Official Luthiers Forum!
http://www.luthiersforum.com/forum/

McKnight article in Guitarmaker
http://www.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=27899
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Mike Collins [ Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:42 am ]
Post subject:  McKnight article in Guitarmaker

Check out the lastest Guitarmaker for a great tech. article by Tim McKnight.
And other great articles also.
Mike

Author:  Terry Stowell [ Sun Jun 20, 2010 9:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: McKnight article in Guitarmaker

I don't receive Guitarmaker. :( What's the article about?

Author:  bluescreek [ Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: McKnight article in Guitarmaker

I was surprised on the results . It was a glue hardness study. Very interesting article. ASIA is back on track and we are hoping for better things in the future. If you were a member , please think about rejoining. It is a terrific organization.

Author:  Mike Collins [ Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: McKnight article in Guitarmaker

[:Y:] One of the other articles was a customer of Johns that was so pleased with Blues Creeks side bending equipment & advise John offered.

I belong to the G.A.L. also. http://www.luth.org
We all have a common goal that we share.
To make the best guitars we can!

The OLF is the way to get great advise,meet other makers without traveling the globe;and get instant answers to perplexing questions.
This forum is the best there is for new & experienced makers!

So if your not a member of these two organizations ;you may want to at least step up to one of them. http://www.guitarmaker.com

;)
I hope it was O.K. to post this Lance??

Mike

Author:  Alan Carruth [ Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: McKnight article in Guitarmaker

Although the hardness of the glue is probably one variable that makes a difference, I don't think it's the most important one, nor am I convinced that 'harder is better'.

I wonder about the fact that his testing showed HHG as softer than Titebond original: he does note that the HHG had a tendancy to crack in bulk due to shrinkage, and that could easily have lowered it's 'hardness' score.

As many people do, he seems to associate hardness with low damping. This is not always true.

In using the dictionary definition of 'dampening' he gets away from a more physically rigorous and useful one, where 'damping' is related to the rate of energy dissipation in the material. I do think that the damping factor of glue is probably important, and I think we need to do some tests to look at that.

As always, I'm happy to see people experimenting, even when I don't agree with their methods or results. The important thing is to open things up for debate: it's really the only way we'll ever get it right.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/