I don't wish to belabor a well-discussed subject, but the archived posts still leave me to wonder about ivory vs. bone vs. all others. I have a lot of materials that have been discussed as suitable, or more to the point, possible nut and saddle materials. I have a few bits of bone but I have pounds of mammoth ivory in white through deep butterscotch. All of it is dense and even-grained with only rare cracks, voids or layer separations and I would assume entirely suitable for nuts, saddles, tie-blocks, and so on. As I have plenty of the stuff and am quite used to working it for jewelry and objets d'art, is there a compelling reason to use bone instead, especially in the context of nylon vs. steel, as well.
Also, Dennis Leahy has advocated jade as a possible departure, and as I, too, am a faceter-lapidarist with a ready supply of muttonfat jade and other nephritic varieties, what drawbacks might there be to jade and other gemstones such as, say, chrysoprase? Mass would be a drawback, I'd think, but maybe I'm missing something.
I cast lead crystal and pate-de-verre, too. Any thoughts?
What else has been tried on classicals and what were the results? I also have corian, micarta, graphite, recon stone, MOP, coral, tagua, horn, antler and God only knows what else, but am especially interested in ivory vs. bone, and stone.
Caveats for any of these materials would be especially helpful. All speculations are welcome, too. It all sounds a bit mandarin, I'm sure, but I really am fascinated by the possibities.
|