Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Aug 08, 2025 12:44 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:36 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:28 pm
Posts: 383
First name: William
Last Name: Snyder
City: Brooklyn
State: NY
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
elb_flys wrote:
Grumpy - in a recent post on a similar topic, you indicated that your new bridge wood preference was Africa Blackwood. Based on that post I bought some African Blackwood bridge blanks. What received was 75% denser than the BRW bridge blanks I have and a littler denser than the ebony I measured. Did I receive Blackwood on the very dense side or do you trim your Blackwood bridges to get weight down, but 75% is a lot?

Thanks to all for the comments. Great stuff.

EddieLee



I can't answer anything that's specific to Mario's bridge but your stated density for ABW as compared with BRW and AE sounds about right.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:49 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:58 am
Posts: 1667
Trevor, I wasn't being a smartass; while lightweight may be best for responsiveness and power, it comes at a price in tone. Not everyone wants, or needs, or can use, the tone produced by an uber-light bridge. Personally, I -want- mine to be ultra lights, like you, but it's not for everyone.

As for the ABW VS BRW, I don't know where you got your 75% figure.... Most of my BRW stash is good, dense stuff, not all that much lighter than ABW. African Blackwood is also a true rosewood, BTW. At the end of the day, I still don't have a problem getting a ABW bridge to well under 20 grams...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:45 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:28 pm
Posts: 383
First name: William
Last Name: Snyder
City: Brooklyn
State: NY
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
According to the published numbers ABW can range from about 34%-78% denser than BRW so 75%, though on the high side, is within reason.

I don't use a ton of ABW but I'd estimate that the stuff I've used has averaged around 50% denser than the average BRW I've used.
I'd agree that I've had no problem getting it down to the weight range that I'm shooting for on steel string bridges. I don't think I'll be using it on any of my classical bridges, though, unless I come across some stuff on the it's low extreme for density.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 8:17 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
grumpy wrote:
Trevor, I wasn't being a smartass; while lightweight may be best for responsiveness and power, it comes at a price in tone. Not everyone wants, or needs, or can use, the tone produced by an uber-light bridge. Personally, I -want- mine to be ultra lights, like you, but it's not for everyone.

Sure, and there are plenty of ways of changing tone. I perhaps should also point out that I'm building mainly fingerpicking guitars, so I'm not usually in the 13-56 ball park with a flatpick. Remember that it's easy to get more bridge mass by using heavier bridge pins, whilst it's not quite so easy to go lighter if you started out with a heavier bridge. Just tools in the tonal tool box.

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 5:56 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:58 am
Posts: 1667
According to the published numbers ABW can range from about 34%-78% denser than BRW so 75%, though on the high side, is within reason.

Most "published" sources list BRW way, way too low in density. Yes, some of it is very light, but most sources list it as having a lower specific gravity, on average, than EIR's average, and that's just plain wrong. I'd estimate, going by what my bridges weigh, that the ABW I'm using is no more than 20% denser than the BRW I was using, and likely closer to 15%. I do have some very nice, light BRW bridge blanks, but my preference was for the densest ones. I've also tried Amazon RW for bridges, successfully. It's pretty much a dead-ringer for my densest BRW.

I would definitely NOT recommend ABW for a classical bridge, though. I doubt it would work well, even if whittled down to a reasonable weight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 10:59 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:05 am
Posts: 9191
Location: United States
First name: Waddy
Last Name: Thomson
City: Charlotte
State: NC
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
It's all in the tape, Filippo! I recommend Aluminum Duct Tape! Shiny and light, sticks well.

_________________
Waddy

Photobucket Build Album Library

Sound Clips of most of my guitars


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 298
First name: Jay
Last Name: Swann
City: Austin
State: TX
Zip/Postal Code: 78739
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks to Al, Trevor, et. al for weighing in (pardon the pun) ;) on the subject. I am captivated by the more scientific side of luthiery as it relates to building better instruments. This is one of the first discussions that has actually given me quantifiable concepts that I feel I can use in my building immediately. I feel that I am now equipped to make adjustments in the sound of my instruments based on specific changes that can be attributed to bridge design, weight, and material. Thank you all for the insights!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:40 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5968
I usually buy the "B" grade African blackwood. Aside from being cheaper I think it is slightly less dense than the "A" grade stuff. I don't mind a fairly heavy bridge for a steel string, even for a fingerstyle guitar. I think it helps it ring longer. One thing I like about AB is that you can make it look like either a rosewood (which it is) or ebony (by oiling it).
I think stiffness is as important as weight for a bridge, and losing one at the expense of the other is not always a good thing. Having a design that allows each factor to be adjusted separately is not easy to find but is something to work toward.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:26 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Clay S. wrote:
I think stiffness is as important as weight for a bridge, and losing one at the expense of the other is not always a good thing. Having a design that allows each factor to be adjusted separately is not easy to find but is something to work toward.

Most of my bridges incorporate CF for exactly that reason.

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:16 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:35 pm
Posts: 2561
Country: USA
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
This brings up an interesting question.

For those who believe "lighter is better", do you use lightweight bridge pins, IE plastic or wood?

_________________
Old growth, shmold growth!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:02 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:59 pm
Posts: 3624
First name: Dennis
Last Name: Kincheloe
City: Kansas City
State: MO
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
theguitarwhisperer wrote:
This brings up an interesting question.

For those who believe "lighter is better", do you use lightweight bridge pins, IE plastic or wood?

Yup.

Actually I like light weight and light color :)

I think I'm gonna have to get into custom pin making, because light colored, unslotted, 3 degree wood pins are hard to come by. The boxwood pins that LMI sells are nice, but slotted. And I'd really like to have some even lighter colors too, like maple, holly and pecan. Looks much nicer against a dark bridge than ebony and rosewood, IMO. Don't know why maple pins aren't widely available... maybe too soft for slotted, and not enough demand for unslotted? But maybe if I can get a speedy lathe setup going, I could fill that void in the market :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Michaeldc and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com