Official Luthiers Forum!
http://www.luthiersforum.com/forum/

building a small jumbo
http://www.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=31954
Page 1 of 1

Author:  coach [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:13 am ]
Post subject:  building a small jumbo

Just finished my first build and interested in starting my second.

First of all thanks to all who advised me. I learned soo much on this first build. I made a L-00 with ovangol body, carpathian spruce top, deep body, 12 fret neck, and slotted headstock. Though it is still breaking in, I'm really happy with the sound, even though there are quite a few cosmetic mistakes, and the finish(sprayed waterbased lacquer) is far from professional.

I'll post pics soon.

Anyway, I have a quick question about my next plan. I want to build one based on a J-185 plan, but am using Indian Rosewood with a redwood top. I'm interested in making a guitar for fingerstyle playing, so I would like a very balanced sounding guitar. To do this I thought I would decrease the depth to 4 1/8". I also thought about slightly increasing the sound hole size to bring out a little more midrange.

My question is this: The plan calls for 5/16" bracing. Should I lighten it up? Maybe use 1/4" bracing? Any advice and opinions would be appreciated. Thanks.


Sean

Author:  coach [ Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: building a small jumbo

Todd Stock wrote:
Keep in mind that the SJ is very close to the 000/OM in top area, so dropping the depth to 4-1/8" will get you something close to the 000 package, which is a little light on bass response. I build SJ's to 4-1/2" to 4-5/8", and get a very well balanced guitar.

IMO, the OLF SJ bracing plan tends toward the stout side; for a standard scalloped pattern, I think you would be happier with red spruce, sitka, or stiff Euro at 1/4" x .600" X, 1/4" x .500 tonebars, 1/4" x .375" fingers, 3/8" x 5/8" UTB, and for a stiff redwood top, around .125 on the body.



Todd,

I really appreciate the advice!! You helped me a couple times already, and I can't express how grateful I am. I thought the bracing plan seemed a little heavy. I actually went and looked again at Greven's jumbo, and I had it wrong. He does his at 4.25" not 4 1/8". I was thinking of doing it at that depth after his design. However, I'm going to take your advice on going 4 1/2". That would be only a 1/4" difference from the original Gibson. After my last build, I realize that sometimes less change is more. :)

Sean

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/