Official Luthiers Forum! http://www.luthiersforum.com/forum/ |
|
sanding or planing tops http://www.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=45358 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | nkforster [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:08 am ] |
Post subject: | sanding or planing tops |
Which do you do? Why so and what do you use? Here is my take on it: http://www.theluthierblog.com/articles/ ... undboards/ |
Author: | AlanC [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
Can you tell us your take here? |
Author: | mflazar [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
Stiffer when planed? How do you determine that? Even wood from the same billet can be different. I'm not sure I believe it. |
Author: | Ruby50 [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
I wonder of planing also crushes cell walls? I have no opinion until I see that paper. And as usual, each piece of wood is different, and its stiffness can be adjusted by bracing. So is there a practical application? I am all for hand work and mostly use hand tools for all woodworking projects. Ed |
Author: | Clinchriver [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
I believe you can get exceptional results either way, also some can always find a way to screw things up ![]() |
Author: | Clay S. [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
The article also stated that sanding after abrasive planing obviated most of the negative effects of abrasive planing. I think most of us sand or scrape our tops after running them through the drum sander. I am not knocking planing tops, just saying a sanded surface may be good enough. |
Author: | kencierp [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 9:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
If stiffness deflection is an important element in one's design then use of testing fixture would be a good idea -- it's the stiffness target goal that is of concern not the method or process. It stands to reason that abrasives leave grooves so when measured we are catching the peaks -- so a planed board has more "actual" surface area -- but so what? It's the deflection not the thickness measurements or process that count. |
Author: | Doug Balzer [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 9:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
I consistently find that my planed tops are stiffer than tops sanded to a lesser thickness ![]() |
Author: | Michael.N. [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 10:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
I use a hand plane, always have always will. I enjoy the process but I certainly don't claim any sonic advantage. I like the relatively quiet shop environment and they take up little space. Actually I use two different planes: a wooden Plane for removing the majority of the material, they are lighter and therefore 'fast', less tiring in use. I finish off with a metal smoothing Plane that has been set fine. I don't sand internal surfaces, they are either finished with the Plane or the scraper. The outside surfaces are sanded but if I had it all my own way they would be scraper finished. I like the way that Spruce takes on that Corduroy texture, the organic feel. It still seems like wood. Unfortunately the commercial market sees things differently. Personally I think they are missing something. |
Author: | DennisK [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
Block plane and scraper, because I don't have room for a thickness sander. For spruce, I think a planed and French polished surface is the ultimate ideal for clarity and depth (and snobbish showing off ![]() ![]() About the extra stiffness thing, only the last little bit would really need to be planed to remove the crushed subsurface cells, which is kind of necessary anyway due to the deep scratches from coarse sandpaper. If you need to remove 1/16" or something from a rough sawn top, I don't really see a reason to plane the whole way if you have a choice. |
Author: | meddlingfool [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
Trevor Gore goes into it a bit in his book. The underlying point is that by planing vs sanding, you can achieve less mass for the same stiffness in any given top. I've never been able to make the planes work for me, so drum sander it is... |
Author: | nkforster [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
AlanC wrote: Can you tell us your take here? Did you read the post, and the linked pdf? http://www.theluthierblog.com/articles/ ... undboards/ |
Author: | nkforster [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
Michael.N. wrote: I use a hand plane, always have always will. I enjoy the process but I certainly don't claim any sonic advantage. I'm not claiming any sonic advantages either, just putting it out there...what use folk make of this is up to them. Thousands of good guitars are made with sanded tops, I know, I've made a few hundred myself, but could they have been better? |
Author: | Michael.N. [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 12:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
No idea. You might be able to measure these things but it doesn't always follow that we can hear them. But really I've no idea. |
Author: | kencierp [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 4:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
AlanC wrote: Can you tell us your take? Did you read the post, and the linked pdf? Seems the link is not a PDF but rather an advertisement page |
Author: | nkforster [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 5:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
kencierp wrote: AlanC wrote: Can you tell us your take? Did you read the post, and the linked pdf? Seems the link is not a PDF but rather an advertisement page Think you're clicking on the wrong link Alan. This is the link in the middle of the post: http://128.104.77.228/documnts/pdf1986/murma86a.pdf If you read that, the post may make a bit more sense. |
Author: | Tai Fu [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 5:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
I plane tops by hand because I don't have a thickness sander. I would like to plane backs and side by hand but found that to be significantly harder to do, depending on back/side wood. Mahogany is easy but african blackwood is impossible. |
Author: | kencierp [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 5:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
Quote: Think you're clicking on the wrong link Alan. This is the link in the middle of the post: http://128.104.77.228/documnts/pdf1986/murma86a.pdf If you read that, the post may make a bit more sense. That is not the link in your post |
Author: | nkforster [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 5:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
kencierp wrote: Quote: Think you're clicking on the wrong link Alan. This is the link in the middle of the post: http://128.104.77.228/documnts/pdf1986/murma86a.pdf If you read that, the post may make a bit more sense. That is not the link in your post Yes it is! In order to repost it here, for you, I clicked on it. I've no idea what you're clicking on. |
Author: | kencierp [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 5:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
here's your original post Which do you do? Why so and what do you use? Here is my take on it: http://www.theluthierblog.com/articles/ ... undboards _________________ nigel http://www.theluthierblog.com http://www.nkforsterguitars.com/book/ |
Author: | Jim Kirby [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 6:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
Nigel's original post was correct, in terms of the link to the article, not sure what the problem is. The article is pretty interesting, but it does raise the question of whether the surface damage is going to survive final sanding. The photo-micrographs show damage in layers on the order of a few cells thick - in a practical sense, does this all get sanded away? I think it's a good topic, as I don't know the answer. |
Author: | pdolan [ Sun Mar 15, 2015 9:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
Couldn't one surface a piece of wood using their standard process and then take a sample of it and look at it under a microscope. Maybe hand plane one sample and sand another. Pete |
Author: | Colin North [ Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
I've seen a post or posts pointing out the article before. See http://www.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=35792&p=470340&hilit=murma86a#p470340 The finest grit used was 150, many of the tests were with 80 grit. Anyone here stop at 80 grit, or even 150? Article itself states that Quote: One possibility would be to apply light sanding after abrasive planing. But it does not investigate the results of removing the damaged outer layer of cells by, say, hand or ROS finish sanding. So what happens when you hand plane to thickness and then prepare for finish by sanding, be it by hand or ROS? I suspect that there will not be much difference at the end between the two methods if both are done with care. |
Author: | Michael.N. [ Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
It is possible to finish Spruce with the hand Plane, going straight to the finish. It will be as smooth as virtually any abrasive. With runout and bookmatched Tops that becomes less and less likely. You can also sand and finish off with a scraper. The scraper will remove any scratches left by the coarse grit. There are a few ways of getting to the same end result. But if you really want to see what 240G does to Spruce, sand it to that level and finish it in something like Danish Oil. You might be surprised just how many scratches remain in the wood. Finishes like Shellac tend to fill in and hide these scratches. Thin Oil finishes tend to highlight them. |
Author: | kencierp [ Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: sanding or planing tops |
Quote: The finest grit used was 150, many of the tests were with 80 grit. Anyone here stop at 80 grit, or even 150? Article itself states that Quote: One possibility would be to apply light sanding after abrasive planing. Exactly |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |