Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 5:52 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:25 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:42 am
Posts: 564
Location: United States
First name: Stephen
Last Name: Ziegenfuss
City: Jackson
State: MI
Zip/Postal Code: 49203
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I have started building my first acoustic (under the amazing supervision of Lance-though I spend a great deal of time removing glue ;) ) and am really tossing around the idea of a soundport. This is primarily for another personal design element, but I do not want to sacrfice tonality and performance for aesthetics. As such, can someone lay out the rules of soundports? What's the general "ported" area? What should I expect tonally? Are there negative affects to certain frequency ranges?

I do so greatly appreciate your help and input!
Stephen

_________________
www.ziegenfussguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:45 pm 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian
Old Growth Brazilian

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:56 am
Posts: 10707
Location: United States
So many variables to assign given rules. So may post related to this. Your best informed bet is search the archive and read everything you can that Alan C. has written on this subject. That said if you keep the port in the upper bout and around a 1"-1 1/2" dia. opening you are not going to loose tone. your going to hear more things than you ever have in the past.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:12 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:42 am
Posts: 1574
Location: United States
I believe that a recent issue of GAL has interviews with a number of top builders regarding sound ports.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:14 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 5:34 am
Posts: 1906
Location: United States
MichaelP wrote:
So many variables to assign given rules. So may post related to this. Your best informed bet is search the archive and read everything you can that Alan C. has written on this subject. That said if you keep the port in the upper bout and around a 1"-1 1/2" dia. opening you are not going to loose tone. your going to hear more things than you ever have in the past.


I believe that the common "sound port" as we see in the majority of instruments does nothing for tone quality and in fact may even contribute to loss of projection. I do believe that the player will have an "enhanced" experience as sound is now being released in a direction in which the player is better able to hear. In our quest to build a better "matchbox" we see many "inovations" come about. I do not believe in this one. Perhaps one of our Master Luthiers who often visit will chime in and explain further. I simply can't, logically, understand how a loss of energy thru the side is beneficial...especially to the audience (I assume most of my customers are using their instruments for performance). I do understand that some players who play for themselves only would enjoy it.

_________________
Dave Bland

remember...

"If it doesn't play in tune...it's just pretty wood"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:18 pm 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:38 pm
Posts: 45
Location: Ann Arbor, MI USA
Michael's correct and I think that Al even built a guitar with plugable sound ports and did some measurements. Hopefully he will weigh-in here.

_________________
Hesh
Ann Arbor, MI USA
http://www.heshtone.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:15 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:42 am
Posts: 564
Location: United States
First name: Stephen
Last Name: Ziegenfuss
City: Jackson
State: MI
Zip/Postal Code: 49203
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I have spent a good bit of time reading things over in the archives, and have also read what Alan Carruth has to say on his website as well as what Tim McKnight says. While much of what is presented is useful in concept - it doesn't touch much on the application (size, location, geometry) of the soundport; which is what prompted my question. I greatly respect the work of all the veterans here and elsewhere, and respect the lessons they have learned on their own time and money. I am merely trying to skip over some of the beginners mistakes.

thanks for your input so far guys. Again, I greatly appreciate it.
Stephen

_________________
www.ziegenfussguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:14 pm 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian
Old Growth Brazilian

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:56 am
Posts: 10707
Location: United States
Ziegenfuss wrote:
I have spent a good bit of time reading things over in the archives, and have also read what Alan Carruth has to say on his website as well as what Tim McKnight says. While much of what is presented is useful in concept - it doesn't touch much on the application (size, location, geometry) of the soundport; which is what prompted my question. I greatly respect the work of all the veterans here and elsewhere, and respect the lessons they have learned on their own time and money. I am merely trying to skip over some of the beginners mistakes.

thanks for your input so far guys. Again, I greatly appreciate it.
Stephen



There again this would be hard to simply quantify but I will say this. The best results I have had to my ear on a grand concert sized guitar and smaller has been a 1 1/4" long by 3/4" wide ellipse pretty much centered on the apex of the upper bout. on larger guitar 1 1/2" long by 1" wide. But I have done several custom shaped ports like crosses and clovers that placed in the tangent flat between the waist radius and the upper bout radius with no problems. you have to under stand that the play will hear a slightly different sound than is project from the main sound hole.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:00 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:42 am
Posts: 564
Location: United States
First name: Stephen
Last Name: Ziegenfuss
City: Jackson
State: MI
Zip/Postal Code: 49203
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Michael,

In your experience, do the more decorative design ports have any different affect than the standard ovals?

Thank you so mcuh for your help.
Stephen

_________________
www.ziegenfussguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:06 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:16 am
Posts: 2692
Dave-SKG wrote:
MichaelP wrote:
S Perhaps one of our Master Luthiers who often visit will chime in and explain further. I simply can't, logically, understand how a loss of energy thru the side is beneficial...especially to the audience (I assume most of my customers are using their instruments for performance). I do understand that some players who play for themselves only would enjoy it.


I would chime in, having used side ports for the past six years on almost all my guitars, but I don't want to dub myself a Master Luthier. I'm a guitar maker. I just cut away everything that doesn't look like the guitar I'm thinking of.

_________________
Howard Klepper
http://www.klepperguitars.com

When all else fails, clean the shop.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:38 pm 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian
Old Growth Brazilian

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:56 am
Posts: 10707
Location: United States
Ziegenfuss wrote:
Michael,

In your experience, do the more decorative design ports have any different affect than the standard ovals?

Thank you so mcuh for your help.
Stephen


The size will affect the sound heard by the player I don't feel the shape has a lot of affect. I notice more highs the larger the port and always keep in mind that we hear a lot of what we want to hear so take mine as just one opinion. Once again I will bow to Al as the best authority around here on this topic. But the guild lines I posted earlier are working for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:26 pm 
Dave-SKG wrote:
MichaelP wrote:
So many variables to assign given rules. So may post related to this. Your best informed bet is search the archive and read everything you can that Alan C. has written on this subject. That said if you keep the port in the upper bout and around a 1"-1 1/2" dia. opening you are not going to loose tone. your going to hear more things than you ever have in the past.


I believe that the common "sound port" as we see in the majority of instruments does nothing for tone quality and in fact may even contribute to loss of projection. I do believe that the player will have an "enhanced" experience as sound is now being released in a direction in which the player is better able to hear. In our quest to build a better "matchbox" we see many "inovations" come about. I do not believe in this one. Perhaps one of our Master Luthiers who often visit will chime in and explain further. I simply can't, logically, understand how a loss of energy thru the side is beneficial...especially to the audience (I assume most of my customers are using their instruments for performance). I do understand that some players who play for themselves only would enjoy it.


Dave I respectfully disagree with you on soundports "may even contribute to loss of projection". Last year I attended a talk by Grit Laskin who demonstrated the effect of a soundport to the listener. He played one of his guitars with and without the soundport covered. Everyone in the audience heard the loss of projection when the port was covered. No doubt a soundport could lead to a loss of projection if not sized correctly. As for the player, this time I strongly disagree as my experience playing a number of ported guitars is the contrary. Not only is the volume enhanced to the player but I have found the player gets a better flavour for the tone that the audience hears.

I concur with the others, hopefully Al Carruth will weigh in on this thread as to sizing.

Michael, thank you for sharing your dimensions. No doubt a useful starting point.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:06 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:32 pm
Posts: 1969
Location: United States
As a player, I really like a sound port. I can't think of a good reason not to have one.

_________________
"An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is an adventure wrongly considered." G. K. Chesterton.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:58 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 10:54 am
Posts: 378
Location: Between Bordeaux and the Atlantic. S.W.France
Howard Klepper wrote:
Dave-SKG wrote:
MichaelP wrote:
S Perhaps one of our Master Luthiers who often visit will chime in and explain further. I simply can't, logically, understand how a loss of energy thru the side is beneficial...especially to the audience (I assume most of my customers are using their instruments for performance). I do understand that some players who play for themselves only would enjoy it.


I would chime in, having used side ports for the past six years on almost all my guitars, but I don't want to dub myself a Master Luthier. I'm a guitar maker. I just cut away everything that doesn't look like the guitar I'm thinking of.


You're too modest Howard. I believe that's also how Michaelangelo sculpted his David. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:15 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 11:13 am
Posts: 1398
Location: United States
Al has chimed in here on this in depth. Please don't forget the archives here. There's no reason for anyone to have to repeat themselves on this or any other subject.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:17 pm 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian
Old Growth Brazilian

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:56 am
Posts: 10707
Location: United States
Very strange :roll: There are two post with quote with in a quote that has a quote associated to me. I did not write it. David wrote it. some sort of glitch or Howard edited the text of the quote and that some how associated that paragraph to me.

This could be deadly :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:58 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:00 am
Posts: 139
Location: Monroe, GA USA
I have another thought on this subject. Some people say that the audiance can not tell a difference in tone but the player hears a big difference. If you are a player and hear more sonority coming from the instrument it is a big help as you try to play with feeling etc. Does this not translate into a better performance that the audience can hear?

This is assuming that the musician is good to begin with...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:02 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:51 pm
Posts: 7
Guest wrote:
Dave-SKG wrote:
MichaelP wrote:
So many variables to assign given rules. So may post related to this. Your best informed bet is search the archive and read everything you can that Alan C. has written on this subject. That said if you keep the port in the upper bout and around a 1"-1 1/2" dia. opening you are not going to loose tone. your going to hear more things than you ever have in the past.


I believe that the common "sound port" as we see in the majority of instruments does nothing for tone quality and in fact may even contribute to loss of projection. I do believe that the player will have an "enhanced" experience as sound is now being released in a direction in which the player is better able to hear. In our quest to build a better "matchbox" we see many "inovations" come about. I do not believe in this one. Perhaps one of our Master Luthiers who often visit will chime in and explain further. I simply can't, logically, understand how a loss of energy thru the side is beneficial...especially to the audience (I assume most of my customers are using their instruments for performance). I do understand that some players who play for themselves only would enjoy it.


Dave I respectfully disagree with you on soundports "may even contribute to loss of projection". Last year I attended a talk by Grit Laskin who demonstrated the effect of a soundport to the listener. He played one of his guitars with and without the soundport covered. Everyone in the audience heard the loss of projection when the port was covered. No doubt a soundport could lead to a loss of projection if not sized correctly. As for the player, this time I strongly disagree as my experience playing a number of ported guitars is the contrary. Not only is the volume enhanced to the player but I have found the player gets a better flavour for the tone that the audience hears.



My experience has been the same when talking about projection.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:05 pm 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian
Old Growth Brazilian

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:56 am
Posts: 10707
Location: United States
Barry Dudley wrote:
I have another thought on this subject. Some people say that the audiance can not tell a difference in tone but the player hears a big difference. If you are a player and hear more sonority coming from the instrument it is a big help as you try to play with feeling etc. Does this not translate into a better performance that the audience can hear?

This is assuming that the musician is good to begin with...


My personal feeling is yes. A player playing a guitar with a sound port will be much more aware of his or her attack and technique shortcomings during practice or performance. Therefore will invariably lead to better performance as well. To me this is the biggest benifit of a sound port.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:59 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:33 am
Posts: 1513
Location: Canada
If indeed that loss of projection is the largest detractor when criticizing soundports, then its easily remedied with sliding doors or plugs to close the ports when in performance,,,
This way a player can refine the nuances of his playing... soundport exposed while practicing, and then close the soundpost in a performance situation...
Cheers
Charlie


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:41 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:42 am
Posts: 564
Location: United States
First name: Stephen
Last Name: Ziegenfuss
City: Jackson
State: MI
Zip/Postal Code: 49203
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
That is where I get confused...Amid the literature that I have read, it is said that there can either be a slight decibal gain in output (.2 dB presented by Mr. McKnight) or a slight decibal loss overall and only in certain frequency ranges (Alan Carruth). Obviously, I am very much oversimplifiying the issue and comparing data resulting from two very different tests. So to make matters simple, I will say this - I am a bass player and not an acoustic player. I am making this acoustic for a friend who I care very deeply about who I also believe may end up doing well in the music business (Thomas Mack). I want it to be the best I can possibly make it with "features" that can facilitate his growth in tone as a musician. Should I put one in?

Thanks
Stephen

_________________
www.ziegenfussguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:19 pm 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian
Old Growth Brazilian

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:56 am
Posts: 10707
Location: United States
Considering your last post Maybe you should study the physics of the sound port for about ummm lets say some 10 15 years then you will know for sure in you own mind if you want one, what size and shape to use. by then you will think you know exactly what the outcome will be, only to be surprised but what actually happened.

Or you can take a leap of faith a pick a starting point and build one to a given spec and learn form the process and carry the new knowledge into your next build :D

My point is you can read and read and ask and ask. but saw dust sweat and glue are the real teachers around here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:55 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:42 am
Posts: 564
Location: United States
First name: Stephen
Last Name: Ziegenfuss
City: Jackson
State: MI
Zip/Postal Code: 49203
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Yeah Michael,

At the end of the day I very much agree with you - and that is how I have lived my life thus far. I am just uncharacteristically hesitant on this one becuase I want every choice and detail to be as perfect and well done and as well thought through as possible. But sometimes you just need to pick it and go...

Thanks for the kick

_________________
www.ziegenfussguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: PGrubb and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com