Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 8:01 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 6:15 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:20 pm
Posts: 632
Location: United States
I have been building 000 model guitars following Antes plans and back brace #2 is aligned is a way that when you look through the sound hole you see the brace - about 1/4 of the way toward the front of the soundhole.

Just wondering if any of you modify your bracing patters so the back braces dont show as much when looking straight on at the guitar and through the soundhole.

I played around a little moving the #2 brace further back (toward back) and #1 slightly forward toward the front and then re-positioning #3 & #4 back further. Looks like too much bracing on the back side and too large of a space without bracing between #1 and #2

Thougts


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 6:32 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 2060
I guess it's never crossed my mind, and I have to say I think it's the first time I've ever heard it mentioned as an aesthetic concern. I suppose I would put back braces in the same category of frets or tuners being visible. idunno It's a part of the instrument, and just never occurred to me as something to hide. Aside from Ovations or pressed back Guilds, they're visible in about every other flat top made, and I've never heard anyone bothered by it.

_________________
Eschew obfuscation, espouse elucidation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 7:21 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:10 pm
Posts: 2477
Location: Argyle New York
First name: Mike/Mikey/Michael/hey you!
Last Name: Collins
City: Argyle
State: New York
Zip/Postal Code: 12809
Country: U.S.A. /America-yea!!
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
My back braces are not placed for looks -but for supporting the back
where i think they are needed for the size of guitar they're on(in)
Plan ahead (a drawing) for all the guitar sizes you make !

Hey that area might be a good place for a new label! :)
It would be hard to impossible to tell if the position made a difference on tone!

Mike[url]
http://www.collinsguitars.com[/url]

_________________
Mike Collins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 7:48 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:15 pm
Posts: 2302
Location: Florida
I changed all of my guitars to use an X brace, so I moved the two upper bout braces so that the label area shows thru the soundhole. The two lower bout braces are replaced with an X brace instead.

_________________
Reguards,

Ken H


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:14 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 11:13 am
Posts: 1398
Location: United States
I simply cannot believe that this is even an issue...

What, move your teeth because people can see them when you open your mouth?

Ever hear the Bauhaus motto, "Form follows function"?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:54 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 105
Location: United States
ToddStock wrote:
Does a OOO really need four back braces? Martin uses four on all steel strings, but Jim Warwick and others go with three on smaller bodies.


I've been studying a lovely-sounding 1927 Mauer (Larson Bros.) in my shop for repair. 25 5/8" scale, 12 frets-to-smallish body, and six back braces!

_________________
James Warwick
J. Warwick Guitars, LLC
http://www.jwarwickguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:04 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:16 am
Posts: 2692
ToddStock wrote:
Does a OOO really need four back braces? Martin uses four on all steel strings, but Jim Warwick and others go with three on smaller bodies. While the #1 brace plays a big role in stiffening up the 'box' to keep the neck block from rotating, it seems as though the others can be shifted as necessary - particularly the waist, with the narrower span and stiffening from the linings.

I use four, but only because mine are pretty light to start with.


One of the great classical makers--Hernandez y Aguado iirc--tried using three back braces for a while and found a marked improvement in sound when they went to four (I think this is in the Courtnall book, but I haven't checked). I'm dubious that the four brace back was just a matter of one guy doing it and everyone else following suit. Getting by with fewer parts and less work isn't a novel idea.

_________________
Howard Klepper
http://www.klepperguitars.com

When all else fails, clean the shop.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Gary Davis and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com