't want to use an expensive set of curly maple on what was, for me, an experiment. It turned out quite well. The owner has said that he hopes I remember what I did on that one, because if anything happens to it he'll be back for a copy. No pressure... So mahogany can work fine for an arched plate.



These users thanked the author Alan Carruth for the post: Ken Nagy (Wed Dec 21, 2022 12:38 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2022 12:51 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:50 pm
Posts: 1091
Location: Goodrich, MI
First name: Ken
Last Name: Nagy
City: Goodrich
State: MI
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I guess it will be mahogany. Makes it easy, nothing to buy. I'll have to learn how to make slot heads, and buy tuners.

I'll go with the Torres plan. Does it ship in a tube? Or is it pdf, and you have it printed it out?

Dave, that is interesting that you don't notice much difference. I don't notice much difference in the sound of my violins. Different woods, different arching. One is very easy to play, but isn't as interesting sound wise. The 5 string with Helicore steel strings sounds "hummy" to me. Nice, but different. The rest sound the same. Even the main modes on Audacity are about the same.

My archtop sounds WAY different from my little Stauffer. But they are different animals.

If you curve the back vertically, like the Stauffer, does that add stiffness, and brightness?
Seal the inside of the mahogany?
I always have questions.

Someone said that he makes violas out of cedar and mahogany. I have stock cut for that.

_________________
Why be normal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2022 2:08 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:46 pm
Posts: 2124
First name: Freeman
Last Name: Keller
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Ken, during the pandemic I did a little self challenge. I had built one classical years and years ago and had given it away, so I decided to build another. To make it a little more of a challenge I decided to build out of materials on hand - not to spend any new money on the guitar (I had to buy tuners). I decide to build with hand tools as much a possible, limiting myself to only tools used in Cumpanio/Natelson. I decide to use hide glue and French polish.

I had been given some beautiful straight grained Douglas fir from the gym floor of a local school and used that for top, back and sides. Doug fir has engineering properties very similar to spruce. I used the classica '37 Hauser plans.

Bottom line, while I am not a classical player I know a couple who are and they have pronounced it a "decent little guitar". I plan to take it to the GAL conference next summer and submit to the classical listening session just for laughs.

Attachment:
Top 1-1.jpg


Attachment:
Back 3-1.jpg


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.



These users thanked the author Freeman for the post: Ken Nagy (Wed Dec 21, 2022 2:17 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2022 2:44 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6232
Location: Virginia
Nice looking guitar there Freeman.

As for Dough Fir I just traded a couple pine tops that I cut with a guy for a couple Doug Fir tops that I just got in. I could not believe how stiff they were. Is that a trait of Doug Fir?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2022 3:42 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:46 pm
Posts: 2124
First name: Freeman
Last Name: Keller
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
jfmckenna wrote:
Nice looking guitar there Freeman.

As for Dough Fir I just traded a couple pine tops that I cut with a guy for a couple Doug Fir tops that I just got in. I could not believe how stiff they were. Is that a trait of Doug Fir?


According to the table in Mark French's book it is stiffer than Sitka. I used Alain Lambert's spectrum analyzer while I was building mine and got some pretty interesting tap tones. Don't know what they mean but they did give me confidence that I was headed in the right direction.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2022 4:37 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6232
Location: Virginia
Freeman wrote:
jfmckenna wrote:
Nice looking guitar there Freeman.

As for Dough Fir I just traded a couple pine tops that I cut with a guy for a couple Doug Fir tops that I just got in. I could not believe how stiff they were. Is that a trait of Doug Fir?


According to the table in Mark French's book it is stiffer than Sitka. I used Alain Lambert's spectrum analyzer while I was building mine and got some pretty interesting tap tones. Don't know what they mean but they did give me confidence that I was headed in the right direction.


Yeah it rings like a clear silver bell.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:00 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3865
Location: United States
Doug fir tends to be denser than most spruces, and much denser than average WRC. In softwoods the Young's modulus along the grain (which determines stiffness at a given thickness) tends to track the density surprisingly well, for a natural material. You can make a dense top thinner and still maintain adequate stiffness (which is what's really important). However, since stiffness goes as the cube of thickness, while Young's modulus tracks density liniarely (in the range we see) a dense top will tend to end up a bit heavier if it's worked to the same stiffness as a less dense one. This can cost a bit of power and treble response, all else equal. In practice it's not a huge difference, but it's better to use low density tops on Classicals when possible. Steel strings sometimes work better with a somewhat denser top: you get more 'headroom', and there's plenty of treble in the strings anyway.



These users thanked the author Alan Carruth for the post (total 2): Cal Maier (Thu Dec 22, 2022 10:00 pm) • Ken Nagy (Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:30 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:29 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:50 pm
Posts: 1091
Location: Goodrich, MI
First name: Ken
Last Name: Nagy
City: Goodrich
State: MI
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Alan Carruth wrote:
Doug fir tends to be denser than most spruces, and much denser than average WRC.


I bought a quartered piece of Doug fir a few months ago. I like the look; like a candy cane.

Attachment:
IMG_1200.jpg


I just measured the density:
13.66cm wide X 1.28cm thick X 138.4cm long divided by 1698 grams. and invert.

.7 sg! Really? Yikes.

12 string?


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Why be normal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:51 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:10 pm
Posts: 2476
Location: Argyle New York
First name: Mike/Mikey/Michael/hey you!
Last Name: Collins
City: Argyle
State: New York
Zip/Postal Code: 12809
Country: U.S.A. /America-yea!!
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
[img]1103[/img]classical back of Homingo


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Mike Collins



These users thanked the author Mike Collins for the post: Ken Nagy (Thu Dec 22, 2022 7:32 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 3:00 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5924
I was thinking what Alan so clearly articulated. Someone sent me a Doug fir top to try, and someday I hopefully will - on a large bodied steel string guitar. It looks very nice and is stiff, but heavy.
For a classical a low density, moderately stiff, paper white fine grained Engelmann spruce would be my choice. Alpine spruce and western red cedar are other good choices. I'm sure many other woods can be made to work, but why swim against the tide?



These users thanked the author Clay S. for the post: Ken Nagy (Fri Dec 23, 2022 11:10 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 7:32 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:50 pm
Posts: 1091
Location: Goodrich, MI
First name: Ken
Last Name: Nagy
City: Goodrich
State: MI
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I watched another great performance on a classical. How do you move your fingers like that? I looked up the sheet music and it has a low D. The strings are Hannabach Goldin. Almost 100 pounds of tension. Pricey, but not anything like violin strings, and even ONE Cello string is more than a set. Interesting. Guts would be less tension, but about $44 for the trebles. Not terrible if they last. Basses are cheap. Regular sets are cheap. Just thinking.

Full gut strings for a baroque guitar; about $75. Nylgut about half that.

https://youtu.be/9bXAVm7NZs8

_________________
Why be normal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 7:54 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:21 am
Posts: 3288
First name: Brad
Last Name: Combs
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
That was beautiful….


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

_________________
Insta - https://www.instagram.com/cbcguitars/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/cbcguitars


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 8:11 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 1:11 pm
Posts: 2335
Location: Spokane, Washington
First name: Pat
Last Name: Foster
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
If there's a Clapton of the classical guitar world, this might be him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlAzXWoQDlg

Then there's this young lady, up and coming. One of my favorite pieces.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8UXw36AN9E

_________________
formerly known around here as burbank
_________________

http://www.patfosterguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 10:12 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5924
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6i2KXR-gf4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTRhCeYb9kw
A couple pieces by the husband and wife duo Ida Presti and Alexandre Lagoya. Sadly, they only had 16 years together.
When I was a kid I aspired to play classical guitar, and learned a few pieces by Bach, Sor , and this one by Laurindo Almeida:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lsxFCYEWPA
My brother took it much further and learned the pieces that Pat linked to as well as Asturias (Leyenda) and the Bach Chaconne among others:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GY5y4Rp3tU8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3W-SdpmUb5g
After getting married and having kids he put down the guitar and hasn't played it since.
In the video Pat linked to of Kyuhee Park playing the Sor study she is playing a Daniel Friederich guitar, a maker featured in the Courtnall book.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2022 12:09 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 1:59 am
Posts: 675
First name: Eric
Last Name: Reid
City: Ben Lomond
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 95005
Country: USA
Status: Professional
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNNbFkb0gBk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K9cTHT-LV4

The first link is performed on a lattice braced guitar, and the second, on a Nomex double-top instrument. (Just to add to the options.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2022 11:04 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:10 pm
Posts: 2476
Location: Argyle New York
First name: Mike/Mikey/Michael/hey you!
Last Name: Collins
City: Argyle
State: New York
Zip/Postal Code: 12809
Country: U.S.A. /America-yea!!
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
[img]1098.jpg[/img]
Side ports om Homigo guitar


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Mike Collins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2022 11:28 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3865
Location: United States
Ken:
Sp/g at .7 is higher than any softwood sample I've ever tested. That type of grain, with the heavy latewood lines, is pretty characteristic of Doug fir. Latewood adds density out of proportion to the stiffness it imparts. If the ratio of latewood/earlywood was more 'normal' I'd expect that top to have a Young's modulus along the grain of around 24,000 megaPascals, but I'd be surprised if that's actually much over 19,000-20,000 mPa.

You might try it as B&S wood; it's in the rosewood class already for density, and Doug often has low damping.

According to Richardson, who's been behind a lot of the best research on guitar acoustics, the power output of a guitar is proportional to the ratio of vibrating Area/mass of the lower bout. The thickness of the top depends somewhat on the span of the lower bout. As with the floor in the house, as you make the span larger you have to beef up the structure to retain the necessary stiffness. In that situation, for a given structural design, mass goes up faster than area, suggesting that it's harder to make a powerful big guitar than a powerful small one. One implication of this is that there's less penalty for using a dense top on a smaller guitar.

I'd use some sort of stiffness test to determine how thick to make that top, and use in on a parlor guitar, or else on a whole raft of ukes...



These users thanked the author Alan Carruth for the post: Ken Nagy (Fri Dec 23, 2022 12:46 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Classical guitars
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2022 12:53 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:50 pm
Posts: 1091
Location: Goodrich, MI
First name: Ken
Last Name: Nagy
City: Goodrich
State: MI
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks for that Alan. It makes sense when you think about it. A cello, or upright bass SCREAMS for lighter wood. I was shocked, at the result myself. I measured, multiplied, and divided a few times.

Parlors would work. The board is only about 5.5" wide. With the smaller size you can find more back and side wood too.

_________________
Why be normal?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: John Steele and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com