Official Luthiers Forum!
http://www.luthiersforum.com/forum/

Vintage Gibson bridge dimensions
http://www.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=48964
Page 1 of 1

Author:  John Lewis [ Thu Feb 02, 2017 4:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Vintage Gibson bridge dimensions

Hi-

What are the finished bridge dimensions for the old style rectangular bridges on a L-00, J-35, J-45, etc. I think they are roughly 6" x 1" but what are the heights at the bass and treble sides? I want to make a Roy Smeck style 12 fret dread and need any and all info on the bridges.


Thanks guys!

Author:  Clinchriver [ Thu Feb 02, 2017 5:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Vintage Gibson bridge dimensions

John Lewis wrote:
Hi-

What are the finished bridge dimensions for the old style rectangular bridges on a L-00, J-35, J-45, etc. I think they are roughly 6" x 1" but what are the heights at the bass and treble sides? I want to make a Roy Smeck style 12 fret dread and need any and all info on the bridges.


Thanks guys!


6" X 1" is good, If your shooting for 1/2" string height at the bridge, subtract .080/.100 saddle height, your off and running. My daughters 13 fret Nick Lucas I built her bridge height is 3/8 on the bass side 11/32 on the treble with .120" saddle showing between the D & G

Author:  Ken McKay [ Mon Feb 06, 2017 11:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Vintage Gibson bridge dimensions

I agree but think just a bit thinner is more what they actually measure. I would suggest 7mm at the middle, between D and G string. And it tapers from 6 up to 8. A straight edge riding on the frets should be 7mm above the top between the D and G.

Author:  TimAllen [ Tue Feb 07, 2017 2:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Vintage Gibson bridge dimensions

There's a discussion of 1930s Gibson bridge sizes, with detailed photos of vintage Gibson bridges being calipered, at the UMGF. The starting question of the thread was whether a particular J35 bridge was original.

(The Unofficial Martin Guitar Forum > The Vintage Corner > 1938 J35 on Ebay - Is this bridge original?)

From what I could gather, the best explanation seems that the blanks started out 6 X 1 and then the length and width were reduced a bit in the process of shaping and smoothing. Over the decades, it seems that most bridges have been shaved down a bit, making it difficult to be certain about original thickness.

The shape of the bridges, especially the rounding of the ends, is quite distinctive, and the photos show this really clearly.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/